Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for December 15, 2008

  1. Tartan colorado
    oranaiche  almost 16 years ago

    Sadly true.

     •  Reply
  2. 310
    okzack  almost 16 years ago

    Sign of the times, unfortunely.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    mfboyd  almost 16 years ago

    actually, this is rather timeless, and all the sadder for it.

     •  Reply
  4. N750606063 6150
    ayln  almost 16 years ago

    top management just don’t see the problem with themselves.. since they wouldn’t fire themselves, what’s a better than blaming the little guys down there.

    the heli pad is a nice touch.. i wonder if companies like the big 3 have a few next to their jets..

     •  Reply
  5. Wargob
    gbrucewilson  almost 16 years ago

    Anyone heard of the “Peter Principle”? It is working well at the Big 3 and a lot of other companies.

     •  Reply
  6. Rocky bw 2 090507
    BirishB  almost 16 years ago

    Yeah, the CEOs of the Big 3 have plenty to be sorry about, and this comic surely gets a lot of things right … but I’m dissapointed that UAW wouldn’t negotiate with Congress in the interest of the bailout loan – this was labor’s opportunity to show that extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures, and it failed. Miserably.

     •  Reply
  7. 05 17 07a
    royman53  almost 16 years ago

    What cracks me up is Bob Nardelli almost bankrupted Home Depot and still Chrysler hired him!

     •  Reply
  8. Buddy
    lalas  almost 16 years ago

    Funny how most of the Republicans against the LOANS (not a bailout) come from states that have foreign car makers in their states.

     •  Reply
  9. J0262810
    Wildmustang1262  almost 16 years ago

    okzack says: Sign of the times, unfortunely The word should be “unfortunately” correctly. :-)

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    robertolopez144  almost 16 years ago

    “You Are So Right, Mr. Wiley!”

     •  Reply
  11. Th giraffe
    lazygrazer  almost 16 years ago

    The perfect head shot, Wiley.

     •  Reply
  12. Water lilies
    Preschus3  almost 16 years ago

    more truth then realized!

     •  Reply
  13. Hawaii5 0girl
    treered  almost 16 years ago

    remember the golden rule: he who has the gold makes the rules

     •  Reply
  14. Redfoxava
    reynard61  almost 16 years ago

    BirishB: “(…)I’m dissapointed that UAW wouldn’t negotiate with Congress in the interest of the bailout loan(…)”

    The U.A.W. has already made huge concessions, and they’ve said that they’re willing to make more – so long as their current contracts are honored and their members are paid a living wage. It isn’t *THEIR* fault that the Big Three kept insisting that they build SUVs and other gas-guzzlers that no one would buy eventually. (Believe me, I have absolutely **NO** sympathy for the auto execs! They should all be fired and investigated by Congress [for incompetence] and the Justice Department. [For stock fraud.]) The only thing that those Southern Rethuglicans are interested in is busting the U.A.W. for the Japanese and German automakers, and they’re more than willing to sacrifice the U.S. auto industry (and the million-plus jobs that they provide) in order to do so.

     •  Reply
  15. Rocky bw 2 090507
    BirishB  almost 16 years ago

    Reynard – Suppose I ought to clarify: I STRONGLY support union labor; I abhor corporate/CEO greed. However, I feel that UAW ineptly handled the negotiations, and now the GOP and UAW are now in a pissing contest over who deserves blame, but that only detracts from the fact that nothing got done. I also think that UAW should have looked a little harder at the unpalatable solution it was faced with rather than ducking the conversation.

     •  Reply
  16. Turtle
    McGuffin  almost 16 years ago
    maths
     •  Reply
  17. Alife
    alife  almost 16 years ago

    TOO many Chiefs not enough Indians:D

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    candlebizlady  almost 16 years ago

    Bingo!!!

     •  Reply
  19. Anim chromosomes
    chromosome Premium Member almost 16 years ago

    I agree with you, lalas.

     •  Reply
  20. Dscf0004
    ninmas  almost 16 years ago

    danae hasn’t appeared in weeks!

     •  Reply
  21. Redfoxava
    reynard61  almost 16 years ago

    LameRandomName: “Southern Rethuglicans forcing the poor, downtrodden masses to produce SUVs and other gas guzzlers to bankrupt the big three on behalf of the japanese car makers?”

    No. That’s NOT what I said. To clarify: The Big Three’s Marketing suits kept telling their CEOs that the “Public” wanted SUVs, pick-ups and large cars – usually to the near-exclusion of smaller, gas-efficient models. The CEOs then decided which models went from the drawing boards to the assembly lines. No one “force”ed the assembly-line workers to build them, but they had no decision-making power as to what models went to the assembly lines.

    “And here I thought that they were building SUVs and other large cars because that’s what their customers wanted to BUY.”

    I strongly suspect that it’s more a case of what they think “the customer wants” (i.e. what they can make that will make the average male driver feel like a Chick Magnet) and through slick advertising turning it into a self-fulfilling prophesy.

    “Shows how little I know. Hey, you guys keep fighting for that ‘Living Wage’!”

    Would you rather see (possibly) a million-plus people homeless and/or swelling the welfare and food-stamp rolls because they can’t afford their mortgage payments and/or their next meal?

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    Creamed  almost 16 years ago

    According to Time magazine, GM’s union workers make $71/hr plus benefits. That’s approximately $147K in “living wages.” Many other Americans would like to earn that amount and still be disgruntled.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    mike.jones  almost 16 years ago

    That “$71/hour” figure is accurate if you’re looking at “total labor cost”, but it’s not what the workers are making. It’s what you get if you take all the labor cost, including the pensions and benefits being paid to current retirees and divide that by the number of current workers. Nobody on the assembly line is making $71/hour. Oh, and before you get bent out of shape about “why are they paying such lavish benefits to retireees?”, here’s why: they promised those benefits to them when they were workers in exchange for taking lower salaries at the time. If GM had fully funded the pension plan as they accrued the liabilities, there wouldn’t *be* a pension problem. But for some reason, it’s become attractive to blame the union for expecting GM to hold up their end of a deal that both sides agreed to.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    nonsequitous  almost 16 years ago

    okzack says: Sign of the times, unfortunely The word should be “unfortunately” correctly. :-) No, I think okzack had it right.

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    nonsequitous  almost 16 years ago

    “…the poor, downtrodden masses … fighting for that “Living Wage”… bankrupt the big three … Shows how little I know. ”

    I can’t argue with that.

    “Are there no food stamps? Are there no homeless shelters? If the laid-off be like to die, then let them do it and decrease the surplus population.” – Ebenezer “Lame Random Comment” Scrooge

     •  Reply
  26. Screaming
    Tommygunner  almost 12 years ago

    Yes, sadly true.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur