Good job Carmen. Vital American principles: due process, face your accuser, credible evidence, innocent u til proven guilty. In other words, RULE OF LAW AND EQUAL JUSTICE!
Kids in jail, protesters murdered by “very nice” Nazis, lock her up, second amendment solutions, “release those emails, Putin”, blatant violation of the emolument clause, refusal to release tax returns, firing Comey because he wouldn’t “go easy” on a confessed guilty traitor, Campaign chair guilty. Personal attorney, guilty. National Security adviser, guilty.
There may not yet be a trial by jury (please, let’s have at least one of those), but there is sure enough to justify impeachment and removal from office. So, yeah. J’accuse.
Well, considering that a Senate Confirmation is NOT a court trial and DOES NOT bear the same burden of proof, no, I don’t need to PROVE anything. It’s a job interview and he’s UNFIT. I’m not sending him to prison, I’m simply uncomfortable giving him the job. Prove he’s not and I’ll apologize.
I am amazed that there is anyone, even a democrat, who thinks Sotomayor is more qualified to be on the court than Kavanaugh. Talking about looking through the wrong end of the telescope.
amethyst52 Premium Member almost 6 years ago
Dios Mio.
Tue Elung-Jensen almost 6 years ago
Don´t she know it doesn´t work like that – at least not with irrational people. So lucky he isn´t all that irrational.
Brain Pudding almost 6 years ago
Good job Carmen. Vital American principles: due process, face your accuser, credible evidence, innocent u til proven guilty. In other words, RULE OF LAW AND EQUAL JUSTICE!
twclix almost 6 years ago
Kids in jail, protesters murdered by “very nice” Nazis, lock her up, second amendment solutions, “release those emails, Putin”, blatant violation of the emolument clause, refusal to release tax returns, firing Comey because he wouldn’t “go easy” on a confessed guilty traitor, Campaign chair guilty. Personal attorney, guilty. National Security adviser, guilty.
There may not yet be a trial by jury (please, let’s have at least one of those), but there is sure enough to justify impeachment and removal from office. So, yeah. J’accuse.
Durak Premium Member almost 6 years ago
Well, considering that a Senate Confirmation is NOT a court trial and DOES NOT bear the same burden of proof, no, I don’t need to PROVE anything. It’s a job interview and he’s UNFIT. I’m not sending him to prison, I’m simply uncomfortable giving him the job. Prove he’s not and I’ll apologize.
braindead Premium Member almost 6 years ago
See, “proof” is one of them words that only applies in certain situations.
Like when a Republican judge is nominated to the Supreme Court, and perjures himself on live TV, well, that’s no proof of anything.
.
But 17 Congressional hearings? Absolute proof! She must have done something wrong. Lock her up!
.
And whenever there is NO proof of say, collusion, then there is obviously no need for investigations of any sort.
.
#TraitorTrump
martens almost 6 years ago
Proof? Who needs stinkin’ proof? Not Trump…
Trump’s ‘rogue killers’ line is a reminder of his consistent bad faith in demanding proof.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/10/15/trumps-rogue-killers-line-is-reminder-his-consistent-bad-faith-demanding-proof/
jbmlaw01 almost 6 years ago
I am amazed that there is anyone, even a democrat, who thinks Sotomayor is more qualified to be on the court than Kavanaugh. Talking about looking through the wrong end of the telescope.
kaffekup almost 6 years ago
And after all this discussion, all you’ll hear from any republican is “You didn’t prove him guilty, so there! You’re the guilty ones!”
We need a smarter class of trolls, these are just boring.