The way the women in the Celtics organization were treated by the trolls was disgusting. None of us know the entire story about Udoka’s suspension, but it is obvious that his behavior was so bad that the punishment was warranted. If he used his position to take advantage of someone else then he and not the other person is at fault. The speculation about the female employees only made the whole thing worse.
Okay…if it was a consensual relationship, neither forced nor coerced, but truly consensual, then the Celtics organization could have simply stated that Udoka violated team policy and was duly fired. The public wouldn’t have to be told the details. As it stands, the Celtics organization presented just enough info to make Udoka look like some kind of predator. If the relationship was consensual but inappropriate, they should have been clear about that. If they felt that the female staffer was a victim, they should have been clear about that. On top of that, they left Udoka’s career twisting in the wind, and left what really happened, and to whom it may have happened, to the imagination of the public. It was poorly handled to say the least.
Geophyzz about 2 years ago
What’s the problem with “relationships” with co-workers? Even Walt Disney married an employee.
Carl Premium Member about 2 years ago
Suffer you shall foolish male that dare offer voice.
Ellis97 about 2 years ago
In the business world, bosses have to keep their relationships with their workers strictly professional or risk being accused of alleged allegations.
joannesshadow about 2 years ago
The way the women in the Celtics organization were treated by the trolls was disgusting. None of us know the entire story about Udoka’s suspension, but it is obvious that his behavior was so bad that the punishment was warranted. If he used his position to take advantage of someone else then he and not the other person is at fault. The speculation about the female employees only made the whole thing worse.
A.Ficionada about 2 years ago
If malethink isn’t a term already, it just started
JoeMartinFan Premium Member about 2 years ago
Okay…if it was a consensual relationship, neither forced nor coerced, but truly consensual, then the Celtics organization could have simply stated that Udoka violated team policy and was duly fired. The public wouldn’t have to be told the details. As it stands, the Celtics organization presented just enough info to make Udoka look like some kind of predator. If the relationship was consensual but inappropriate, they should have been clear about that. If they felt that the female staffer was a victim, they should have been clear about that. On top of that, they left Udoka’s career twisting in the wind, and left what really happened, and to whom it may have happened, to the imagination of the public. It was poorly handled to say the least.
Stat_man99 about 2 years ago
As long as the relationship was consensual, what’s the big deal?
Sailor46 USN 65-95 about 2 years ago
it was consensual, how was that she wasn’t suspended? Aren’t the rules the same for all?