Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
âŠwhich reminds meâŠdoesnât this republican/Rush/Fox news âLies /One Nation Under Godâ shouting remind you of the Salem Witch Hunt.Burn um at the stake whether theyâre guilty or not âcuz we just feel like burninâ somethinâ.Wait,that reminds me of the KKKâŠnever mind,I get where theyâre coming from,nowâŠ
GT is now 61 years-old. I suspect the creative juices are now beginning to flow a little less forcefully than they use to. I suppose if Charles Shultz can republish his cartoon strip (which became increasingly more redundant as the years wore on) from beyond the grave, Trudeau can take an occasional break.
3hourtour, I wasnât there at Salem (did CNN cover that?), but in both instances, people were afraid of insideous evil dark forces that they had reason to believe were trying to take over their lives and those of their children.
Socialism, witchcraft, whatâs the difference? Nancy Pelosi makes a great spokesmodel for both.
Joe Allen, I wish I didnât have to contribute to Social Security or Medicare⊠if I had my own and my employers contributions to invest myself, I would do much, much better than the ponzi schemes created by these manatory social programs, all of which are expected to go broke without major interventions.
Donât even you left-wing loons wish you could withdraw the money that you and your employers invested in these programs and make real decisions that would ensure you and your families futures? Wouldnât it be great if you could leave these earnings to your family?
Socialism is about not being able to make crucial decisions about what you have earned through your hard work for the âcommon goodâ. Itâs a sacrifice enforced by the governmentâs gun. Why want more of it?
Joe Allen wrote: â Why do you radical right-wing Republicans confuse social programs with socialism? â
LOL
Probably because they have 6 letters in common. Which is why they have done away with ice cream socials at the churches.
Also, it is the nastiest word they can come up with to interject in a sensible discussion on issues of national import.
Nemi wrote: â Socialism is about not being able to make crucial decisions about what you have earned through your hard work for the âcommon goodâ. â
Socialism is what FLAMING ILLITERATES call the necessity of government involvement in aspects of the economy for which their exists no competition and for which free market forces simply cannot work.
âSocialismâ isnât meant to be pejorative⊠it simply is what it is, so thereâs no need to get defensive about it when it comes up in conversation. I have no problem with the concept of socailism when it works, as it does for public safety and transportation. I do have a problem with it when it is used to allow the government make choices that free persons should be making for themselves.
Having choices is what it means to be free. Having choices taken away is the foundation of tyranny, no matter who takes them away, why they are taken away, or how benevolent the motives⊠and governments very seldom have benevolent motives.
My memory of the late Sixties and early Seventies was that the Liberals of the day were ardently pushing to release mentally ill people out onto the street. And voila, people that donât have sound capabilities to think through complex notions are suddenly responsible for themselves.
I agree about SS and Medicare. They both have been proven to be nothing more than the politiciansâ billy club against American citizens. http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/29/news/economy/fixingsocialsecurity.fortune/
After spending nearly four years as a homeless person in Tallahassee - after living well on a rather high income for years before that - I can really identify with Alice and Elmont. Not every homeless person is crazy or alcoholic, but there are some who simply enjoy the freedom. That freedom comes at a cost, though. The homeless life is not for the lazy.
There is no Medicaid and no Social Security checks for most of Floridaâs homeless. You need to have a disability approved by Social Security to receive those benefits. Few receive food stamps.
Most of the homeless do not begin that life by choice. Many get back on their feet quickly with the help hard work and friends or family. Some adapt and find freedom there. (I know that I got a lot of reading done.) There are a lot of military veterans.
The majority (by choice or necessity) live alone most of the time. There are small group camps but usually camps are spread apart for privacy. As the strip says, ânewbiesâ sometimes come in for a while. I never established a camp, but kept on the move. I had tried shelters but they were bad experiences.
There are few homeless shelters available; only one, âThe Shelter,â is truly free to the needy. God bless them. Another, Hope Community, (also free) is not really a shelter but a true community for the homeless, with counseling and job search training, but there is usually a waiting list.
The others usually charge rent and require you to go âtheirâ church as a condition of staying. We all have our own relationship with the Lord (especially the homeless) but have to attend services that many of us cannot relate to. Most were just too hard-core Baptist for my taste, although there was one particular church where I felt almost at home and attended regularly.
I am blessed to have finally escaped that life with the help of Hope Community, but when I see the homeless today I canât help remembering the freedom and sometimes stop to talk for a while.
Guilden said: âMy memory of the late Sixties and early Seventies was that the Liberals of the day were ardently pushing to release mentally ill people out onto the streetâ.
I donât know where you were living, but in California, it was your hero, Ronald Reagan, who closed the hospitals for the mentally ill, saying that the individual communities should care for them, not the state. He is NOT my definition of a âliberalâ.
Nemesys says first there is no difference between Socialism and Witchcraft, then says itâs not meant to be pejorative - No? He admires witchcraft? You canât have it both ways. I think it WAS meant to be pejorative, actually.
All this uncaring talk of âLet the people do it, let the people invest their own money, blah, blah, blahâ. Look at all the supposedly intelligent people who lost their savings, their retirement, in all these current frauds weâve witnessed recently.
I believe this was caused mostly by government NOT being involved as it should have been. Regardless, if everyone was responsible for their later years, what about the ones who ended up with nothing? Would you people let them starve? Throw them out? I would imagine they would actually have to be taken care of, once again, by the government, so once again the Gov. is involved, or would you rather the Gov. got involved more in protecting peopleâs money? Still more involvement. Talking about âwhat made this country greatâ is ignoring the fact that many, many years have passed since we could just head west and carve out a homestead, and we have about 200 million more people than we used to. My father had a low-paying job all his life, and my mother never worked outside the home, but he was able to buy a house and feed and clothe 7 children on his salary - those days are gone. We NEED government involvement in many areas of our lives now, and ranting about âSocialismâ is an exercise in futility, just another way of expressing hatred of Obama and the âLiberalsâ. Possibly a short prayer to âYou Betchaâ will help your anger, relax you a little.
Ushindi, some of my best friends are Wiccans (Merry meet!!)
My comments were directed to zing at Ms. Pelosi (re: 3hourâs Salem Witch Hunt comments), not at socialists, per se, but your point that itâs a bad analogy is very valid⊠in no way do I wish to demean my Wiccan friends by comparing them to our Speaker of the House.
nemi wrote: â âSocialismâ isnât meant to be pejorative⊠it simply is what it is, so thereâs no need to get defensive about it when it comes up in conversation.â
~~~~CHUCKLE~~~~
Iâm not at all being defensive.
I am just overwearied with people with second grade educations calling everything they donât like socialism or fascism when they know less about these things than they know about quantum chromodynamics.
rricch wrote: â what is the differance between their and there? â
Hereâs what you do.
Get your mommy to RUN (not walk) with you up to the local elementary school.
Have her sign you up ⊠oh say ⊠first grade.
Somewhere between now and the time you get out of high school, you will find the answer to your question.
scott wrote: â But now we have OSHA and a million other things that make stupid stuff like social security unnecessary. â
Please explain how the Occupational Safety and Health Administration makes SS unnecessary?
MelChamp1 over 15 years ago
Isnât this a repeat from a few months back? Maybe GT is on holidayâŠ
3hourtour Premium Member over 15 years ago
âŠwhich reminds meâŠdoesnât this republican/Rush/Fox news âLies /One Nation Under Godâ shouting remind you of the Salem Witch Hunt.Burn um at the stake whether theyâre guilty or not âcuz we just feel like burninâ somethinâ.Wait,that reminds me of the KKKâŠnever mind,I get where theyâre coming from,nowâŠ
Alabama Al over 15 years ago
GT is now 61 years-old. I suspect the creative juices are now beginning to flow a little less forcefully than they use to. I suppose if Charles Shultz can republish his cartoon strip (which became increasingly more redundant as the years wore on) from beyond the grave, Trudeau can take an occasional break.
Nemesys over 15 years ago
3hourtour, I wasnât there at Salem (did CNN cover that?), but in both instances, people were afraid of insideous evil dark forces that they had reason to believe were trying to take over their lives and those of their children.
Socialism, witchcraft, whatâs the difference? Nancy Pelosi makes a great spokesmodel for both.
Nemesys over 15 years ago
Joe Allen, I wish I didnât have to contribute to Social Security or Medicare⊠if I had my own and my employers contributions to invest myself, I would do much, much better than the ponzi schemes created by these manatory social programs, all of which are expected to go broke without major interventions.
Donât even you left-wing loons wish you could withdraw the money that you and your employers invested in these programs and make real decisions that would ensure you and your families futures? Wouldnât it be great if you could leave these earnings to your family?
Socialism is about not being able to make crucial decisions about what you have earned through your hard work for the âcommon goodâ. Itâs a sacrifice enforced by the governmentâs gun. Why want more of it?
misterwhite over 15 years ago
Joe Allen wrote: â Why do you radical right-wing Republicans confuse social programs with socialism? â
LOL
Probably because they have 6 letters in common. Which is why they have done away with ice cream socials at the churches.
Also, it is the nastiest word they can come up with to interject in a sensible discussion on issues of national import.
Nemi wrote: â Socialism is about not being able to make crucial decisions about what you have earned through your hard work for the âcommon goodâ. â
Socialism is what FLAMING ILLITERATES call the necessity of government involvement in aspects of the economy for which their exists no competition and for which free market forces simply cannot work.
Nemesys over 15 years ago
âSocialismâ isnât meant to be pejorative⊠it simply is what it is, so thereâs no need to get defensive about it when it comes up in conversation. I have no problem with the concept of socailism when it works, as it does for public safety and transportation. I do have a problem with it when it is used to allow the government make choices that free persons should be making for themselves.
Having choices is what it means to be free. Having choices taken away is the foundation of tyranny, no matter who takes them away, why they are taken away, or how benevolent the motives⊠and governments very seldom have benevolent motives.
Kosher71 over 15 years ago
lol A subset , of class warfare ?
Guilden_NL over 15 years ago
My memory of the late Sixties and early Seventies was that the Liberals of the day were ardently pushing to release mentally ill people out onto the street. And voila, people that donât have sound capabilities to think through complex notions are suddenly responsible for themselves.
I agree about SS and Medicare. They both have been proven to be nothing more than the politiciansâ billy club against American citizens. http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/29/news/economy/fixingsocialsecurity.fortune/
jumbobrain over 15 years ago
I think itâs a rerun as wellâŠI donât know the specifics but I believe Trudeauâs current contract lets him do that.
Canât complain, really, this is one of fairly few comic strips that remains relevant and clever.
jdeking2 over 15 years ago
After spending nearly four years as a homeless person in Tallahassee - after living well on a rather high income for years before that - I can really identify with Alice and Elmont. Not every homeless person is crazy or alcoholic, but there are some who simply enjoy the freedom. That freedom comes at a cost, though. The homeless life is not for the lazy.
There is no Medicaid and no Social Security checks for most of Floridaâs homeless. You need to have a disability approved by Social Security to receive those benefits. Few receive food stamps.
Most of the homeless do not begin that life by choice. Many get back on their feet quickly with the help hard work and friends or family. Some adapt and find freedom there. (I know that I got a lot of reading done.) There are a lot of military veterans.
The majority (by choice or necessity) live alone most of the time. There are small group camps but usually camps are spread apart for privacy. As the strip says, ânewbiesâ sometimes come in for a while. I never established a camp, but kept on the move. I had tried shelters but they were bad experiences.
There are few homeless shelters available; only one, âThe Shelter,â is truly free to the needy. God bless them. Another, Hope Community, (also free) is not really a shelter but a true community for the homeless, with counseling and job search training, but there is usually a waiting list.
The others usually charge rent and require you to go âtheirâ church as a condition of staying. We all have our own relationship with the Lord (especially the homeless) but have to attend services that many of us cannot relate to. Most were just too hard-core Baptist for my taste, although there was one particular church where I felt almost at home and attended regularly.
I am blessed to have finally escaped that life with the help of Hope Community, but when I see the homeless today I canât help remembering the freedom and sometimes stop to talk for a while.
Ushindi over 15 years ago
Guilden said: âMy memory of the late Sixties and early Seventies was that the Liberals of the day were ardently pushing to release mentally ill people out onto the streetâ.
I donât know where you were living, but in California, it was your hero, Ronald Reagan, who closed the hospitals for the mentally ill, saying that the individual communities should care for them, not the state. He is NOT my definition of a âliberalâ.
Nemesys says first there is no difference between Socialism and Witchcraft, then says itâs not meant to be pejorative - No? He admires witchcraft? You canât have it both ways. I think it WAS meant to be pejorative, actually.
All this uncaring talk of âLet the people do it, let the people invest their own money, blah, blah, blahâ. Look at all the supposedly intelligent people who lost their savings, their retirement, in all these current frauds weâve witnessed recently. I believe this was caused mostly by government NOT being involved as it should have been. Regardless, if everyone was responsible for their later years, what about the ones who ended up with nothing? Would you people let them starve? Throw them out? I would imagine they would actually have to be taken care of, once again, by the government, so once again the Gov. is involved, or would you rather the Gov. got involved more in protecting peopleâs money? Still more involvement. Talking about âwhat made this country greatâ is ignoring the fact that many, many years have passed since we could just head west and carve out a homestead, and we have about 200 million more people than we used to. My father had a low-paying job all his life, and my mother never worked outside the home, but he was able to buy a house and feed and clothe 7 children on his salary - those days are gone. We NEED government involvement in many areas of our lives now, and ranting about âSocialismâ is an exercise in futility, just another way of expressing hatred of Obama and the âLiberalsâ. Possibly a short prayer to âYou Betchaâ will help your anger, relax you a little.
Nemesys over 15 years ago
Ushindi, some of my best friends are Wiccans (Merry meet!!)
My comments were directed to zing at Ms. Pelosi (re: 3hourâs Salem Witch Hunt comments), not at socialists, per se, but your point that itâs a bad analogy is very valid⊠in no way do I wish to demean my Wiccan friends by comparing them to our Speaker of the House.
Sorry, guys. Bright Blessings, 93/93
FriscoLou over 15 years ago
How many Republicans has it been since Roosevelt ripped the Robber Barons an extra one, and cared about the environment?
With this group, old TR must be spittinâ in his grave. They donât make em that way any more.
Bully, Bully
misterwhite over 15 years ago
nemi wrote: â âSocialismâ isnât meant to be pejorative⊠it simply is what it is, so thereâs no need to get defensive about it when it comes up in conversation.â
~~~~CHUCKLE~~~~
Iâm not at all being defensive.
I am just overwearied with people with second grade educations calling everything they donât like socialism or fascism when they know less about these things than they know about quantum chromodynamics.
rricch wrote: â what is the differance between their and there? â
Hereâs what you do.
Get your mommy to RUN (not walk) with you up to the local elementary school.
Have her sign you up ⊠oh say ⊠first grade.
Somewhere between now and the time you get out of high school, you will find the answer to your question.
scott wrote: â But now we have OSHA and a million other things that make stupid stuff like social security unnecessary. â
Please explain how the Occupational Safety and Health Administration makes SS unnecessary?