Close to Home by John McPherson for April 07, 2019

  1. F72798fc 23b3 4446 ba71 c86071cde6f1
    Strob Premium Member over 5 years ago

    If #5 is supposed to be Waldo, the colorist didn’t get the joke either.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    Stevefk  over 5 years ago

    Proves that picking out a criminal is more than just seeings things as black and white!

     •  Reply
  3. 1628996 t1
    enigmamz  over 5 years ago

    Did #2 say that? That would be an egregious breaking of character!

     •  Reply
  4. 4096749862 867f82c19d
    PO' DAWG  over 5 years ago

    “He was a monster I tell you.” Ask number three to step forward, smile and laugh like a jackass"

     •  Reply
  5. Profile msn
    vaughnrl2003 Premium Member over 5 years ago

    Another reason why eye witnesses are the lowest level of evidence.

     •  Reply
  6. Stinker
    cuzinron47  over 5 years ago

    The usual suspects.

     •  Reply
  7. Great view up here
    comixbomix  over 5 years ago

    What if it turns out to have been Tony the Tiger???

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    banjinshiju  over 5 years ago

    It would explain why it is so hard to find Waldo. He’s doing 5 to 10 upstate.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    ekke  over 5 years ago

    Can’t be number one: blind men can’t stick up people for purses!

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    ekke  over 5 years ago

    Can’t be number two: mimes are silent.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Close to Home