Wizard of Id by Parker and Hart for August 29, 2015

  1. Picture 001
    rshive  about 9 years ago

    Something wick-ed this way comes.

     •  Reply
  2. Millionchimps1
    tripwire45  about 9 years ago

    Just once I’d like some judge to throw one of these frivolous lawsuits out of court and the person who wants to sue along with it.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Al Nala  about 9 years ago

    Judge Judy would verbally blister his butt.

     •  Reply
  4. Avatar
    neverenoughgold  about 9 years ago

    @Jamesyou and me both.

    Make that three! Unfortunately, there is just to much money to be made through these frivolous lawsuits…

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    I Quit  about 9 years ago

    Jack be nimble,Jack be quick.Jack be litigious,Oh how sick.

     •  Reply
  6. Cool smiley
    Dewed  about 9 years ago

    Jack-Be-Flammable

     •  Reply
  7. Bobbyavatar
    Saddenedby Premium Member about 9 years ago

    the candle stick maker gets his wicks from the government per governmental order of unionized candle stick makers. thus jack will have no luck in court as the judge will rule that the wicks were of governmental standard and from the government thus making it an impossibility for him to sue. AND the senator from ‘take your pick of state’ will immediately write a law that says that all candle jumpers will have to have asbestos seated pants in order to be able to jump candle sticks and since asbestos is cancer causing no manufacturer will be able to make them or sell them and so the art of candle stick jumping will come to an end thus protecting the candle stick jumpers from themselves and all the senators will pat themselves on the back while they pad their resume and all the media talking heads will pat themselves on the back for bringing this horrible self abuse issue to the nation and NOBODY will even come close to mentioning the fact that if jack had simply quite jumping candle sticks he wouldn’t burn his bum. AND nobody will read this because it is too long so they will simply skip over it and vote for it.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    legaleagle48  about 9 years ago

    And I’ll ask you the same question. What’s your definition of “frivolous”?

     •  Reply
  9. Img 20240924 104124950 2
    David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace  about 9 years ago

    @@legaleagle48@James“Define “frivolous.” "

    . FRIVOLOUSof little weight or importancehaving no sound basis (as in fact or law) lacking in seriousness

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    rcerinys701  about 9 years ago

    Actually, the idiot’s parents should be sued for letting a mental incompetent wander around without a keeper.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    falcon_370f  about 9 years ago

    Jack be nimbleJack be quickJack jump over the candlestickIf only he had jumped a little higherHe wouldn’t have caught his pants on fire

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Wizard of Id