Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly for September 05, 2010

  1. Large steve45
    JP Steve Premium Member about 14 years ago

    Innocent until proven lawyerless?

     •  Reply
  2. Dataweaver 80
    dataweaver  about 14 years ago

    Same thing: if you have no cents, you have no lawyers worth speaking of.

     •  Reply
  3. Hobbesheart
    tis4kis  about 14 years ago

    If you have no cents, you get a lawyer who has no sense.

     •  Reply
  4. But eo
    Rakkav  about 14 years ago

    Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time…

    (well, someone had to say it)

     •  Reply
  5. Cnh
    moronbis  about 14 years ago

    Is that why I see no lawyers behind the bars?

     •  Reply
  6. Exploding human fat bombs hedge 060110
    Charles Brobst Premium Member about 14 years ago

    No money for a lawyer means no defense. A public defender is not paid for by the defendant and so is not answerable to him.

     •  Reply
  7. Phoenix rose1
    tim_1975  about 14 years ago

    you mean public pretender?

     •  Reply
  8. Dscn0003 crop crop
    magnamax  about 14 years ago

    My PD found a procedural error that got my case dismissed. I thought that was pretty good considering he only had ten minutes in his schedule to spend with me. PD’s aren’t dumb, per se, but they have very little time per client. (I used to drink. A lot. My bladder was full, I was near blind drunk, and I didn’t see the kids that saw me. There was no intent, but I could still have wound up as a sex offender for life.)

     •  Reply
  9. Gedc0161
    gofinsc  about 14 years ago

    Would that charge cause the same result if the offender were a female?

     •  Reply
  10. Dscn7190 small
    stuart  about 14 years ago

    @gofinsc, Thanks to the Violence Against Women Act, the answer is no.

    VAWA was attempting to address a long standing problem. Women were assaulted by boyfriends or husbands, and would be reluctant to call the police because usually there wasn’t enough hard evidence to lock up the offender - and the woman would get punished even worse for snitching.

    Even when the guy was jailed, women addicted to a bad relationship would show up at court monday morning pleading to let the guy out again so he can go to work.

    However, VAWA has created the opposite problem. Now, any accusation of “Domestic Violence” requires an arrest, regardless of evidence or lack of it. “Domestic Violence” is very loosely defined and includes “not giving the woman what she wants” (I kid not). Sometimes women in an otherwise good relationship call the cops in a fit of anger (or PMS or alcohol/med interaction) to teach her guy a lesson, and then spend years trying to get the courts to allow the buy back home. Far more often, women use the law as form of legal violence to punish the man, mirroring the abuse inflicted on women by violent men. An accusation with no evidence will jail a man, ruin his career, and generally provide (briefly) satisfying revenge. The Duke Lacrosse saga is actually a very common occurrence (just not usually in the media).

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    rotts  about 14 years ago

    Spammerflaggen!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Shoe