Neither the film nor the very early digital imaging equipment had the ability to capture starlight in fractions of a second. It took extended times to get those to show up. Meanwhile, the reason for taking the images was to record the activities of the Humans there, not the presence of the stars.
This is a really good example of a conspiracy theory that is based on a lack of knowledge and understanding about the realities of the changes in the levels and capabilities of technology.
SrTechWriter 8 months ago
Neither the film nor the very early digital imaging equipment had the ability to capture starlight in fractions of a second. It took extended times to get those to show up. Meanwhile, the reason for taking the images was to record the activities of the Humans there, not the presence of the stars.
This is a really good example of a conspiracy theory that is based on a lack of knowledge and understanding about the realities of the changes in the levels and capabilities of technology.
markkahler52 8 months ago
K, folks, help fill in the blank: We can hurtle people and objects throughout and out of our solar system, but______
kenharkins 8 months ago
It was actually a Hassleblad.
MS72 8 months ago
There were 2 cameras for Apollo 11, specially built around the Hasselblad 500EL body.
timinwsac Premium Member 8 months ago
The Apollo astronauts carried slide rules with them on the missions.