Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
Seems wasteful and unnecessary. Why not just indoctrinate the kids to embrace your ideas and ideals as Absolute Truth and train them to express them forcefully at every available opportunity. They will act out in the least inconvenience, not to mention the drama they will generate when faced with an actual âcrisisâ.
As for arming them, no. We need to have Gun-Free Zones. They provide safe, target-rich environments for those who fail to conform to the mental and emotional entrainment process and spin out into eccentric outside orbits.
We have been aware for a long time that Gun-Free Zones were harmful, but insist that the only cure for the problem is a bigger Gun-Free Zone.
It is similar to how we insist that the economic harm done by taxation may be remedied by increasing taxation, or the harm done by an oppressive police state may be repaired by a totalitarian police state.
If it werenât so scarily close to the truth, this would be funny butâŚ
.
NRA = NATION of RABID A$$HOLES
And before anyone gets on my case, Iâve been a licensed firearms owner and instructor for most of my life, and YES, the U.S, needs to divest itself of the influence of the NRA and YES, the U.S. needs to have better firearms regulations and controls, and NO, an 18 year old civilian doesnât need to own an AR15 rifle !
I can see the headlines, âRandom and Trained Teachers are now Armed!â
I can also see the next tragedy, âGunman Kills 23 Teachersâ
Itâs simple I think. If the murderer knows the teacher may be armed, who will he shoot first? The teachers, as any good teacher would, will be protecting the kids first, not roaming the halls looking for a shootout. That gives the killer ample time to choose his targets. No folks, it wonât help. It MIGHT reduce the number of killed and wounded, MAYBE.
I can hear the teacher say, âStay here and keep your heads down, I have to go shoot someone.â
The only solution, since we can not completely eliminate firearms, is to keep the hideous things out of our schools by whatever means necessary. For that, I would pay more in taxes. Arming teachers? Not.
When Trump first came down the escalator to announce he was running for President, those were all paid actors holding signs and cheering, that was not a grassroots uprising.
Say What Nowâ˝ Premium Member about 7 years ago
The GOP is full of crisis actors, paid for by the NRA.
Brass Orchid Premium Member about 7 years ago
Seems wasteful and unnecessary. Why not just indoctrinate the kids to embrace your ideas and ideals as Absolute Truth and train them to express them forcefully at every available opportunity. They will act out in the least inconvenience, not to mention the drama they will generate when faced with an actual âcrisisâ.
As for arming them, no. We need to have Gun-Free Zones. They provide safe, target-rich environments for those who fail to conform to the mental and emotional entrainment process and spin out into eccentric outside orbits.
We have been aware for a long time that Gun-Free Zones were harmful, but insist that the only cure for the problem is a bigger Gun-Free Zone.
It is similar to how we insist that the economic harm done by taxation may be remedied by increasing taxation, or the harm done by an oppressive police state may be repaired by a totalitarian police state.
Masterskrain about 7 years ago
This is incredibly sad, since itâs SO DAMN TRUE!!!
Linguist about 7 years ago
If it werenât so scarily close to the truth, this would be funny butâŚ
.
NRA = NATION of RABID A$$HOLES
And before anyone gets on my case, Iâve been a licensed firearms owner and instructor for most of my life, and YES, the U.S, needs to divest itself of the influence of the NRA and YES, the U.S. needs to have better firearms regulations and controls, and NO, an 18 year old civilian doesnât need to own an AR15 rifle !
Packratjohn Premium Member about 7 years ago
I can see the headlines, âRandom and Trained Teachers are now Armed!â
I can also see the next tragedy, âGunman Kills 23 Teachersâ
Itâs simple I think. If the murderer knows the teacher may be armed, who will he shoot first? The teachers, as any good teacher would, will be protecting the kids first, not roaming the halls looking for a shootout. That gives the killer ample time to choose his targets. No folks, it wonât help. It MIGHT reduce the number of killed and wounded, MAYBE.
I can hear the teacher say, âStay here and keep your heads down, I have to go shoot someone.â
The only solution, since we can not completely eliminate firearms, is to keep the hideous things out of our schools by whatever means necessary. For that, I would pay more in taxes. Arming teachers? Not.
Godfreydaniel about 7 years ago
You might as well shoot Alex Jones in the headâafter all, thereâs nothing IN there!
feverjr Premium Member about 7 years ago
When Trump first came down the escalator to announce he was running for President, those were all paid actors holding signs and cheering, that was not a grassroots uprising.
Liverlips McCracken Premium Member about 7 years ago
The folks who claim all these mass shootings are fake are one of two things; Russian bots or actual individuals who are beneath contempt.
Jesy Bertz Premium Member about 7 years ago
This is brilliant, Ruben! Itâs a distillation of every far-right lunacy polluting the Internet. Are you a Russian?
braindead Premium Member about 7 years ago
Kids who survived and are speaking out are being called âcrisis actorsâ and are receiving death threats.
.
Why do Trump Disciples have to lie about every issue?
Teto85 Premium Member about 7 years ago
DONâT GIVE THEM ANY IDEAS!!!!