Given that some folks can take little more that a colored pen, press it against a standard size canvas so a leaves a dot no bigger a period, call it art, and then sell it for five figures or more tells me Lucy’s wrong about what Linus doing not being art. And there are other things that folks get away with calling art. I could take and make a ham and Swiss, take a couple bites out of it, set it on a plate, then call it something stupid like “Man Visits Ego” and I can assure you that if I get the right museum and the right crowd I’d get away with calling it art and make big bucks off what should have been lunch. Doubt too many calling themselves artists got away with stuff like that back when this strip originally ran. Today some of what passes as art is just ridiculous.
Back when this strip originally ran, they already had Picasso and Dada-ism and “surrealism” and stuff like that. Nothing new under the sun. And that’s probably Schulz’ point.
This was the last ever strip to include the rectangle “Peanuts by Schulz” block even though since 1966 it has used the “Peanuts Featuring Good ’Ol Charlie Brown by Schulz” thing in the first box.
Many years ago Jackson Pollack tripped and dumped 5 or 6 paint cans onto the canvas on the floor(I believe it went for $300,000 recently)..The colorist today got almost everything right,,,,except the red streaks …..in the sky
This is exactly what the art world has come to. Art is what the critics decide is art, not what the artist makes on his own or the potential customer likes. The critic (here portrayed by Lucy) decides what is and isn’t art, and what is and isn’t good. The artist must abide by that or not be exhibited and the customer must buy it or be totally regarded as having no taste. But the real test is how the world regards things 100 year after the fact. Van Gogh, who never sold a painting during his life is far more popular than many of his critically acclaimed contemporaries.
Linux0s about 9 years ago
Art critic, personality critic, it’s all the same skill.
knight1192a about 9 years ago
Given that some folks can take little more that a colored pen, press it against a standard size canvas so a leaves a dot no bigger a period, call it art, and then sell it for five figures or more tells me Lucy’s wrong about what Linus doing not being art. And there are other things that folks get away with calling art. I could take and make a ham and Swiss, take a couple bites out of it, set it on a plate, then call it something stupid like “Man Visits Ego” and I can assure you that if I get the right museum and the right crowd I’d get away with calling it art and make big bucks off what should have been lunch. Doubt too many calling themselves artists got away with stuff like that back when this strip originally ran. Today some of what passes as art is just ridiculous.
orinoco womble about 9 years ago
Back when this strip originally ran, they already had Picasso and Dada-ism and “surrealism” and stuff like that. Nothing new under the sun. And that’s probably Schulz’ point.
GROG Premium Member about 9 years ago
I think Lucy just described a number of Kinkade paintings.
Robert Nowall Premium Member about 9 years ago
Usually critics just contribute by peeing on the art. Lucy demands changes.
Zachstar777 about 9 years ago
art to heart ..
sandhillroad about 9 years ago
It becomes art the minute you put it in a frame.
e.groves about 9 years ago
I don’t know art, but I know what I like. I’ve seen cars built in the thirties that to me, are as much art as a painting.
Darryl Heine about 9 years ago
This was the last ever strip to include the rectangle “Peanuts by Schulz” block even though since 1966 it has used the “Peanuts Featuring Good ’Ol Charlie Brown by Schulz” thing in the first box.
Pocosdad about 9 years ago
Lucy went on to work for Thomas Kincaid, “Painter of Dreck”
cubswin2016 about 9 years ago
Art is subjective. It is what you think it is. Lucy should take her ego and go jump in the lake.
dlkrueger33 about 9 years ago
Ruthie would know good art. “Drawed” while you wait. She could advise Linus.
neverenoughgold about 9 years ago
Art is usually just expensive crap!
Number Three about 9 years ago
Would you like to know what ISN’T art, Lucy?
Your face.
xxx
Michd about 9 years ago
Lucy is in an unusually good mood today.
boldyuma about 9 years ago
Many years ago Jackson Pollack tripped and dumped 5 or 6 paint cans onto the canvas on the floor(I believe it went for $300,000 recently)..The colorist today got almost everything right,,,,except the red streaks …..in the sky
bmckee about 9 years ago
This is exactly what the art world has come to. Art is what the critics decide is art, not what the artist makes on his own or the potential customer likes. The critic (here portrayed by Lucy) decides what is and isn’t art, and what is and isn’t good. The artist must abide by that or not be exhibited and the customer must buy it or be totally regarded as having no taste. But the real test is how the world regards things 100 year after the fact. Van Gogh, who never sold a painting during his life is far more popular than many of his critically acclaimed contemporaries.
tammyspeakslife Premium Member about 9 years ago
I got allot of unsolicited advice when I was painting a mural. My Pastor called it ’painting by committee.
Gretchen's Mom about 9 years ago
Today’s “Brevity comic strip:
MoeMentum about 9 years ago
all i need to say is lol
VMB! almost 4 years ago
you did a GREAT Job! it looks Incredibly amazing!