I’ve been part of a jury….Getting twelve people to agree on even the most obvious of facts is impossible….Cat wrangling comes to mind….I’m surprised that anybody is ever convicted……Seriously, people all you have to do is convince one person there is some doubt, and you walz away Scott free…..
There was one lady that agreed that the guy beat the other guy in the face with a 2 by 4, and almost killed him, but thought he would change his ways, and another guy who said the victim deserved what he got… They both would not accept the blood on the 2 by 4 was the victims….They didn’t have the DNA…..The judge told us later that shows like CSI have changed jurors expectations….Witness accounts are less believable…If they had done the DNA on the blood on the 2 by 4 the assholes would changed their vote…. ……… Be not proud of the our jury system……. but it is the best there is….
Judge: “Tell them that if they still have money in their pockets that there’s something wrong with the system. Collect the coin and put it in the tip jar with the others.”
The judge should go to the bailiff and whisper in his ear " Heads is guilty,tails is not innocent,tee time in one hour " Hey it seems that way some times….depending…if you know what I mean.
They weren’t mentioned in the trial & you can’t always tell, especially depending on the quality of the surgeon, the type & shape of the implants & the clothing worn at that time!
Hey, better that than taking your chances with twelve people picked by liars,… err… lawyers for their malleability, lack of intelligence, and having nothing better to do than sit through a trial…
We will require both a goat and a chicken. Jury duty is too serious a matter to be left to the reading of only one set of entrails. And if you could scare up a grill and a keg of beer, that would be great.
Superfrog over 10 years ago
For goodness sake. Surely that’s for the foreman to decide.
Meh~tdology, fka Pepelaputr over 10 years ago
Float is guilty, drown is not guilty.
Varnes over 10 years ago
I’ve been part of a jury….Getting twelve people to agree on even the most obvious of facts is impossible….Cat wrangling comes to mind….I’m surprised that anybody is ever convicted……Seriously, people all you have to do is convince one person there is some doubt, and you walz away Scott free…..
Varnes over 10 years ago
There was one lady that agreed that the guy beat the other guy in the face with a 2 by 4, and almost killed him, but thought he would change his ways, and another guy who said the victim deserved what he got… They both would not accept the blood on the 2 by 4 was the victims….They didn’t have the DNA…..The judge told us later that shows like CSI have changed jurors expectations….Witness accounts are less believable…If they had done the DNA on the blood on the 2 by 4 the assholes would changed their vote…. ……… Be not proud of the our jury system……. but it is the best there is….
Ida No over 10 years ago
Judge: “Tell them that if they still have money in their pockets that there’s something wrong with the system. Collect the coin and put it in the tip jar with the others.”
keenanthelibrarian over 10 years ago
Are we saying that jujes’ considerations are worked out on the toss of a coin?? I always thought so! How cinical of me.
Guilty Bystander over 10 years ago
As if judges are flawless and above incompetence and/or corruption.
vwdualnomand over 10 years ago
corporations are people.
dabugger over 10 years ago
Yes, that is why some we know of walked.
watmiwori over 10 years ago
gelt gilt. always has, always will.
jamesgilbreth over 10 years ago
At least that way, you’d have an even chance.
mourdac Premium Member over 10 years ago
make sure one of the lawyers doesn’t nab the coin after they’re done with it
Caddy57 over 10 years ago
The judge should go to the bailiff and whisper in his ear " Heads is guilty,tails is not innocent,tee time in one hour " Hey it seems that way some times….depending…if you know what I mean.
Caddy57 over 10 years ago
And what would that one judge, the one with mental issues have said? “Off with their heads” speaking of course of the jury, not the accused.
neeeurothrush over 10 years ago
civil or criminal? it makes a difference
strictures over 10 years ago
They weren’t mentioned in the trial & you can’t always tell, especially depending on the quality of the surgeon, the type & shape of the implants & the clothing worn at that time!
Dr_Fogg over 10 years ago
Public hangings?
Enoki over 10 years ago
Hey, better that than taking your chances with twelve people picked by liars,… err… lawyers for their malleability, lack of intelligence, and having nothing better to do than sit through a trial…
omgomg over 10 years ago
@ Tigger O.J.’s blood was NOT found at the crime scene. In the words of Rep. Joe Wilson, You LIE.
Brass Orchid Premium Member over 10 years ago
We will require both a goat and a chicken. Jury duty is too serious a matter to be left to the reading of only one set of entrails. And if you could scare up a grill and a keg of beer, that would be great.
Fan o’ Lio. over 10 years ago
Give him a fair trial then take him out and hang him.
MsMistoffeles14 over 10 years ago
This is actually possible given the quality of juries nowdays.
westny77 over 10 years ago
The jury is trying to tell you something Judge. They want to be disqualified.
nerual53 Premium Member over 10 years ago
Heads I win, Tails you lose