Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
Ugly as the N-word is, it forcibly reminds the reader that Jim is black and that slavery was imposed on blacks. Take it out of âHuck Finnâ and you take away that power. Some people will convince themselves that Jim was white (I know that sounds insane. But I have run into people who believe that slavery included whites as slaves, which somehow means slavery wasnât racist.)
The emotional highpoint of the book occurs when Huck realizes that not only is âNââ Jimâ a human being with actual feelings, but that Jim is also a friend that Huck is willing to break the law for, even if it means cheating that nice old lady who owns Jim and going to hell for it.
Of course the word was degrading, but showing how slaves were treated is necessary to establishing the drama of Huckâs decision and the power of the story.
Iâm not going to wade in on the controversy. I never saw my first black person until I was ten. I only wondered what is his problem. The kid saved my hide one day, ânuff said!
Any âdistinguished Twain scholarâ who agrees to bowdlerize Twain for money should be tarred, feathered, and rode out of town on a rail, then thrown down Hollidayâs Hill.
To paraphrase my comment from yesterday, there are school systems where âHuckleberry Finnâ is not taught or even available due to the close-mindedness of parents and school boards. This is an attempt to at least expose the kids to the literature that they would otherwise never see.
Looking through the bookstore for stories for my young nieces, I see any number of condensed/retold/aged-down booksâ Hans Brinker, Black Beauty, Little Women, and the likeâ the idea is to get the kids interested, and when they are old enough they can read the full version.
The thing that struck me the first time I read the book - I was about 10 - was when Huck discovered Jim had the same color of blood as Huck. Gave me a chill then and is still powerful today.
aircraft-engineer, I have just glanced at the two degrees in history hanging on my wall. I see no significant holes in my understanding of this part of American history.
Indentured slavery was not the same as the chattel slavery forced on Africans, even though chattel slavery had its roots in indentured servitude. Even those indentured servants who were forced into it through unjust legal procedures always had access to the courts to seek redress, and when their service ended they were free.
The first African arrivees in the English colonies were, as I recall, treated like indentured servants. That did not last long. They were unaware of English law and customs, and as quite a few people observed, when they ran away they were easy to identify. (This is echoed in Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution, which differentiates between âfree persons, including those bound to service for a term of yearsâ and excluding âthree fifths of all other persons.â) It was easy for slave-owners to take advantage of their situation, and it is plain that racism was a factor in white acceptance of their enslavement.
Blacks also fought back, cf. maroons and assorted rebellions, bloodily suppressed, as well as the service of approximately 200,000 men of color in the Union forces.
You are also wrong about the draft, which was voluntarily if grudgingly accepted as a necessity in the Civil War, two World Wars and part of the Cold War. The matter of the swastika in post-War Germany is irrelevant.
Eldo Disc Golf, West Germanyâs postwar ban on the swastika was not imposed as an effort to conceal the past. It was part of a ban on the Nazi party itself. Everyone feared a resurgence of the Nazi party. There was enough activity to bear out that fear, including a relatively small neo-Nazi party (canât recall its name right now.) They were well-aware of the past.
If it seems insane that any Germans would want to restore the party that led them into disaster, stop and look at the results from our last election. (And to anyone who says that I just compared the Republican party to the Nazis: stuff it.)
If you think the Huck Finn idiocy is bad, a certain group (I wonât mention names) tried to have âThe Little Rascalsâ comedies and Disneyâs âSong of the Southâ banned because they didnât show slavery as evil enough (in Disneyâs case) and because they portrayed âAlfalfaâ and âBuckwheatâ as stereotypes.
Thankfully the Supreme Court ruled that the films were an innocent product of their times and contained no deliberate malicious content.
People are just not able to accept the past as the past and use it as a guidepost - not a hitching postâŠ
Only took two years to forget for a lot of folks in this country, Saucy. Soon theyâll have hopped right back into the same sinking ship. but at least their captain will have a face that isnâ t that of a N_ Arab.
I was born in 37 and was an avid reader (also donât think I met any black people until HS-where we had a large percentage in Chicago âburbs). I read H G Wells and many other authors as well as childrenâs stories (OâHenry, Poe and many others, loved Nancy Drew and slightly later got into Asimov and many other good Sci Fi authors). I never read Twain (was also never required to read other books that are on many lists). I only now have decided to read a complete collection of Chaucher this year. A teenage granddaughter called me for her report on black history month to get my remembrances.
Bill Thompson about 14 years ago
Ugly as the N-word is, it forcibly reminds the reader that Jim is black and that slavery was imposed on blacks. Take it out of âHuck Finnâ and you take away that power. Some people will convince themselves that Jim was white (I know that sounds insane. But I have run into people who believe that slavery included whites as slaves, which somehow means slavery wasnât racist.)
The Old Wolf about 14 years ago
âWell, I DID pay you back some of it wunst.â
âYes, you didââbout six chaws. You borryâd store tobacker and paid back slave-head.â
Nope. It just doesnât have the same feel to it⊠mostly because itâs not how people talked.
pschearer Premium Member about 14 years ago
The emotional highpoint of the book occurs when Huck realizes that not only is âNââ Jimâ a human being with actual feelings, but that Jim is also a friend that Huck is willing to break the law for, even if it means cheating that nice old lady who owns Jim and going to hell for it.
Of course the word was degrading, but showing how slaves were treated is necessary to establishing the drama of Huckâs decision and the power of the story.
Yukoneric about 14 years ago
Iâm not going to wade in on the controversy. I never saw my first black person until I was ten. I only wondered what is his problem. The kid saved my hide one day, ânuff said!
ChiehHsia about 14 years ago
Any âdistinguished Twain scholarâ who agrees to bowdlerize Twain for money should be tarred, feathered, and rode out of town on a rail, then thrown down Hollidayâs Hill.
librisleo about 14 years ago
Exactly, Orgelspieler! And Pab is quite right. When one of our library books is challenged, 9 times out of ten, the person has not read the book.
steverinoCT about 14 years ago
To paraphrase my comment from yesterday, there are school systems where âHuckleberry Finnâ is not taught or even available due to the close-mindedness of parents and school boards. This is an attempt to at least expose the kids to the literature that they would otherwise never see.
Looking through the bookstore for stories for my young nieces, I see any number of condensed/retold/aged-down booksâ Hans Brinker, Black Beauty, Little Women, and the likeâ the idea is to get the kids interested, and when they are old enough they can read the full version.
celeconecca about 14 years ago
The thing that struck me the first time I read the book - I was about 10 - was when Huck discovered Jim had the same color of blood as Huck. Gave me a chill then and is still powerful today.
Bill Thompson about 14 years ago
aircraft-engineer, I have just glanced at the two degrees in history hanging on my wall. I see no significant holes in my understanding of this part of American history.
Indentured slavery was not the same as the chattel slavery forced on Africans, even though chattel slavery had its roots in indentured servitude. Even those indentured servants who were forced into it through unjust legal procedures always had access to the courts to seek redress, and when their service ended they were free.
The first African arrivees in the English colonies were, as I recall, treated like indentured servants. That did not last long. They were unaware of English law and customs, and as quite a few people observed, when they ran away they were easy to identify. (This is echoed in Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution, which differentiates between âfree persons, including those bound to service for a term of yearsâ and excluding âthree fifths of all other persons.â) It was easy for slave-owners to take advantage of their situation, and it is plain that racism was a factor in white acceptance of their enslavement.
Blacks also fought back, cf. maroons and assorted rebellions, bloodily suppressed, as well as the service of approximately 200,000 men of color in the Union forces.
You are also wrong about the draft, which was voluntarily if grudgingly accepted as a necessity in the Civil War, two World Wars and part of the Cold War. The matter of the swastika in post-War Germany is irrelevant.
Bill Thompson about 14 years ago
Eldo Disc Golf, West Germanyâs postwar ban on the swastika was not imposed as an effort to conceal the past. It was part of a ban on the Nazi party itself. Everyone feared a resurgence of the Nazi party. There was enough activity to bear out that fear, including a relatively small neo-Nazi party (canât recall its name right now.) They were well-aware of the past.
If it seems insane that any Germans would want to restore the party that led them into disaster, stop and look at the results from our last election. (And to anyone who says that I just compared the Republican party to the Nazis: stuff it.)
craigwestlake about 14 years ago
If you think the Huck Finn idiocy is bad, a certain group (I wonât mention names) tried to have âThe Little Rascalsâ comedies and Disneyâs âSong of the Southâ banned because they didnât show slavery as evil enough (in Disneyâs case) and because they portrayed âAlfalfaâ and âBuckwheatâ as stereotypes. Thankfully the Supreme Court ruled that the films were an innocent product of their times and contained no deliberate malicious content. People are just not able to accept the past as the past and use it as a guidepost - not a hitching postâŠ
Saucy1121 Premium Member about 14 years ago
I canât attribute the quote, because I forget where I first read it but, âthose who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it.â
freeholder1 about 14 years ago
Only took two years to forget for a lot of folks in this country, Saucy. Soon theyâll have hopped right back into the same sinking ship. but at least their captain will have a face that isnâ t that of a N_ Arab.
vldazzle about 14 years ago
I was born in 37 and was an avid reader (also donât think I met any black people until HS-where we had a large percentage in Chicago âburbs). I read H G Wells and many other authors as well as childrenâs stories (OâHenry, Poe and many others, loved Nancy Drew and slightly later got into Asimov and many other good Sci Fi authors). I never read Twain (was also never required to read other books that are on many lists). I only now have decided to read a complete collection of Chaucher this year. A teenage granddaughter called me for her report on black history month to get my remembrances.
pschearer Premium Member about 14 years ago
Fact: Agatha Christieâs story âTen Little Indiansâ was originally published as âTen Little Nââsâ. Times change.
dwjensen about 14 years ago
@Radamanthus - But try to find a Disney-issued copy of âSong of the Southâ today.