Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
@ghostkeeper: Iâd go more âhow about a cannon versus Canonsâ? But leave the Canons alone! Including a new T2i, I have five, though two of them are spare parts at the moment.
The other day I saw Part 3 of the revived âUpstairs, Downstairsâ. The dead-on depiction of Wallis Simpson in Part 2 was priceless, even if way too short. I hope they continue the series beyond the initial three parts.
(As for Royalists, I once read John Lockeâs argument against hereditary royalty. It was true then and is true now. It doesnât get much mention, but IMO the U.S. Constitutionâs ban on titles, based on the Declarationâs principle that âall men are created equalâ, is even more important than the separation of powers in defining America. Sorry Vicky, but if I were a Brit, Iâd be a small-r republican.)
pschearer, I agree that (thoâ U/D is not up to the standards of the original, it was very pleasing) and Iâd also like more episodes- although I was born 1937 and I know we had many issues to deal with in those years. I have not âsaved the show to DVD, but enjoyed it!
I read somewhere that the real reason the British government didnât want Wallis Simpson to marry the king was because she was too pro-German, which given what the men of Munich were about to do showed just what a big Nazi sympathizer she was.
pcolli almost 14 years ago
I am a Brit, a Royalist and all for festivity BUT itâs not my wedding and I resent the media telling me that I MUST be excited about it.
Just let them get on with their own lives and Iâll get on with mine.
WayneZombie almost 14 years ago
@ghostkeeper: Iâd go more âhow about a cannon versus Canonsâ? But leave the Canons alone! Including a new T2i, I have five, though two of them are spare parts at the moment.
pschearer Premium Member almost 14 years ago
The other day I saw Part 3 of the revived âUpstairs, Downstairsâ. The dead-on depiction of Wallis Simpson in Part 2 was priceless, even if way too short. I hope they continue the series beyond the initial three parts.
(As for Royalists, I once read John Lockeâs argument against hereditary royalty. It was true then and is true now. It doesnât get much mention, but IMO the U.S. Constitutionâs ban on titles, based on the Declarationâs principle that âall men are created equalâ, is even more important than the separation of powers in defining America. Sorry Vicky, but if I were a Brit, Iâd be a small-r republican.)
cwreenactor almost 14 years ago
LOL!!!!
vldazzle almost 14 years ago
pschearer, I agree that (thoâ U/D is not up to the standards of the original, it was very pleasing) and Iâd also like more episodes- although I was born 1937 and I know we had many issues to deal with in those years. I have not âsaved the show to DVD, but enjoyed it!
mdblanche almost 14 years ago
I read somewhere that the real reason the British government didnât want Wallis Simpson to marry the king was because she was too pro-German, which given what the men of Munich were about to do showed just what a big Nazi sympathizer she was.