If it’s about the laterst terror attack in France, it’s delusional. Disgusting example: while media worldwide were reporting that a French history teacher had been beheaded by an islamist terrorist, the New York Times chose this headline “French police shoot and kill man after a fatal knife attack on the street”. No mention of the victim, no mention of the beheading, no mention that the attacker was an islamist. No, instead, trying to make it look like what mattered was that French police kills people. As if we needed more proofs, after they terminated their political cartoons department, that the New York Times is biased pro-muslim fundamentalists rag no better in their insidious ways than QAnon.
Pickled Pete over 3 years ago
When you’re the one to make the first comment, it sure helps to know what the cartoon is about.
chris.lemarie over 3 years ago
I think it could be about the reaction to the latest terror attack in France.Or to the proliferation of armed militias in the US.
Dr. Quatermass over 3 years ago
I feel like Homer reading a Far Side calendar.
ruthkando over 3 years ago
I see the leaders pushing back the comments of the people with force at the ready.
buer over 3 years ago
If it’s about the laterst terror attack in France, it’s delusional. Disgusting example: while media worldwide were reporting that a French history teacher had been beheaded by an islamist terrorist, the New York Times chose this headline “French police shoot and kill man after a fatal knife attack on the street”. No mention of the victim, no mention of the beheading, no mention that the attacker was an islamist. No, instead, trying to make it look like what mattered was that French police kills people. As if we needed more proofs, after they terminated their political cartoons department, that the New York Times is biased pro-muslim fundamentalists rag no better in their insidious ways than QAnon.