It is, of course, quite feasible not only to draw stereoscopic images in a flat medium, but even more importantly, to view them as three-dimensional figures without the aid of any special optical device. So Fry and Lewis could pull this off quite easily if they wanted. [Actually, that sounds like just the sort of thing Stephan Pastis would take a stab at, but I don’t think he ever has.]
andrewmmadsen almost 7 years ago
I’ve always hated the in-your-face gimmick in 3D movies.
RolandRackham almost 7 years ago
2D or not 2D? That is the question! (Sorry.)
Lyons Group, Inc. almost 7 years ago
You two (and Verne) were in a 3-D computer-animated movie 11 years ago.
Andrew Sleeth almost 7 years ago
It is, of course, quite feasible not only to draw stereoscopic images in a flat medium, but even more importantly, to view them as three-dimensional figures without the aid of any special optical device. So Fry and Lewis could pull this off quite easily if they wanted. [Actually, that sounds like just the sort of thing Stephan Pastis would take a stab at, but I don’t think he ever has.]
Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo] almost 7 years ago
The artist’s use of light and shadow also makes it appear in three dimensions.
danketaz Premium Member almost 7 years ago
Good news Hammy. Nothing stuck in your teeth.