ANandy responds: “Ken, in addition to being a notorious liar, you are incredibly dense.”
In other words, ANandy doesn’t know the answer to your question, Ken, but doesn’t have the integrity to admit it.
So instead she does her usual, lashing out with childish insults in a vain attempt to distract. You’d think by now she’d have learned that people see right through it.
In another of her usual ad hominem attacks, ANandy responds: “Either Anthony hasn’t been paying attention or is as dense as Warren.
They’re all the same, the GOP being the minority.
Most of the last Century has been a steady progression toward a Fascist (Neo-Socalist) economy, my mantra the nearly two years I’ve been involved here.”
Oh, I’ve been paying attention, ANandy, which is why I know you have no substance.
In another of her usual ad hominem attacks, ANandy responds: “Now we’ve established who holds himself in such high esteem, and it’s taken you nearly two years to arrive at your conclusion.
Good luck with that. Since you’ve been paying attention, dense is all that is left. ”
Two years? I’ve been pointing out the worthlessness of your posts well before today, ANandy.
And you obviously agree, which is why you keep deleting them.
In 2008 Goldman Sachs contributed $994,795 to the Barack Obama campaign.
That was more than they contributed to the GOP. It would appear they got back a better deal from Obama than they would have gotten from the GOP. Just why do you think they spent so much?
ANandy inexplicably responds: Anthony, how dense can you be, to be caught in a lie on the same page. What comment was directed at you when you butted in?”
It was when you said, “Yet you keep coming back. mmm?” Like, maybe all of three posts ago?
It’s right there, just a couple of posts before you called me a liar for saying you “post comments directed at me”.
Are you now going to claim “Yet you keep coming back. mmm?” wasn’t directed at me? Sure looks like it was.
Speaking of butting in, my first comment on this thread was directed not at you, but to Ken. You know, I commented to him about one of your many purely ad hominem attack posts that you later decided would be better to delete (but I unfortunately quoted before you did),
ANandy responds: “I feel character traits are fair game for comment.”
Like your lack of integrity, inability to admit when you are wrong, and calling people liars when the evidence is plain to see that it is you who are lying.
You know what? Speaking of character traits, you post like you’re an alcoholic (or have some other affliction that causes your judgment to sway all over the place). It seems when drunk (or whatever), you’ll make posts consisting of nothing but mindless, baseless insults, and then come back later in a more rational frame of mind and delete what you wrote.
And with the denial typical of that, you’re unable to admit what you’ve done.
ANandy responds: “Or, perhaps seeing the fools talking to themselves gives one satisfaction. How do you rationalize your behavior? You see yourself as the arbiter of what is permissible on these pages?”
In your case, just calling you on your BS.
Even though I’m sure you’d rather it just sat out there, unchallenged.
charliekane almost 14 years ago
Mafia kinda thing?
Motivemagus almost 14 years ago
2009 net profits: $12.192 billion. ANandy is right.
Dtroutma almost 14 years ago
Yes, ANandy, we agree, and just a tiny trim at that!
kennethcwarren64 almost 14 years ago
ANDY - How deep would the cut be if the GOP was doing it?
Jaedabee Premium Member almost 14 years ago
I hate to say it but let’s be thankful it IS something.
kennethcwarren64 almost 14 years ago
RADISH - All too true, I know some of those people.
Jade is right it is very little, but it is something – but, if the GOP wins in November, they will bandage the “wound!”
myming almost 14 years ago
what’s mr. sec holding in his right hand ?
where’s bruce ?
Jaedabee Premium Member almost 14 years ago
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jul/20/goldmansachs-lloyd-blankfein
Goldman Sachs gets fined and “suddenly” their profit margin drops, though their bonus pool remains relatively the same. Go go power Free Market… .
riley05 almost 14 years ago
ANandy responds: “Ken, in addition to being a notorious liar, you are incredibly dense.”
In other words, ANandy doesn’t know the answer to your question, Ken, but doesn’t have the integrity to admit it.
So instead she does her usual, lashing out with childish insults in a vain attempt to distract. You’d think by now she’d have learned that people see right through it.
riley05 almost 14 years ago
Myming, I think the right hand is just a glove, as drawn by Davies…not holding anything.
riley05 almost 14 years ago
In another of her usual ad hominem attacks, ANandy responds: “Either Anthony hasn’t been paying attention or is as dense as Warren. They’re all the same, the GOP being the minority. Most of the last Century has been a steady progression toward a Fascist (Neo-Socalist) economy, my mantra the nearly two years I’ve been involved here.”
Oh, I’ve been paying attention, ANandy, which is why I know you have no substance.
Nothing but “Bozotus”-quality childish insults.
VERY impressive…and telling.
riley05 almost 14 years ago
In another of her usual ad hominem attacks, ANandy responds: “Now we’ve established who holds himself in such high esteem, and it’s taken you nearly two years to arrive at your conclusion. Good luck with that. Since you’ve been paying attention, dense is all that is left. ”
Two years? I’ve been pointing out the worthlessness of your posts well before today, ANandy.
And you obviously agree, which is why you keep deleting them.
Libertarian1 almost 14 years ago
In 2008 Goldman Sachs contributed $994,795 to the Barack Obama campaign.
That was more than they contributed to the GOP. It would appear they got back a better deal from Obama than they would have gotten from the GOP. Just why do you think they spent so much?
riley05 almost 14 years ago
Because it was obvious that after the Bush disaster, Obama was going to win, so they decided to throw their lot in with him.
Libertarian1 almost 14 years ago
^ That was their best investment ever. A return of 100-1.
charliekane almost 14 years ago
More like a loss of 550 to 1,eh?
riley05 almost 14 years ago
Ask the Goldman Sachs execs how much they lost, Charlie.
Unless you define “loss” as meaning “maybe not so much winning in the future”, I don’t think they lost much.
Unlike their clients, they lost nothing.
riley05 almost 14 years ago
ANandy replies: “Well before today. That’s news to all here, yet you keep coming back for more. How better can one define dense?”
Ah, trying to get you to do more than mindless ad hominem “bozotus” posts?
Trying to get you to actually provide substance?
Yeah, you got me. That is pretty “dense” of me.
riley05 almost 14 years ago
ANandy Replies: “We are in agreement.”
That’s kind of sad that you agree your posts have no substance…just mindless childish insults.
But it does explain why you post more than a dozen times a day, yet have only around 400 undeleted posts since 2008.
If my posts were as worthless and embarrassing as yours, I’d delete them, too.
Actually, I’d never have posted them in the first place.
riley05 almost 14 years ago
ANandy Replies: “Yet you keep coming back. mmm?”
Oh, I’m sorry…when you post comments directed at me, you don’t want me to respond?
I can understand how that could be upsetting to you.
riley05 almost 14 years ago
ANandy inexplicably responds: Anthony, how dense can you be, to be caught in a lie on the same page. What comment was directed at you when you butted in?”
It was when you said, “Yet you keep coming back. mmm?” Like, maybe all of three posts ago?
It’s right there, just a couple of posts before you called me a liar for saying you “post comments directed at me”.
Are you now going to claim “Yet you keep coming back. mmm?” wasn’t directed at me? Sure looks like it was.
Speaking of butting in, my first comment on this thread was directed not at you, but to Ken. You know, I commented to him about one of your many purely ad hominem attack posts that you later decided would be better to delete (but I unfortunately quoted before you did),
riley05 almost 14 years ago
ANandy responds: “I feel character traits are fair game for comment.”
Like your lack of integrity, inability to admit when you are wrong, and calling people liars when the evidence is plain to see that it is you who are lying.
You know what? Speaking of character traits, you post like you’re an alcoholic (or have some other affliction that causes your judgment to sway all over the place). It seems when drunk (or whatever), you’ll make posts consisting of nothing but mindless, baseless insults, and then come back later in a more rational frame of mind and delete what you wrote.
And with the denial typical of that, you’re unable to admit what you’ve done.
riley05 almost 14 years ago
ANandy responds: “Or, perhaps seeing the fools talking to themselves gives one satisfaction. How do you rationalize your behavior? You see yourself as the arbiter of what is permissible on these pages?”
In your case, just calling you on your BS.
Even though I’m sure you’d rather it just sat out there, unchallenged.