Lewreader said, about 6 hours ago
They still have court stenographers although Edison invented recorded voice. Go Union!
However it would STILL have to be transcribed by someone onto paper. Recordings can lose info that can only be caught at the time of actual speaking. I’ve heard many recordings of meetings where someone bumped a microphone and blotted out what someone else was saying.
I think this is quite necessary for proper records of what was said.
And no, I’m not a court reporter, stenographer, etc., nor do I know any (that I know of).
margueritem over 13 years ago
Too much!
Coyoty Premium Member over 13 years ago
You don’t pay her, the government does. Or would, if this were a real court.
Elaine Rosco Premium Member over 13 years ago
Rory is into this justice stuff…first a cop now a judge.
wndrwrthg over 13 years ago
The government may pay them, but they own the rights to what they type and you must pay them for any copies. Court reporting is a great scam.
lewisbower over 13 years ago
They still have court stenographers although Edison invented recorded voice. Go Union!
Dry and Dusty Premium Member over 13 years ago
That’s shorthand, don’t you know shorthand?
Digital Frog over 13 years ago
She’s texting in bl33t speak
odeliasimone over 13 years ago
She typed it in hoof speak.
Destiny23 over 13 years ago
That’s shorthoof, Dry.
And you try typing with hooves!!
hopeandjoy2 over 13 years ago
Sometimes it is best not to make a request.
GESWho over 13 years ago
Lewreader said, about 6 hours ago They still have court stenographers although Edison invented recorded voice. Go Union!
However it would STILL have to be transcribed by someone onto paper. Recordings can lose info that can only be caught at the time of actual speaking. I’ve heard many recordings of meetings where someone bumped a microphone and blotted out what someone else was saying.
I think this is quite necessary for proper records of what was said.
And no, I’m not a court reporter, stenographer, etc., nor do I know any (that I know of).