Matt Davies for September 30, 2008

Wolf! Wolf!

Still flush with political capital.

how that guy managed to have two mandates still beats me.

CF: Does the words “Vote Fraud” have the same meaning in Canada???

;-D

CF- He had to cheat to even look like he won, he never had a mandate. Except from the neo-cons.

I don’t like the old “He stole the election” arguement, too easy to use without proof.

Perfect!

Non, merci, Ti-Georges!

There is more than enough evidence that the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen and/or tampered with enough to alter the outcome (in favor of republicans). A good article by Robert Kennedy Jr: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/wasthe2004electionstolen

“There is more than enough evidence that the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen and/or tampered with enough to alter the outcome”

Oh come off it already! The Rolling Stone!? Really? I wonder what Highlights thinks since I could just as easily read that magazine the next time I’m in the Dentist’s office!

You could possibly have a case with 2000 if it wasn’t already proven untrue but 2004!? Kerry got slaughtered there was no tampering there or even alleged.

Besides, your guy is more than likely to win 2008 anyway so calm down.

What, TGS, we should calm down because even though 2000 was stolen, we’re going to win now? Are you kidding? After the Republicans spent millions getting bupkiss out of Whitewater? Now we should roll over? And by the way, it wasn’t disproven. The final analysis indicates Gore would have won had the Supreme Court not decided to circumvent the will of the people. Funny how the conservatives didn’t talk about that bit of court activism.

I’ll point out to you that the Democrats themselves don’t even say this bleeep anymore but you won’t care about that because you have your religious belief that Bush stole the election.

Nothing I say is going to matter though, you’re going to falsely believe what Gore himself doesn’t anymore.