Speed Bump by Dave Coverly for November 26, 2016

  1. Leprechaun
    oldpine52  about 8 years ago

    Makes as much sense as that other theory.

     •  Reply
  2. Black lion
    PICTO  about 8 years ago

    He should be able to put together a righteous house band…

     •  Reply
  3. Ys
    HabaneroBuck  about 8 years ago

    I’ve always wondered how materialistic scientists can take the Big Bang Theory seriously. It is completely faith-based within the first 0.0000003 seconds of happening (when all laws of physics cease to have meaning).

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    SunflowerGirl100  about 8 years ago

    The whole point of science is to take all the evidence available and create a working hypothesis. That theory is not set in concrete. As soon as new evidence comes along, a new theory is formed. The Big Bang Theory was based on the best evidence known at the time. Incidentally, the term itself was a joke by Fred Hoyle(famous author and scientist) who disagreed with it.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    crowmountain  about 8 years ago

    How would it have been different if that dude didn’t require glasses?

     •  Reply
  6. Ecd86d39 32ff 4415 8649 563cd2c1048d
    Joan Tinnin Premium Member about 8 years ago

    Why is god always old?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    gammaguy  about 8 years ago

    The whole shebang just wouldn’t be the same without the “she”.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Thomas & Tifffany Connolly  about 8 years ago

    That’s just far out, man! Totally Wild!!

     •  Reply
  9. Sunset on fire
    Fuzzy Thinker Premium Member about 8 years ago

    I was on the committee to make the 10th planet. We were dysfunctional. The result was the asteroid belt.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Speed Bump