Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for October 12, 2010

  1. Stewiebrian
    pouncingtiger  about 14 years ago

    Eddie the scholah

     •  Reply
  2. Thinker
    Sisyphos  about 14 years ago

    Sounds good to me. Not sure what it means, though….

     •  Reply
  3. Phonepic3altered4
    yyyguy  about 14 years ago

    very erudite, Cap’n Eddie! but you ain’t talking to Princeton graduates. know your audience.

     •  Reply
  4. Maine coon
    harrietbe  about 14 years ago

    At least we know that the Anti-Christ isn’t Danae.

     •  Reply
  5. Maine coon
    harrietbe  about 14 years ago

    Hate the Doonsbury faces around the strip. How distracting!

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    colt380  about 14 years ago

    DOH……

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    al5304  about 14 years ago

    harrietbe has it right, dumdsbury faces are sickening.

     •  Reply
  8. Owls 96
    gjsjr41  about 14 years ago

    What Doonesbury faces? I don’t see any.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    okvol  about 14 years ago

    Back to the toon,

    Could Flo be the anti-ekert? Nothing anyone else does ever shakes her up. Is Eddie’s use of the male pronoun a misdirection?

     •  Reply
  10. Grog poop
    GROG Premium Member about 14 years ago

    It just would make any sense without those 3 words.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Aryalover  about 14 years ago

    I agree, harrietbe; but then I can’t stand Doonesbury anyway.

     •  Reply
  12. Ngc891 rs 580x527
    alan.gurka  about 14 years ago

    Eddie the Bloviator! Yeah, what’s with the Doonesbury characters? Why not integrate it with other cartoon characters as well, or leave well enough alone and leave them all off.

     •  Reply
  13. Grog poop
    GROG Premium Member about 14 years ago

    I never liked Doonesbury.

     •  Reply
  14. What has been seen t1
    lewisbower  about 14 years ago

    OKVOL I thought complaining about “HE” being sex exclusive and applying to all men and women went out with Gloria and Betty?

    He- used in a generic sense or when the sex of the person is unspecified.

    Hate to say it, “Man” has non-sexist meaning

    “Person” (as in Chairperson) might be construed to mean “for each MALE offspring” Hmmm? Shake up a libber?

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    dtut  about 14 years ago

    I suggested from the first mention of an anti-eckert that I thought it was Eddie himself. So far, I see nothing to disprove that.

    As for the Doonesbury faces, this is the GoComics web site, not the Nonsequitur web site. You can see where the Nonsequitur “real estate” on the page begins and ends. Apparently GoComics creates a common border for all the strips. Today (and maybe the week, the month, or the year) it is a Doonesbury theme.

     •  Reply
  16. 104 2745
    Trebor39  about 14 years ago

    So where is this Anti-Ekert?

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    jsprat  about 14 years ago

    Ah, the visibility of the Doonsbury background is based on your monitor resolution setting.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    barbfrost  about 14 years ago

    I thought the Anti-Eckert works for Goldman.-Sachs.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    kleybas  about 14 years ago

    How about……. Cap’n Eddie’s cat is the anti-Ekert?

     •  Reply
  20. Hawaii5 0girl
    treered  about 14 years ago

    but flagging feels so good! Back to the comic; is Captain Eddie’s use of those words a Freudian slip? is he REALLY who we think he is?! BWAH HA HA HA HA….

     •  Reply
  21. Cat7
    rockngolfer  about 14 years ago

    Now that is funny. I didn’t see the Doonesbury characters the first time because I concentrated on the middle of the screen.

     •  Reply
  22. Pogomarch
    MatureCanadian  about 14 years ago

    “vacuous ambivilance”; sounds like a Bush to me. Or could it be one of the “old” V.P.’s like Dan Quale?

    My pop-up blocker blocks any weird excess content so the Doonesbury border isn’t GoComics. Try reducing that new Meebo stuff on the bottom.

     •  Reply
  23. Yellow pig small
    bmonk  about 14 years ago

    The anti-ekert reminds me of the survey that asked whether ignorance or apathy is a greater danger to progress.

    The most popular answer: We don’t know, and we don’t care.

    The survey never went anywhere after that.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    NightOwl19  about 14 years ago

    BTW I think Doonesbury is great - I love some of the individual story lines! (Sorry to post an irrelevant comment - I just wanted to be Ekert-like and bring the average opinion of Doonesbury on today’s comment board back to zero.) (Preferably without gaining weight.)

     •  Reply
  25. Wizard 2
    MobyD  about 14 years ago

    The reason for the Doonesbury stuff is it’s the strip’s 40th anniversary.

    You’d think the cat would give Eddie a strange look at those big words, but she appears to be napping.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    Aryalover  about 14 years ago

    Flagging DOES work arvelru. See post from jglynn from GoComics under today’s Argyle Sweater. Are you shilling for the spammers, trying to get us not to flag? Spammer re-posted later in the day. Flagged him again.

     •  Reply
  27. Cathy aack
    lindz.coop Premium Member about 14 years ago

    Good one TimeWeaver – I like Doons & don’t see any characters either.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur