Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly for September 04, 2009

  1. But eo
    Rakkav  about 15 years ago

    Oy…

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    EarlWash  about 15 years ago

    That one ‘flu’ over the coocoo’s nest.

     •  Reply
  3. Stewiebrian
    pouncingtiger  about 15 years ago

    I didn’t expectorate that.

     •  Reply
  4. Veggie tales
    Yukoner  about 15 years ago

    Stop one of the wars. There would be sufficient funds and some left over.

     •  Reply
  5. Hyacinth macaw
    sjoujke  about 15 years ago

    Looks like taxation is reaching a fever pitch.

     •  Reply
  6. 64449 wallpaper400
    Ronshua  about 15 years ago

    Fleecing us sheep , we’ll all have influenza .

     •  Reply
  7. Artrazz 2
    fredbuhl  about 15 years ago

    He’s such a phlegm-boyant spender, it snot even funny.

     •  Reply
  8. Anishnawbe
    Allan CB Premium Member about 15 years ago

    It’s the cold reality of life … everything is feverishly taxed now a days. As Mr. T would say I PITY THE FLU!

     •  Reply
  9. Keithmoon
    Wildcard24365  about 15 years ago

    Hey! There’s no RHEUM for this kind of sick humor!

    Gyawd… I just can’t HACK it…

     •  Reply
  10. Txflag icon150
    mccrearyk  about 15 years ago

    EarlWash said: “That one ‘flu’ over the coocoo’s nest.”

    Nah, that would be ‘bird flu,’ the hysteria over which has pretty much died out. No money in that.

    Swine flu (as in, “When pigs flu!”) is another story altogether!

     •  Reply
  11. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member about 15 years ago

    We don’t have enough wars to stop to get the required funds. Medicare alone cost $386 billion last year, and that’s a drop in the bucket compared to nationalizing the rest of health care coverage.

     •  Reply
  12. Real government
    CogentModality  about 15 years ago

    Man, that was a cold shot.

     •  Reply
  13. Large pumpkin in window
    Dkram  about 15 years ago

    0.o All puns intended right?

     •  Reply
  14. Baby angel with roses a
    Ushindi  about 15 years ago

    AKH: (When the Iraq war was estimated to cost $1.2 trillion overall - the estimates are higher now, of course)

    ” For starters, $1.2 trillion would pay for an unprecedented public health campaign — a doubling of cancer research funding, treatment for every American whose diabetes or heart disease is now going unmanaged and a global immunization campaign to save millions of children’s lives.

    Combined, the cost of running those programs for a decade wouldn’t use up even half our money pot. So we could then turn to poverty and education, starting with universal preschool for every 3- and 4-year-old child across the country. The city of New Orleans could also receive a huge increase in reconstruction funds.

    The final big chunk of the money could go to national security. The recommendations of the 9/11 Commission that have not been put in place — better baggage and cargo screening, stronger measures against nuclear proliferation — could be enacted. Financing for the war in Afghanistan could be increased to beat back the Taliban’s recent gains, and a peacekeeping force could put a stop to the genocide in Darfur.”

    Obviously, that didn’t happen - we’re still paying for the war, and will be for a long time to come - this is all borrowed money, remember.

     •  Reply
  15. Artrazz 2
    fredbuhl  about 15 years ago

    Please save that “discussion” for the political cartoons page. If I’m in the mood for pseudo- intellectual drivel I’ll look there.

     •  Reply
  16. Baby angel with roses a
    Ushindi  about 15 years ago

    fredbuhl: I think you vastly overrate the importance of your opinion to others, and speaking of “drivel”……

    Edit: Don’t misunderstand - I have no problem with your right to disagree with my ideas or opinions. What I DO disagree with is you deciding WHAT I should post, which comments I make are acceptable. I will post what I want, as does everyone else, regardless of whether or not you wish to read it. That’s my say on the subject.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    Claire Jordan  about 15 years ago

    Thing is, as individuals you’ll probably be better off with state health care. To start with, if you had cheaper healthcare and prescriptions in the US, then the pharmacies would stop charging you up to five times what people in other countries pay for the same medicines, because they would know that - as happens here in the UK - if they charged too much you would just go to your GP and ask for a prescription. So you would save money there to start with.

    You won’t actually end up paying much more, unless you are earning good money but living without any health insurance. What the NHS is is basically an insurance firm owned by the government, and you don’t need any other. The only thing private healthcare does better here is long-term rehab. for drug addiction etc, and really non-urgent things like tattoo removal. For anything life-threatening, the NHS does it better anyway - and although you have to pay more taxes you save by not needing to pay for private insurance. Or if your company was paying for your health insurance, then it won’t have to anymore, so it will be able to pay you a higher salary.

    Those of you who think you can manage with no health insurance policy, so that having to pay for one would be an imposition, consider that unless you meet with an accident and die young, one day you will be old and frail and not a wage-earner - and then it’s going to be too late to buy private insurance, so you’ll either die or become a charity case and a burden on the state.

    Two years ago a mate of mine (the real-life model on whom Snape in the Harry Potter books was based), who was 68 at the time, had £100,000-worth of state-of-the-art, specialised cancer surgery which could not have been done better anywhere in the world and he says that he couldn’t imagine better care. As a retired teacher nearing seventy, if he’d been in the US I would expect that either he wouldn’t have been able to afford the insurance that would cover that sort of surgery, or if he could then it would have cost him much more than his National Insurance contributions ever did.

     •  Reply
  18. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member about 15 years ago

    Ushindi can’t do accounting. Regarding costs, you compare fixed to fixed and variable to variable, not fixed to variable.

    Iraq isn’t a fixed cost. It costs $200 billion annually (1.2 trillion / six years). The current Medicare budget exceeds that figure by 93%. You think a single-payer or other form of socialized medicine can be done that cheaply in a nation as large as the US???

    We’ve got entitlement programs stretched way beyond the nation’s ability to pay for them already, even without wars.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Shoe