Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly for November 05, 2009

  1. Stewiebrian
    pouncingtiger  almost 15 years ago

    OUCH!! What a burn!

     •  Reply
  2. Veggie tales
    Yukoner  almost 15 years ago

    Ah, but which half?

     •  Reply
  3. Hyacinth macaw
    sjoujke  almost 15 years ago

    Now that’s a low blow!

     •  Reply
  4. Globe eagle anchor
    ben_david  almost 15 years ago

    Wow! Even the birds don’t use proper English. You wouldn’t say “I see I,” so why say “I see you and I?”

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Allison Nunn Premium Member almost 15 years ago

    it is an unfortunate sign of the way English is now being taught to children. They honestly don’t know any better (and they certainly don’t have good roll models in the media!)

     •  Reply
  6. D and d bed 03sc
    Ray_C  almost 15 years ago

    I agree with you both. Kids also need better role models for spelling.

    ;-)

     •  Reply
  7. Phil b r
    pbarnrob  almost 15 years ago

    And Shoe works where again? Sheesh!

     •  Reply
  8. Real government
    CogentModality  almost 15 years ago

    So what would be proper? Us? We two? You certainly couldn’t say “I see me being happy together.” LOL

     •  Reply
  9. Anishnawbe
    Allan CB Premium Member almost 15 years ago

    According to Microsoft Word (they can’t be wrong! haha)

    “I see you and me being happy together” “I see you and I being happy together.”

    are both ‘correct’. I’m sure if we search Google, we’ll find someone to say neither is correct.

     •  Reply
  10. Cropit
    l-empress  almost 15 years ago

    I see YOU. You see ME. That’s how it works. Do you know how to diagram a sentence? If you did, there wouldn’t even be a question.

    The only reason you wouldn’t say “I see me…” is that it becomes reflexive. Thus you would say, “I see myself…”

    I don’t know why I bother. I’m used to people who don’t know and care less.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    jrbj  almost 15 years ago

    How about “I see us being happy together”?

     •  Reply
  12. 1883820.560055 1
    KelleyCooper  almost 15 years ago

    I’m still laughing about ‘roll model’…I guess you find those in a bakery shop window…or maybe, a Tonka truck is a roll model…omg….

     •  Reply
  13. Mer rover small 02
    treBsdrawkcaB  almost 15 years ago

    It doesn’t make any sense! How could Shoe be 1/2 right? If he sees only one of them happy “together”?!? Together with what / whom? If it’s only one of them, he/she can’t be “together” alone.

    Maybe it’s a Paul Aldrich kinda thing…

    (Solo comedian/musician who published an album where’s he’s playing four instruments titled, “Paul Aldrich: Together Again”.

     •  Reply
  14. Picture 001
    rshive  almost 15 years ago

    Yukoner beat me to the punch–which half?

     •  Reply
  15. Phonepic3altered4
    yyyguy  almost 15 years ago

    imagine me and you, and you and me…

     •  Reply
  16. D and d bed 03sc
    Ray_C  almost 15 years ago

    I-empress: I am with you on that. However, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I am willing to put.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    Boopsie200  almost 15 years ago

    Hmmm. Maybe it should be, “I can see our being happy together.”

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    1deano  almost 15 years ago

    Isn’t 1/2 of 1/2 equal to a quarter? that’s all she’s worth?

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    artisanx  almost 15 years ago

    I can see that all of you are unhappy altogether! IT’S A COMIC STRIP, PEOPLE! NOT AN ENGLISH LESSON! Can’t you just get a laugh and move on or do you have to dissect every little thing to satisfy some deep seated urge to prove that you’re right?!! Geez, GET A FUNNYBONE! (Thank you, doctor. I feel so much better now…)

     •  Reply
  20. Baby angel with roses a
    Ushindi  almost 15 years ago

    How about just “I’ll give you $50.” Forget the English problem.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Shoe