Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for June 21, 2009
Transcript:
Mark: Of course, waterboarding wasn't the only technique we borrowed from the Inquisition... just the only one TV news correspondents cared to try. And Tedd Roosevelt, perhaps mindful that both Washington and Lincoln forbade torture, ordered the courtmartial of a U.S. general accused of waterboarding. Later, after World War II, the U.S. prosecuted interrogators for waterboarding. There was no debate about it being a war crime. Why, then, do half of all Americans now believe torture can be justified in certain circumstances? How could any circumstances be more dire than World War II, when 60 million people perished? This is the legacy of eight years of fear and lawlessness! This is the damage a small band of amoral leaders has done in stripping a nation of its own traditions of decency! Oops... sorry. That was kind of a long introduction. You still there, Secretary Rice? Hello? Madam Secretary? Voice: Hey, Mark? Just FYI, it took two years to book her.
margueritem over 15 years ago
OopsâŚ
StrangeTikiGod over 15 years ago
No great loss. I doubt sheâd have anything intelligent to say, anyway.
mojitobaby over 15 years ago
Uh, not QUITE so cut and dried, Mark. We have a long history of justifying things done âin our national interestâ. We may have prosecuted Japanese waterboarders, but we let a lot of bigger fish go free because they had info we needed to use against Russia. We cut deals with many, including the truly monstrous Shiro Ishii, because we wanted his germ warfare research and expertise. Because of this, there were far few executions in Toyko than in Nuremberg, even though there just as many war criminals.
We dropped our germ warfare program in the 1970âs during Nixonâs admin because the government realized the public would perceive it as unAmerican and dastardly to drop anthrax and other diseases on our enemies - how sad that weâve actually lost that attitude when it comes to waterboarding and torture in general.
DesultoryPhillipic over 15 years ago
Donât forget psychological torture. Letâs hear it for the internment camps!
wizman440 Premium Member over 15 years ago
Obama is sinking this nation daily but you keep on focusing on Bush. Two years from now these hacks will keep saying âfailed policies of the Bush Administrationâ and âwe inherited from the previous administrationâ. But to these guys, Obama is infallible. To quote Ralph Peters, âWe now have a president with Jimmy Carterâs naivete, Richard Nixonâs distaste for laws, Lyndon Johnsonâs commitment to the wrong war, and Bill Clintonâs moral fecklessness.â But theyâll blame Bush for everything anyway.
KenyarJad over 15 years ago
Well, letâs face it - weâre electing people who have shown in the past that they are not exactly fit to be POTUS. Heck, weâre not choosing people in the PRIMARIES that are fit to be President. Truman and Eisenhower were probably the last people from their respective parties that actually werenât a detriment to the office in some way, shape, or form. Since then, both sides have made MAJOR mistakes - Cuban Missile Crisis, Vietnam, Iranian hostages, Iran-Contra, the 1990 Recession, NAFTA and a laissez-faire second term, Bush Junior in general, and now Obama = Clinton Administration 1.8.5.3.4.
Still, yeah, way to go there, dude - totally trash the administration of which your guest was a part. That might work on a show like Howard Stern, but he ainât Howard Stern.
markwalton over 15 years ago
Wizman, I suppose only time will tell as to where Obama ends up taking us, but I think weâre pretty much sunk as it is. If Obama turns out to be just as evil and disastrous as many conservatives fear, then itâs too bad they turned a blind eye, again and again, to the previous administrationâs mistakes and crimes, and claim to want an OBVIOUS, unquestioned monster/idiot like Rush Limbaugh to be in control of the party - I mean, the democrats could almost have chosen Jabba the Hutt at this point, and theyâd still look good compared to the previous/ current republican leadership! They have handed all moral authority to the liberals on a silver platter, deserved or not. I realize itâs too late to say so now, but people who are disappointed that Obama won and is getting a blank check should have demanded more from their leaders and voted differently for the last 8 years. Only Doonesbury could get away with soapboxing so shamelessly and still manage to seem self-depricating and funny instead of preachy (at least to this reader). Kudos!
JonD17 over 15 years ago
I know torture is ethically wrong. I know that it is below human standards. I also know many readers here served during the Viet Nam era and are aware of many American soldiers being tortured in inconcievable ways. Also Ethical standards are a stand alone body of thoughts when it comes to war. How do we balance it all. THERE SIMPLY HAS TO BE NO MORE WAR!!!
markwalton over 15 years ago
PS Mojitobaby is not wrong about the US (or certain divisions of our government, anyway) authorizing legally/morally questionable (to put it kindly) tactics in the interests of national security BEFORE the last 8 years. That in no way vindicates anyone who justifies torture, or makes anyone who condemns torture any less right. There are precedents for all kinds of abominable behavior - itâs still wrong, no matter how accustomed we become to it.
DoctorDan over 15 years ago
Wizman - Peters recently wrote an essay in the Journal of International Security Affairs suggesting that in the future, the military should attack and kill âthe partisan mediaâ. Are you sure heâs someone you want to cite as an authority on the American way?
And we keep blaming Bush? Oh, please. I clearly recall letters to the editor appearing in our local newspaper in late 2003, blaming Bill Clintonâs reductions in force for the problems we were already having in Iraq. Whatever we liberals know about transferring blame and denying responsibilty we learned at the feet of the neo-con masters, starting with the I-canât-think-of any-mistakes-I made Idiot Prince.
lesmcf over 15 years ago
I fin d it significant that there is no comment rebutting this Cartoon. Once again, Trudeau has âhit the nail on the headâ and told it like should be told.
NotFromIceland over 15 years ago
If waterboarding is not torture, why do police departments in the United States not use it on ordinary, run-of-the-mill thugs and murderers to obtain information? If waterboarding is not torture, why does John McCain, who was tortured, say that it is? If waterboarding is not torture, why do U.S. Army regulations forbid it as being torture? If waterboarding is not torture, would you mind if it was practiced on you? If waterboarding is not torture, would it be all right if other countries practiced it on American citizens? If âYou Donât Know Dickâ Cheney is so passionate about protecting the United States, why did he repeatedly decline opportunities to do so when a war was handy during his youth? But thatâs another question.
Potrzebie over 15 years ago
My two cents: may not be logical at times. When is it fair to deviate from our ethical principles? Letâs go back to the trail of tears and manifest destiny. Then there was that confederate POW camp that inspired a movie. Well, we firebombed cities in Germany and Japan without remorse of how many civilians suffered. Then we detonated two ultimate fire-bombs to save american lives. Was this ethical? Probably not.
We love to watch fictionalized anti-hero routines where the torture suspects and save the day. I really doubt that works so well in reality. Can we interrogate suspects humanely? probably so. Now recall that these are suspects not actually convicted terrorists. If you do some research you will find out that some of these guys were picked up by bounty hunters and had trumped up charges.
Ok the finale. We take pride in being better than others but swear that we will fight like cornered rats. But until that time comes, we should not resort to unethical choices, lest that pave the way for attacks on our civil liberties. Of course you will say: that can never happen here. Wrong. A sheriff and his deputies were convicted in Texas for waterboarding perps. Is it an isolated instance. Hardly. There, rambling at points but itâs just my opinion.
longtimecomicsfan over 15 years ago
Letâs seeâŚ
Stock market is up, housing starting to show signs of recovery, secret CIA prisons in Europe closed, Gitmo on the way to closing, GM go into bankruptcy smoothly (versus shutting down quickly and shedding 2 million jobs), and yet thereâs always somebody (led by Gingrich) to say that Obamaâs failing. What a hoot!
P.S. - there havenât been any dastardly terrorist attacks since Jan 20th, have there?
robquill over 15 years ago
Your stimulus package has made its Mark. But first year in office does not necessarily mean the last. We must wait till the fat lady sings or falls over.
Ushindi over 15 years ago
Wizman: As far as many of us are concerned, weâve come out of the dark and into the light. The dark of those eight years of âKing Georgeâ and his merry band. It appears the rule of law (and the Bill of Rights) have returned, so whether Obamaâs policies are brilliant or ridiculous, I believe we are all safer; safer in our own homes. I also remember the shape the country was in at the end of the Clinton administration - peace, prosperity, and a federal surplus - and what it was like when Bush left office. Yes, Obama has inherited a real mess, and I wish him all the luck in the world - I would be crazy not toâŚâŚ
aardvarkseyes over 15 years ago
Itâs a simple equation:
Waterboarding is torture. Torture is a war crime. Cheney has admitted he authorized the use of waterboarding, adding that Bush knew about it and approved of it. Bush and Cheney are guilty of war crimes.So, where are the trials?
mojitobaby over 15 years ago
Wizman, since Obamaâs White House didnât greenlight torture, what heâs doing to âsinkâ the counytry is completely irrelevant here, unless you actually think you can link torture to economic policies. Nice diversionary tactic, tho - but you threw it out there because you donât really have a defense for the indefensible.
Terrorists used to routinely claim that theyâd been tortured by the US and when we flat-out denied it to the world we actually used to believed - it looked like more fanatical hyperbole on their part because there were some things America just didnât do, right?. Welcome to a reality where weâre no better than the unethical âother sideâ - the beheading, poison gas and acid bath-using other side. How soon will it be before we completely become what we fight against? America was also attacked by the Japanese in â41 - but I guarantee that no matter how much we loathed that enemy during WWII, the population here would have recoiled in disgust if theyâd found out we tortured anyone, because weâwere the âgood guysâ â and good guys donât do that sort of thing.
wizman, when the US was attacked on 9/11 there was an amazing outpouring of sympathy and support for us the world over. If the same thing happened today, do you think the reaction would be the same â or would we just get three half-used candles and a âsorry for your lossâ?
If weâve completely lost the ability to judge ourselves and our actions objectively, I can assure you no one else has.
DesultoryPhillipic over 15 years ago
Hey Pete. Be sure to reiterate that last part when Homeland Security swat teams come through your door. When will you people ever learn? Theyâre both on the same side and itâs sure not ours. Neo-cons, Neo-facists. Keep the people polarized so they donât see whatâs really going on.
DaNoot52 over 15 years ago
I see signs of nothing but improvements under ObamaâŚso whereâs the disaster in the making? Iâm disappointed in a few of his actions not going far enough, having to make political concessions, but thatâs reality. The repugs will find any excuse to trash the new liberal leader, but thatâs just politics - people thinking with their ideology instead of their brains. Had more than enough of that with the Bushies - who clearly, obviously and definitely should be on trial for war-crimes. But that would âlook badâ or something, I guess. Putting criminals on trial is a good thing unless they bleeep near ruined the country, in which case I guess they get a pass. Sometimes reality sucks.
Dirty Dragon over 15 years ago
LOL - And Condiâs one of the saner members of that misadministration. Canât wait to hear from Rummy.
tcambeul over 15 years ago
NotfromIceland, I remember d. cheneys famous statement: âI have too many important things to accomplish, to be draftedâ. This, before he slipped in to the university of wyoming & then his wife became pregnant, to supply him with a deferment.
EScott2U over 15 years ago
Waterboarding is NOT TORTURE! It is simply sensory deprivation. The subject of the technique walks away completely intact and uninjured. The instigator walks away with actionable intelligence.
Whatâs the #@¢king problem here??????????
reinharden over 15 years ago
How could any circumstances be more dire? In 1945, a single individual didnât have the capability of killing a million people with a suitcase sized device.
Does that capability justify torture (however we choose to define it)? Thatâs harder to say.
But itâs definitely sticking with the big lie to pretend that the circumstances in 2009 are the same as the circumstances were in 1945.
reinharden
RonBerg13 Premium Member over 15 years ago
And the difference between water boarding a terrorist and sucking out the brains of a partially born baby is?