The sad thing is that Rummy is not an advocate of a constitutionally limited government, as the administration he was in fought long and hard to get around the constitution to:
1) Get elected
2) Protect “National Secrets”
3) Conduct illegal investigations in the name of the “War on Terror”
Rights and Reason were all in the way of Rummy and company, so they ran right over them.
The Bush admin. did NOT want to win this war… they just wanted it to go on and on and on and on…. that’s why they did nothing to try and capture Bin Ladin. pschearer is just another tea bag cheerleader!
If the Bush administration didn’t want to win the war, they certainly had had some good insight into how to achieve that goal when during the Clinton administration, Bin Laden was in our sights on 3 specific occasions, and our Commander In Chief was more worried about getting his cigar smoked than affairs of state.
GES Who , is that you Al? Are you still whining about the Election, what was it 10 years ago? And here I thought you had taken your ball and gone home. Guess I was mistaken. Bunch of whiny leftist liberals. I bet Neville Chamberlain is one of your heroes isn’t he?
Neo, I see you don’t dispute my other statements. Whiny neo-con. I’m a real Conservative, when it comes to finances, not some fake NEO thing. Thanks for taking on only one little part of my argument and running with it. It’s the only part that lead to all the others, which, I suppose, you agree with.
Have fun trying to get your constitution back, jackwagon.
pschearer Premium Member over 13 years ago
If we had fought these wars to win and had won, the Left would still oppose them. That’s their nature.
junco49 over 13 years ago
And what we are all wondering is: What is the nature of pschearer?
pschearer Premium Member over 13 years ago
He’s an advocate of reason, rights, and constitutionally limited government. And you?
charles swartout Premium Member over 13 years ago
So democracy is now defined as civil unrest as opposed to elections? Or have you missed those that have been held in Iraq?
GESWho over 13 years ago
The sad thing is that Rummy is not an advocate of a constitutionally limited government, as the administration he was in fought long and hard to get around the constitution to: 1) Get elected 2) Protect “National Secrets” 3) Conduct illegal investigations in the name of the “War on Terror”
Rights and Reason were all in the way of Rummy and company, so they ran right over them.
nerual53 Premium Member over 13 years ago
The Bush admin. did NOT want to win this war… they just wanted it to go on and on and on and on…. that’s why they did nothing to try and capture Bin Ladin. pschearer is just another tea bag cheerleader!
MisngNOLA over 13 years ago
If the Bush administration didn’t want to win the war, they certainly had had some good insight into how to achieve that goal when during the Clinton administration, Bin Laden was in our sights on 3 specific occasions, and our Commander In Chief was more worried about getting his cigar smoked than affairs of state.
steelersneo over 13 years ago
GES Who , is that you Al? Are you still whining about the Election, what was it 10 years ago? And here I thought you had taken your ball and gone home. Guess I was mistaken. Bunch of whiny leftist liberals. I bet Neville Chamberlain is one of your heroes isn’t he?
lewisbower over 13 years ago
If Chamberlain had not been pushed out of office by the bully Churchil, most of the world would be united under one flag.
GESWho over 13 years ago
Neo, I see you don’t dispute my other statements. Whiny neo-con. I’m a real Conservative, when it comes to finances, not some fake NEO thing. Thanks for taking on only one little part of my argument and running with it. It’s the only part that lead to all the others, which, I suppose, you agree with.
Have fun trying to get your constitution back, jackwagon.