The author of an NYT opinion piece made an interesting observation. If Cannon is removed from the case and replaced with a judge perceived as a liberal, that will give the right-wing a way to accuse the left-wing of manipulating the trial if he is convicted. Conversely, if Cannon remains and Trump is convicted that propaganda trope won’t obtain.
Cannon was at the center of a considerable legal controversy earlier in the classified documents case after she made a ruling that was deemed inordinately preferential to the former president and later overturned by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals as unlawful. Many have since speculated that she will continue to rule in ways that will benefit Trump, leading to calls for her to recuse herself from the case, which she has given no indication that she will do.
Google: Aileen Cannon Overseeing Trump Case Raises ‘3 Enormous Concerns’
Judge Cannon may prove to be too much on Trump’s side, but in a sense, the judge is supposed to protect the rights of the accused. Being merely an unbiased arbiter is not enough for a judge to carry out his/her duties in a trial. We only need to be concerned if her leanings seem to be based on her personal feelings and not her dedication toward the accused and the protection of his rights.
The woke lefty’s continue to cheer on a weaponized DOJ as they celebrate Juneteenth by looting a McDonalds.
The lefty brownshirts, aka the FBI, forced the removal of videos on Biden getting “handsy” with Eva Longoria and also videos of Biden talking about using taxpayer money to bribe foreign officials, resulting in money laundering which ended up in his pockets.
Flashaaway about 1 year ago
Why is the fix always in when it comes to Trump and the law?
Will? about 1 year ago
The eyes of the world are watching, we’ll see if she dares to abuse the law in this case.
scote1379 Premium Member about 1 year ago
I have a feeling that Jack Smith and the DOJ have a plan B !
GOGOPOWERANGERS about 1 year ago
Why stop at a file why not a hacksaw
FreyjaRN Premium Member about 1 year ago
The eyes of the world are on her. She may want to reconsider her favoritism of Birther Boy.
superposition about 1 year ago
As this was a crime committed by a commander-in-chief, why isn’t this a court-martial?
aristoclesplato9 about 1 year ago
Looks like the left is identifying a scapegoat for when Trump is found innocent.
akachman Premium Member about 1 year ago
The world is watching. She cannot change the laws. A felony is a felony no matter how warped your view of the felon.
RitaGB about 1 year ago
Great minds think alike!
https://www.gocomics.com/clayjones/2023/06/20?ct=v&cti=1761989
A# 466 about 1 year ago
The author of an NYT opinion piece made an interesting observation. If Cannon is removed from the case and replaced with a judge perceived as a liberal, that will give the right-wing a way to accuse the left-wing of manipulating the trial if he is convicted. Conversely, if Cannon remains and Trump is convicted that propaganda trope won’t obtain.
Masterskrain about 1 year ago
It wouldn’t do any good to send the Fat Felon a file…he wouldn’t be able to figure out how to use it…too many moving parts!
Zebrastripes about 1 year ago
Jack Smith will request the trial be held in another state, should “she” become a problem AGAIN!
What ever happened to impartial judges in the American judicial system?
GOP ruined everything to their advantage! Greed & power…and they get away with it! WHY IS THAT? ☹️
scote1379 Premium Member about 1 year ago
Lots of great comments on this file , One thing though, it is a Rasp not a file , much more aggressive in use !
For a Just and Peaceful World about 1 year ago
Cannon was at the center of a considerable legal controversy earlier in the classified documents case after she made a ruling that was deemed inordinately preferential to the former president and later overturned by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals as unlawful. Many have since speculated that she will continue to rule in ways that will benefit Trump, leading to calls for her to recuse herself from the case, which she has given no indication that she will do.
Google: Aileen Cannon Overseeing Trump Case Raises ‘3 Enormous Concerns’
198.23.5.11 about 1 year ago
Get the tools….What Tools?
The tools we’ve been using since 2016. Oh,THOSE tools!!
bevtracy2011 about 1 year ago
You nailed it, Clay.
preacherman Premium Member about 1 year ago
Judge Cannon may prove to be too much on Trump’s side, but in a sense, the judge is supposed to protect the rights of the accused. Being merely an unbiased arbiter is not enough for a judge to carry out his/her duties in a trial. We only need to be concerned if her leanings seem to be based on her personal feelings and not her dedication toward the accused and the protection of his rights.
chromosome Premium Member about 1 year ago
Injusticeburger
Radish the wordsmith about 1 year ago
Trial set for Aug 18, snerk!
Sprarklin about 1 year ago
The woke lefty’s continue to cheer on a weaponized DOJ as they celebrate Juneteenth by looting a McDonalds.
The lefty brownshirts, aka the FBI, forced the removal of videos on Biden getting “handsy” with Eva Longoria and also videos of Biden talking about using taxpayer money to bribe foreign officials, resulting in money laundering which ended up in his pockets.