Dog Eat Doug by Brian Anderson for May 21, 2009

  1. 5346ae65734b4d0e82350407ef0d8e00 250
    cleokaya  over 15 years ago

    Yes Sophie. In simple terms…keep your mouth shut. Ha, ha! I guess that also pertains to the pork chops.

     •  Reply
  2. Emerald
    margueritem  over 15 years ago

    Doug has no teeth, Sophie, bad choice of someone to blame….

     •  Reply
  3. Flash
    pschearer Premium Member over 15 years ago

    The word you wanted was “implying”, not “inferring”. Dumb dog!

     •  Reply
  4. 182837main berazy 330 earth rise
    annecomeau1  over 15 years ago

    Hey…I bought Sophie’s argument. Seemed like a good response for a sticky situation (even though Doug has no teeth..he is very tenacious) Talking dogs rule - and drool.

     •  Reply
  5. Ben pawst
    serenasakitty  over 15 years ago

    Luv it! Luv it!

     •  Reply
  6. Mountain lynx
    Shikamoo Premium Member over 15 years ago

    You’re right pshearer: It should be “Are you inferring that I am guilty of taking two pork chops?” Infer; “to conclude, deduce” -Webster’s Dictionary.

    Doug keeps trying to teach Sophie, but Sophie won’t listen!

     •  Reply
  7. Mountain lynx
    Shikamoo Premium Member over 15 years ago

    pookid54: A wild tail-wagging, drooling “woof!”

     •  Reply
  8. 00000
    alondra  over 15 years ago

    Never mind Sophie, that corner looks rather comfortable. Just take a nap.

     •  Reply
  9. Avatar bw 100x100
    brian anderson creator over 15 years ago

    No actually, I wanted “inferring” which is used when drawing conclusions that are not explicit in what is said. Technically you could get away with “implying”, however its usage is slightly different and it’s also over used and cliche.

    See, Sophie is actually smart enough to know the difference.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Dog Eat Doug