Reminds me of the news article from over 40 years ago where a burglar sued a home owner for personal injury because he fell and sustained “serious injury” after stepping on a kids toy truck in the dark while leaving the premises. And even stupider was the fact that the Homeowner’s Insurance company lost the case at trial.
Charlie should counter-sue his client, stating he is not responsible for the stupidity of his client. Furthermore, by submitting such a legal brief, it is an admission of guilt of theft by his client and full restitution is demanded.
KenTheCoffinDweller about 7 years ago
Reminds me of the news article from over 40 years ago where a burglar sued a home owner for personal injury because he fell and sustained “serious injury” after stepping on a kids toy truck in the dark while leaving the premises. And even stupider was the fact that the Homeowner’s Insurance company lost the case at trial.
GROG Premium Member about 7 years ago
Charlie should counter-sue his client, stating he is not responsible for the stupidity of his client. Furthermore, by submitting such a legal brief, it is an admission of guilt of theft by his client and full restitution is demanded.
Good morning Crew!
Norman L Jones about 7 years ago
USA is way to liberal, allowing someone to sue you because you looked a them cross eyed. Too many lawyers making the laws.
pchemcat about 7 years ago
This would be funny if it weren’t so true nowadays.
rgcviper about 7 years ago
Interesting mix between a compliment and an insult …
Happy Friday, Crew.
Dry and Dusty Premium Member about 7 years ago
Ain’t goin’ there, tempted as I am! No Sir! Got plenty I could say, but won’t! ;-)
Good Evening Crew!
griffon8 about 7 years ago
One, in the US, anyone can sue anyone for any reason.
Two, Charlie’s lawyer will file a motion to dismiss on the grounds that even if all the allegations were true, it’s all the rabbit’s fault.
I’d like to give a shout out to @OpenArgs which does the podcast from which I’ve learned almost everything I know about the law.