Baldo by Hector D. Cantú and Carlos Castellanos for August 03, 2009

  1. Emerald
    margueritem  over 15 years ago

    Huh?

     •  Reply
  2. J0262810
    Wildmustang1262  over 15 years ago

    Oh, That guy with his ugly appareance is such an annoying.

     •  Reply
  3. Tornado
    revtry  over 15 years ago

    We can always hope.

     •  Reply
  4. Lady with a bow
    ejcapulet  over 15 years ago

    Ooookay, ya had me, then ya lost me.

     •  Reply
  5. Pict0026
    caddy.1957  over 15 years ago

    See what happens when you have no standards

     •  Reply
  6. Avatar1   hobbes
    TapiocaHead  over 15 years ago

    Interesting rationalization or de-rationalizing….. Agree Gee1a.

    When a certain ethic group is down, why not keep them buried!

     •  Reply
  7. Av 5363
    prasrinivara  over 15 years ago

    Is that why some self-appointed “leaders” (such as Jesse Jackson and Looie Farakhan) specifically do this to their own, TapiocaHead?

     •  Reply
  8. Text if you d like to meet him
    Yukoneric  over 15 years ago

    Don’t leave out the Rednecks.

     •  Reply
  9. Nanny poo
    carmy  over 15 years ago

    I see his mouth moving, but I think he’s talking out of somewhere else.

     •  Reply
  10. Echo
    MotherOfMoses  over 15 years ago

    That’s why I chose not to be successful. I didn’t want to hurt my race. ;)

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    cford  over 15 years ago

    Nozzi, good point! LOL!

     •  Reply
  12. Trop light
    JonD17  over 15 years ago

    Jackson and Farakhan are the White designated self-appointed leaders more than anything else, Prasrinivara. And while we are at it, doesn’t nearly every ethnic group have Self-appointed leaders ? funny how your usage of two languages in one name comes across like childish name-calling.

     •  Reply
  13. Av 5363
    prasrinivara  over 15 years ago

    Name-calling (against TapiocaHead) was certainly not my intention, JonD17 (btw, I fixed the post). In the case of Farakhan….well, he’s one who is certainly not undeserving of such.

    You’re right about most groups having self-appointed leaders, having seen more than one of those in Calgary’s Indian-Canadian community (one actually tried in 1993 to tell people to vote for Liberals–I gave him a blunt refusal, saying “what business is it of yours to order people on how to vote in a democracy?”)

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    jmworacle  over 15 years ago

    Sotomayor is doing things the “correct” way (according to the liberal view). Should she expose a “conservative point of view she would be attacked.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    calvinsmom Premium Member over 15 years ago

    It is just as bigoted to vote FOR any person because of their race, ethnicity, gender, etc., as it is to vote AGAINST them for these reasons. These are simply facts of life, and do not confer good judgment, wisdom, fairness or any other desirable leadership trait. Martin Luther King said that he hoped to see the day when people would be judged on the “content of their character” instead of the color of their skin. That’s what keeps getting left behind in these discussions.

    That said, I am opposed to Sotomayor’s confirmation because I believe Supreme Court Justices should decide cases based on Constitutional law, not on personal experiences and “empathy”, whatever that means.

     •  Reply
  16. Trop light
    JonD17  over 15 years ago

    prasrinivara, thank you for the timely, courteous and thoughtful editing of your comment. Tho now that your statement has substantialy changed, it renders my response irrelevant and somewhat off-base, so be it, I like the tone of your revision much better than he original, thank you again.

     •  Reply
  17. Trop light
    JonD17  over 15 years ago

    GEE1A calls it right, all the way down the line.

     •  Reply
  18. Av 5363
    prasrinivara  over 15 years ago

    On the nail, Calvinsmum; voting for someone due to their race, gender, … or even because a self-appointed “leader” of your own community tells you to is IMO, insanity.

    (a little tidbit: in 1993, Canada’s Reform Party–now merged with PC’s as dominant partner of current Conservative Party–was seen by some Indian-Canadians including that Jacksonesque “leader” as racist; based on actual 1993-1997 Parliamentary representation–Reform had three Indian-Canadian MP’s, while majority Grits had only two–he wound up adding an entire poultry-farm’s production onto his face).

     •  Reply
  19. Peanut2
    kajunclown  over 15 years ago

    it’s a COMIC STRIP people…let it go.

     •  Reply
  20. 20141103 115559
    Potrzebie  over 15 years ago

    research Motley fools guys.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    unclebarney  over 15 years ago

    This toon is not racism, this toon is just plain prejudice, by the insinuation that Latinos are failures before they even start to perform a job.

     •  Reply
  22. Mannytherat
    KingRat  over 15 years ago

    it’s a tribute to Terry Gilliam’s The Adventures Of Baron Munchausen

    Horatio Jackson: Ah, the officer who risked his life by singlehandedly destroying… Functionary: [whispering in his ear] Six. Horatio Jackson: Six enemy cannon and rescuing… Functionary: Ten. Horatio Jackson: Ten of our men held captive by The Turk. Heroic Officer: Yes, sir. Horatio Jackson: The officer about whom we’ve heard so much. Heroic Officer: I suppose so, sir. Horatio Jackson: Always taking risks far beyond the call of duty. Heroic Officer: I only did my best, sir. Horatio Jackson: Have him executed at once. Soldier: Yes, sir. Come along. Horatio Jackson: This sort of behavior is demoralizing for the ordinary soldiers and citizens who are trying to lead normal, simple, unexceptional lives. I think things are difficult enough as it is without these emotional people rocking the boat.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Baldo