Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for September 15, 2013
September 14, 2013
September 16, 2013
Transcript:
Kate: ! To leap or not to leap... ...That's not even a question!
Danae: Ya know, it's easier to just watch the movie version, Kate.
Kate: What fun is that?
Literacy, Literacy⊠Wherefore art thou oh Literacy� Going, going soon to be gone by way of social media.Alas Literacy I knew you well I wish I had known you better.
plus, movies edit out a lot of stuff from books and real life. watch new world, and then read christopher columbus bio. columbus was not a really a good guy. watch pocahontas and read about her. she was bald, 14, and prancing naked in the market square.
Books are much more satisfying than moviesâŠ..And in a book you know what the characters are thinking, what motivates themâŠUnless itâs narrated, a movie doesnât do thatâŠ
I put off reading A Tale of Two Cities for years, figuring if it was a book that was required reading in high school, it was pretty bad. (our class had to read Moby Dick, Lord Jim, etc.) but after I ran out of the other Charles Dickens novels at the library, I finally read it, and it was one of the best books I ever read!!! (And Iâve read thousands)
Scarlett OâHara was not beautifulâŠ.. Call me IshmaelâŠ.Prince Raoden of Arelon awoke early one morning, completely unaware the he had been damned for all timeâŠ. There once was a boy named Eustance Clarence Scrubb, and he almost deserved itâŠMarley was deadâŠ. etc.
To make a movie out of a novel, first, boil it down into a short story, and pluck out some of the other background to pass on to the set designers and costumers, maybe special effects. The flavor is just never going to be the same.
We donât need more bookcases; No, we need more WALLS!
Samuel Clemens wrote, concerning The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn:
âPersons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted; persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished; persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.â
This suggests that authors and reviewers do not inhabit a common plane of reality.
Speaking of Dickens, I just finished rereading The Mystery Of Edwin Drood, his unfinished final novel. Amazing how a mystery thriller with all the proper components of the time it was written could be so funny! Enjoyed it immensely.
You remind me of an anecdote about another adaptation: while she was writing her Oscar-winning screenplay for Sense and Sensibility, Emma Thompson heard from a fan who was very eager to see how she handled her favorite character. Thompson says she didnât have the heart to tell her that sheâd completely cut that character from the movie.
The movies made from older works arenât as good as the books because the books are the cream of their eras, the âclassics.â All the dreck from those times has been discarded.However, the movies made from modern works, e.g. Devil Wears Prada or Julie & Julia, are often much better than the books because they improve on books that would never stand the test of time.
Aw, gawdbless them âhollywood screen-writersâ and their teen-view on Great Works. Hard to work in a car-chase and crash+explosions into a Classic, but somehow they manage to mangle it for the slack-jawed masses.
The one blessing of modern technology is that the world of literature is right at your finger tips on your Reader or Tablet or iPod or even on your laptop. I live in an area where books written in English are scarce and expensive. The joy of going to my Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 and downloading ( mostly for free ) any book I choose, is like carrying the public library with me. It is an opportunity to reread those authors like Melville, Dumas, and Twain that I loved as a kid but didnât have the adult perspective to really appreciate their style.And it is also an opportunity to read new authors, who ordinarily wouldnât have necessarily have found an audience.
Linguist, that is very true about most things we read and saw at the movies when we were children. I havenât gone back to many of the classics I was forced to read(the 200 year old English being hard to translate), but watching some of the classic movies on the movie channels have given me a lot more perspective about how my parents and grandparents thought.
1. Some movies are better than the books theyâre based on â cf.The Wizard of Oz.2. I can remember reading the end of A Tale of Two Cities in 12th-grade English and sniveling to myself.3.Fried Green Tomatoes was a good movie and captured the spirit of the book. I read the book later, and was glad I did. It had several interesting and informative subplots. I can remember Naughty Bird Peavy leaning into her mirror as she put on makeup to conquer the world, after learning that her faithless boyfriend had been killed by a toy truck (or something) thrown by his toddler. She rose from her deathbed and resumed life.
Make a post â on a comic â only to denigrate and recruit sentiment against someone with whom you donât agree?âŠhow cynically ironic of you â based on your history of commentary on gocomics !
Glad to see you weighing in on this subject. I love reading. Almost anything. I even like âpulp fictionâ, âspace operasâ and some of the Western writers. Dickens was fabulous and his descriptive powers were superb. One could SEE the landscape of his time, down to the clothes the characters wore. My only regret is that English is my only language. Iâve read many translations but there are some Spanish and other writers that you can see the rhythm is bumpy in translation. Books have given me a peculiar perspective on life and the world. Reading has fed my empathy, I cannot feel apathetic. It has fed my outrage at times and mostly been my best friend. I feel sorry for our children and their children. They are hard put to think critically and their apathy is showing. Iâll quit rambling, but I guess I just wanted to say READ A BOOK, itâll do you good. Not you singly, Linguist, but everyone.
Habogee: De gustibus⊠I found it to be the only book that was considerably improved in the movie. Most are ruined. Some of essentially independent. To Have and to Have Not does not have the Bacall character in Hemingwayâs book, and the screenplay was by William Faulkner.
This charming little comic evoked 83 comments â no comment on quality or lack of. Point here: Even reading ABOUT reading stimulated thought. THATâs the point.
Biggest part of our recent move was my 1,400 book library! My Kindle only has 135 on it, but is much easier to move!! BTW, movies arenât necessarily bad, but scientific references, medical books, etc, donât work as movies! Nor do engineering, physics, and mathemetics.
Iâve been a reader all my life (cut my reading teeth on Dr. Seuss; thank you Mom and Dad). I enjoy both books and movies. They are different media and are made by different people (regardless of the âbased on the novel by . . . â credit), so yes, they are going to be different. I always thought the movie The Godfather was choppy and not very well done, probably because I had already read the book. It had very detailed omniscient narration that was impossible to squeeze into a movie script. Then thereâs Planet of the Apes â the movie took almost nothing from the book except the title, but I loved both. So it goes.
Anybody fond of old editions of books? My best recent reading experience was the following: I found a copy of Gone With the Wind, printed in 1936, at a rummage sale. When I sat down to read it, I found myself savoring the feel of the book and the paper and thinking about what the world was like when the book was printed. It was a fascinating experience to slip out of the 21st century into the pre-WWII era the book came from. I could block out the phones and the TVs and the computers and just imagine sitting down to read the book in 1936. It made it all the more fun to jump into the book (just like Kate!) and go back to 1861. Nothing wrong with new editions of books, or reading them on Kindles and so on; itâs just another way to keep them alive. But thereâs something special about old editions like that one.
Been reading Bernard Cornwellâs Sharpes series. Then got the DVDâs from the library. While Sean Bean is great in the series, canât match the books.Good stuff!
Read âBleak Houseâ about 2 years ago, and decided it was one of the best books I ever read. Nothing bleak about it. The last third of the book (a big book, mind you) got read during an all-nighter on a Sunday night â by 10am the next day (still reading), realized I wouldnât be going into work that day, because there was no way I was going to stop reading until I got to the end. Read âOur Mutual Friendâ earlier this year, and am reading âLittle Dorritâ right now. Reading Dickens requires being a little patient toward the beginning while you spend time on the side with minor characters (Bagnets, Buckets, Boffins, Jo, Guppy, John Chivery, Jenny Wren, Miss Flite, even Pancks) who always end up being very interesting), but there is a huge payoff if you stick with it.
Caddy57 over 11 years ago
Katie the Anti Danae!
Can't Sleep over 11 years ago
Wiley, insert my applause here.
watmiwori over 11 years ago
Thatâs about the LAST thing Danae needs!
wrwallaceii over 11 years ago
Literacy, Literacy⊠Wherefore art thou oh Literacy� Going, going soon to be gone by way of social media.Alas Literacy I knew you well I wish I had known you better.
attyush over 11 years ago
Iâm a member of the illiterate book club. We meet once a week to judge a book by its cover.
LeslieBark over 11 years ago
Katie and I are bookaholics and proud of it!
Kvasir42 Premium Member over 11 years ago
The best opening and closing of any book published (and the middle ainât bad, either).
mischugenah over 11 years ago
Iâm not so fond of Dickens, myself. The man was paid by the word, and it shows!
vwdualnomand over 11 years ago
plus, movies edit out a lot of stuff from books and real life. watch new world, and then read christopher columbus bio. columbus was not a really a good guy. watch pocahontas and read about her. she was bald, 14, and prancing naked in the market square.
Varnes over 11 years ago
Books are much more satisfying than moviesâŠ..And in a book you know what the characters are thinking, what motivates themâŠUnless itâs narrated, a movie doesnât do thatâŠ
jreckard over 11 years ago
It is a far, far better thing that I read, than I have ever rented.
jollyroger53 over 11 years ago
I put off reading A Tale of Two Cities for years, figuring if it was a book that was required reading in high school, it was pretty bad. (our class had to read Moby Dick, Lord Jim, etc.) but after I ran out of the other Charles Dickens novels at the library, I finally read it, and it was one of the best books I ever read!!! (And Iâve read thousands)
KatharinFoster over 11 years ago
Thanks for capturing the sheer joy of reading!
Katharin Foster
jollyroger53 over 11 years ago
Scarlett OâHara was not beautifulâŠ.. Call me IshmaelâŠ.Prince Raoden of Arelon awoke early one morning, completely unaware the he had been damned for all timeâŠ. There once was a boy named Eustance Clarence Scrubb, and he almost deserved itâŠMarley was deadâŠ. etc.
jollyroger53 over 11 years ago
I put off reading A Tale of Two Cities for years and when I finally did, it was one of the best books I ever read.
pbarnrob over 11 years ago
I often prefer the book; the pictures are better.
To make a movie out of a novel, first, boil it down into a short story, and pluck out some of the other background to pass on to the set designers and costumers, maybe special effects. The flavor is just never going to be the same.
We donât need more bookcases; No, we need more WALLS!
pbarnrob over 11 years ago
Support your local library; itâs Banned Book Month.
Read a banned book today!
Miserichord over 11 years ago
Samuel Clemens wrote, concerning The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn:
âPersons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted; persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished; persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.â
This suggests that authors and reviewers do not inhabit a common plane of reality.
greenearthman over 11 years ago
Wow!! You go Kate!
puddlesplatt over 11 years ago
Iâv never read a book by Cover?
CaptainKiddeo over 11 years ago
Speaking of Dickens, I just finished rereading The Mystery Of Edwin Drood, his unfinished final novel. Amazing how a mystery thriller with all the proper components of the time it was written could be so funny! Enjoyed it immensely.
sbchamp over 11 years ago
Melville and Hubbard too
sbchamp over 11 years ago
My favorite toast
CaptainKiddeo over 11 years ago
You remind me of an anecdote about another adaptation: while she was writing her Oscar-winning screenplay for Sense and Sensibility, Emma Thompson heard from a fan who was very eager to see how she handled her favorite character. Thompson says she didnât have the heart to tell her that sheâd completely cut that character from the movie.
dabugger over 11 years ago
The Dickens is it? Kate really has itâŠ..Will Danae find it?âŠ.
Mickeylacey over 11 years ago
Never got through the tale of two cities but this inspired me to try again!!!!
Habogee over 11 years ago
The African Queen is my favorite movie. Partially because it was so faithful to the book.
caseyman over 11 years ago
The movies made from older works arenât as good as the books because the books are the cream of their eras, the âclassics.â All the dreck from those times has been discarded.However, the movies made from modern works, e.g. Devil Wears Prada or Julie & Julia, are often much better than the books because they improve on books that would never stand the test of time.
jahoody over 11 years ago
I only know the old B&W classicsâŠ.would much rather read since most of todayâs offerings are b o r i n g when it comes to story content.
brulemonster over 11 years ago
How does that matter?
unca jim over 11 years ago
Aw, gawdbless them âhollywood screen-writersâ and their teen-view on Great Works. Hard to work in a car-chase and crash+explosions into a Classic, but somehow they manage to mangle it for the slack-jawed masses.
Just sayinââŠâŠ..
Linguist over 11 years ago
The one blessing of modern technology is that the world of literature is right at your finger tips on your Reader or Tablet or iPod or even on your laptop. I live in an area where books written in English are scarce and expensive. The joy of going to my Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 and downloading ( mostly for free ) any book I choose, is like carrying the public library with me. It is an opportunity to reread those authors like Melville, Dumas, and Twain that I loved as a kid but didnât have the adult perspective to really appreciate their style.And it is also an opportunity to read new authors, who ordinarily wouldnât have necessarily have found an audience.
The Life I Draw Upon over 11 years ago
As great as the 20,000 Leagues Under the Seas Disney film was, it did not match Jules Verneâs book.
route66paul over 11 years ago
Linguist, that is very true about most things we read and saw at the movies when we were children. I havenât gone back to many of the classics I was forced to read(the 200 year old English being hard to translate), but watching some of the classic movies on the movie channels have given me a lot more perspective about how my parents and grandparents thought.
OldHeathen over 11 years ago
âNever trust anyone who has not brought a book with them.â â Lemony Snicket
Not the Smartest Man On the Planet -- Maybe Close Premium Member over 11 years ago
This strip should spend more time on Kate. Danaeâs constant naysaying is becoming tiresome.
Jessica_D over 11 years ago
Alexikakos & dukedoug
Thanks for the smile today, both of you :0)
dzw3030 over 11 years ago
âSo many books, so little time.â [some smart person, somewhere, said that.]
Gokie5 over 11 years ago
âNow now, Danae.. Reading shall stimulate your imagination..âHer imagination needs stimulating?
Gokie5 over 11 years ago
1. Some movies are better than the books theyâre based on â cf.The Wizard of Oz.2. I can remember reading the end of A Tale of Two Cities in 12th-grade English and sniveling to myself.3.Fried Green Tomatoes was a good movie and captured the spirit of the book. I read the book later, and was glad I did. It had several interesting and informative subplots. I can remember Naughty Bird Peavy leaning into her mirror as she put on makeup to conquer the world, after learning that her faithless boyfriend had been killed by a toy truck (or something) thrown by his toddler. She rose from her deathbed and resumed life.
Robert C. Premium Member over 11 years ago
Make a post â on a comic â only to denigrate and recruit sentiment against someone with whom you donât agree?âŠhow cynically ironic of you â based on your history of commentary on gocomics !
markjoseph125 over 11 years ago
Great comic. Thanks, Wiley!
pawpawbear over 11 years ago
Glad to see you weighing in on this subject. I love reading. Almost anything. I even like âpulp fictionâ, âspace operasâ and some of the Western writers. Dickens was fabulous and his descriptive powers were superb. One could SEE the landscape of his time, down to the clothes the characters wore. My only regret is that English is my only language. Iâve read many translations but there are some Spanish and other writers that you can see the rhythm is bumpy in translation. Books have given me a peculiar perspective on life and the world. Reading has fed my empathy, I cannot feel apathetic. It has fed my outrage at times and mostly been my best friend. I feel sorry for our children and their children. They are hard put to think critically and their apathy is showing. Iâll quit rambling, but I guess I just wanted to say READ A BOOK, itâll do you good. Not you singly, Linguist, but everyone.
hippogriff over 11 years ago
Habogee: De gustibus⊠I found it to be the only book that was considerably improved in the movie. Most are ruined. Some of essentially independent. To Have and to Have Not does not have the Bacall character in Hemingwayâs book, and the screenplay was by William Faulkner.
dogday Premium Member over 11 years ago
This charming little comic evoked 83 comments â no comment on quality or lack of. Point here: Even reading ABOUT reading stimulated thought. THATâs the point.
JLG Premium Member over 11 years ago
Katie is so cute.
Dtroutma over 11 years ago
Biggest part of our recent move was my 1,400 book library! My Kindle only has 135 on it, but is much easier to move!! BTW, movies arenât necessarily bad, but scientific references, medical books, etc, donât work as movies! Nor do engineering, physics, and mathemetics.
neatslob Premium Member over 11 years ago
I think he got paid by the comma. Iâve never seen anyone else use so many.
paullp Premium Member over 11 years ago
Go, Kate!!
Iâve been a reader all my life (cut my reading teeth on Dr. Seuss; thank you Mom and Dad). I enjoy both books and movies. They are different media and are made by different people (regardless of the âbased on the novel by . . . â credit), so yes, they are going to be different. I always thought the movie The Godfather was choppy and not very well done, probably because I had already read the book. It had very detailed omniscient narration that was impossible to squeeze into a movie script. Then thereâs Planet of the Apes â the movie took almost nothing from the book except the title, but I loved both. So it goes.
Anybody fond of old editions of books? My best recent reading experience was the following: I found a copy of Gone With the Wind, printed in 1936, at a rummage sale. When I sat down to read it, I found myself savoring the feel of the book and the paper and thinking about what the world was like when the book was printed. It was a fascinating experience to slip out of the 21st century into the pre-WWII era the book came from. I could block out the phones and the TVs and the computers and just imagine sitting down to read the book in 1936. It made it all the more fun to jump into the book (just like Kate!) and go back to 1861. Nothing wrong with new editions of books, or reading them on Kindles and so on; itâs just another way to keep them alive. But thereâs something special about old editions like that one.
twj0729 over 11 years ago
Been reading Bernard Cornwellâs Sharpes series. Then got the DVDâs from the library. While Sean Bean is great in the series, canât match the books.Good stuff!
NightOwl19 over 11 years ago
Read âBleak Houseâ about 2 years ago, and decided it was one of the best books I ever read. Nothing bleak about it. The last third of the book (a big book, mind you) got read during an all-nighter on a Sunday night â by 10am the next day (still reading), realized I wouldnât be going into work that day, because there was no way I was going to stop reading until I got to the end. Read âOur Mutual Friendâ earlier this year, and am reading âLittle Dorritâ right now. Reading Dickens requires being a little patient toward the beginning while you spend time on the side with minor characters (Bagnets, Buckets, Boffins, Jo, Guppy, John Chivery, Jenny Wren, Miss Flite, even Pancks) who always end up being very interesting), but there is a huge payoff if you stick with it.