Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
Arlo and Janis by Jimmy Johnson for February 13, 2013
February 12, 2013
February 14, 2013
Transcript:
Arlo: Have you noticed how poor most made-for-TV animation is these days?
Arlo: So many shortcuts and tricks, all for the sake of expediency.
Arlo: Newspaper comic strips, the last bastion of quality cartooning.
If you look closely, the wall is actually various shades of white in each frame, giving each one a distinct look.Most people just arenât sophisticated enough to notice such intricacies (sarcasm, in case it wasnât obvious)
Sadly newspaper cartoons/comics met their match when the size kept shrinking (leading to Bill Wattersonâs many fights over size and his ultimate departure).
hmm, a little history is order here. With the advent of TV, stations needed filler and cartoons made for Movie Theaters fit the bill exactly. Just remember that those cartoons (Warner Bros, etc) were NOT made for children, but the stations plugged them in especially when children were watching. Thus a whole generation grew up on Road Runner and Tom and Jerry etc. (Disney kept their own to themselves on the Mickey Mouse Club). ButâŠ.some industry people realized that making cartoons that way for TV would be outrageously expensive (way to many cels to color), but didnât know what to do. Enter âCrusader Rabbitâ, the first animated cartoon made for TV which used the revolving background and really cut the number of cels to a minimum. And who were some of the illustrators working on Crusader? Hanna and Barbera, and with the advent of Quick Draw McGraw (and others) the rest is â sadly â history. I know, I watched Crusader in 1951-1952 when I was 4-5. It wasnât Mighty Mouse, but it was animation. What IS sad is the dumbing down of todayâs cartoons. Generations are growing up with insipid and trite presentations instead of very layered and textured cartoons with lots of subtle adult themes.
This comic strip today is so true. The cartoons I watched growing up are so superior to today excluding some animated movies of course. Those have improved greatly.
I looked again a few times, and this is correct. Looks like definitely an optical illusion. Compare each of the panel backgrounds separately to the white GoComics background instead of comparing them to each other. They are not different shades after all. Good call!
JJâs blog:âIt also was a gentle poke at a lot of comic-strip artists out there, particularly those who produce exclusively with digitial tools. You see a lot of it these days, identical panels except for the lettering and a few cosmetic tweaks from panel to panelâŠ.However, at Arlo & Janis we make cartoons the old-fashioned way. We grind them out with pen and ink.â
Whatâs interesting are the Tom & Jerry cartoons. When they moved production to Czechoslovakia, the animation and sound effects were so appalling that they moved it back to the states.When my kids (20 & 18 now) were little, we would watch the old animation from Disney, Hanna-Barbera and Warner. They enjoyed the old animation, the classical music and, believe it or not, having to think to get the joke. I never realized how fortunate I was to be exposed to the old classics until I realized how bad animation was getting and the fact that adults felt children werenât worth the effort.
@coz69 Clutch Cargo was my first thought as the absolute nadir of good cartooning. I watched an old episode a while back, and it was completely painful to watch.
Those old Warner Bros Merry-Melodies and Looney-Tunes, the old Popeye cartoons and Disneyâs movies like Dumbo etc. You canât beat those. Not just the artwork but the sneaky humour that was never intended for kids! These new things on Cartoon Network are awful!
Good animation comes and goes. Look at old Felix or Betty Boop cartoons and note all the repeated motions. Iâve been watching a disc full of Winsor McKay animations, which are amazingly sophisticated, but also make use of the shortcut of repeating frame sequences over and over.
For recent animation, see Tangled. Or contrast The Simpsons with South Park.
One of my pet peeves is the way that characters in Dreamworks, I believe it is, register astonishment and what- have-you. Always, always the same. According to my daughter, someone used motion-capture technology on an actor responding to something, and the same response has been used in perpetuity. If that isnât so, it certainly seems like it. Almost as bad is the way that animated characters seem to glide along as they walk. Canât someone program a computer to show something like a weighted person making an impression on what he/she waks on? @Dragon0131 said, âI never realized how fortunate I was to be exposed to the old classics until I realized how bad animation was getting and the fact that adults felt children werenât worth the effort.â I imagine that itâs that adults feel that children arenât worth the cost. Quality requires $$$.
Taking a page from the Garry Trudeau book, eh, JJ? I recall seeing a parody that actually did use the same panel over and over and over ⊠sorta like this strip.
Doonesbury did it deliberately, in homage to Jules Feiffer, who started it. BUT, they drew every panel. As for repeating backgrounds in animation, how about TV shows. Watch the credit roll on Taxi. Same strip repeated over and over.
Plus Charles Schulz did something similar in an early Peanuts cartoon, where he had Charlie Brown speaking paragraphs in each square, to make a point about strips that had too much dialogue.
bob_shaffer about 12 years ago
I saw what you did there, Jimmy⊠;)
peter about 12 years ago
And so did I :-)
wcorvi about 12 years ago
Uhhh, guys, every panel is identical except for the text.
kullyrai about 12 years ago
If you look closely, the wall is actually various shades of white in each frame, giving each one a distinct look.Most people just arenât sophisticated enough to notice such intricacies (sarcasm, in case it wasnât obvious)
s_roberts99 about 12 years ago
Oh! Jimmy, jimmy, jimmy, Jimmy!
nanczarny about 12 years ago
Janis? Where are you?
Q4horse about 12 years ago
Arenât all modern cartoons computer animations now?
Kvasir42 Premium Member about 12 years ago
Sadly newspaper cartoons/comics met their match when the size kept shrinking (leading to Bill Wattersonâs many fights over size and his ultimate departure).
doublepaw about 12 years ago
Should have saved that trick for a Sunday strip.
Rotary12 Premium Member about 12 years ago
Nice. Very clever shortcuts.
coz69 about 12 years ago
Clutch CargoâŠ
mhlon Premium Member about 12 years ago
hmm, a little history is order here. With the advent of TV, stations needed filler and cartoons made for Movie Theaters fit the bill exactly. Just remember that those cartoons (Warner Bros, etc) were NOT made for children, but the stations plugged them in especially when children were watching. Thus a whole generation grew up on Road Runner and Tom and Jerry etc. (Disney kept their own to themselves on the Mickey Mouse Club). ButâŠ.some industry people realized that making cartoons that way for TV would be outrageously expensive (way to many cels to color), but didnât know what to do. Enter âCrusader Rabbitâ, the first animated cartoon made for TV which used the revolving background and really cut the number of cels to a minimum. And who were some of the illustrators working on Crusader? Hanna and Barbera, and with the advent of Quick Draw McGraw (and others) the rest is â sadly â history. I know, I watched Crusader in 1951-1952 when I was 4-5. It wasnât Mighty Mouse, but it was animation. What IS sad is the dumbing down of todayâs cartoons. Generations are growing up with insipid and trite presentations instead of very layered and textured cartoons with lots of subtle adult themes.
Sidneypop about 12 years ago
Iâve heard that kids prefer the old hand drawn cartoons over the computer generated ones.
morningglory73 Premium Member about 12 years ago
This comic strip today is so true. The cartoons I watched growing up are so superior to today excluding some animated movies of course. Those have improved greatly.
hippogriff about 12 years ago
I wonder how many people were introduced to classical music by watching Chuck Jones cartoons.
burleigh2 about 12 years ago
Attacking yourself as if you donât notice is a cute joke. ;-)
racerxyz about 12 years ago
I looked again a few times, and this is correct. Looks like definitely an optical illusion. Compare each of the panel backgrounds separately to the white GoComics background instead of comparing them to each other. They are not different shades after all. Good call!
Notgiven about 12 years ago
JJâs blog:âIt also was a gentle poke at a lot of comic-strip artists out there, particularly those who produce exclusively with digitial tools. You see a lot of it these days, identical panels except for the lettering and a few cosmetic tweaks from panel to panelâŠ.However, at Arlo & Janis we make cartoons the old-fashioned way. We grind them out with pen and ink.â
jerrythemacguy about 12 years ago
Cheap, limited animation on TV in the 60s and 70s was derided as âAnimated Radioâ. Lots of dialog, little action.
leighann1960 about 12 years ago
Ha ha
Dragon0131 about 12 years ago
Whatâs interesting are the Tom & Jerry cartoons. When they moved production to Czechoslovakia, the animation and sound effects were so appalling that they moved it back to the states.When my kids (20 & 18 now) were little, we would watch the old animation from Disney, Hanna-Barbera and Warner. They enjoyed the old animation, the classical music and, believe it or not, having to think to get the joke. I never realized how fortunate I was to be exposed to the old classics until I realized how bad animation was getting and the fact that adults felt children werenât worth the effort.
ursen1 about 12 years ago
@coz69 Clutch Cargo was my first thought as the absolute nadir of good cartooning. I watched an old episode a while back, and it was completely painful to watch.
Nora Martinez Premium Member about 12 years ago
Ahhh ⊠the irony! Love it! :)
tcar-1 about 12 years ago
Those old Warner Bros Merry-Melodies and Looney-Tunes, the old Popeye cartoons and Disneyâs movies like Dumbo etc. You canât beat those. Not just the artwork but the sneaky humour that was never intended for kids! These new things on Cartoon Network are awful!
paul brians about 12 years ago
Fun to see Johnson making fun of himself.
Good animation comes and goes. Look at old Felix or Betty Boop cartoons and note all the repeated motions. Iâve been watching a disc full of Winsor McKay animations, which are amazingly sophisticated, but also make use of the shortcut of repeating frame sequences over and over.
For recent animation, see Tangled. Or contrast The Simpsons with South Park.
Gokie5 about 12 years ago
One of my pet peeves is the way that characters in Dreamworks, I believe it is, register astonishment and what- have-you. Always, always the same. According to my daughter, someone used motion-capture technology on an actor responding to something, and the same response has been used in perpetuity. If that isnât so, it certainly seems like it. Almost as bad is the way that animated characters seem to glide along as they walk. Canât someone program a computer to show something like a weighted person making an impression on what he/she waks on? @Dragon0131 said, âI never realized how fortunate I was to be exposed to the old classics until I realized how bad animation was getting and the fact that adults felt children werenât worth the effort.â I imagine that itâs that adults feel that children arenât worth the cost. Quality requires $$$.
iced tea about 12 years ago
Youâve seen how Alley Oop and Nancy turned out.
KasperV about 12 years ago
Ha-ha! Itâs true â you Americans just donât do irony! (apart from JJ, who does it VERY well)
174grove about 12 years ago
Crusader Rabbit one of my favoritesâŠshowing my age.
lynnskay about 12 years ago
You get 4 pages? We are lucky to have one whole page!
AdamJBlack about 12 years ago
This is one of the best!
K M about 12 years ago
Taking a page from the Garry Trudeau book, eh, JJ? I recall seeing a parody that actually did use the same panel over and over and over ⊠sorta like this strip.
lmchildress about 12 years ago
Doonesbury did it deliberately, in homage to Jules Feiffer, who started it. BUT, they drew every panel. As for repeating backgrounds in animation, how about TV shows. Watch the credit roll on Taxi. Same strip repeated over and over.
lmchildress about 12 years ago
Plus Charles Schulz did something similar in an early Peanuts cartoon, where he had Charlie Brown speaking paragraphs in each square, to make a point about strips that had too much dialogue.
hippogriff about 12 years ago
whmIII: I vaguely recall eight pages on Sundays, five daily. Now the Dalla Snooze runs six on Sundays and two and a half daily.
sallyseckman about 12 years ago
It is because of the passion these cartoon creators put into these works!
Walkdad2 Premium Member about 12 years ago
Clutch Cargo was the best at limited animation