Hey…I bought Sophie’s argument. Seemed like a good response for a sticky situation (even though Doug has no teeth..he is very tenacious) Talking dogs rule - and drool.
No actually, I wanted “inferring” which is used when drawing conclusions that are not explicit in what is said. Technically you could get away with “implying”, however its usage is slightly different and it’s also over used and cliche.
See, Sophie is actually smart enough to know the difference.
cleokaya over 15 years ago
Yes Sophie. In simple terms…keep your mouth shut. Ha, ha! I guess that also pertains to the pork chops.
margueritem over 15 years ago
Doug has no teeth, Sophie, bad choice of someone to blame….
pschearer Premium Member over 15 years ago
The word you wanted was “implying”, not “inferring”. Dumb dog!
annecomeau1 over 15 years ago
Hey…I bought Sophie’s argument. Seemed like a good response for a sticky situation (even though Doug has no teeth..he is very tenacious) Talking dogs rule - and drool.
serenasakitty over 15 years ago
Luv it! Luv it!
Shikamoo Premium Member over 15 years ago
You’re right pshearer: It should be “Are you inferring that I am guilty of taking two pork chops?” Infer; “to conclude, deduce” -Webster’s Dictionary.
Doug keeps trying to teach Sophie, but Sophie won’t listen!
Shikamoo Premium Member over 15 years ago
pookid54: A wild tail-wagging, drooling “woof!”
alondra over 15 years ago
Never mind Sophie, that corner looks rather comfortable. Just take a nap.
brian anderson creator over 15 years ago
No actually, I wanted “inferring” which is used when drawing conclusions that are not explicit in what is said. Technically you could get away with “implying”, however its usage is slightly different and it’s also over used and cliche.
See, Sophie is actually smart enough to know the difference.