Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for September 14, 2011

  1. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member about 13 years ago

    The Lester Thurow special is whatever the vendor can swipe from a passing food cart..(Really obscure joke – LT wrote “The Zero-Sum Society;” its thesis is that the economic role of the State is to “allocate loss.”)

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    feverjr Premium Member about 13 years ago

    And he’s serving free sweet “tea” with every “simple” meal.

     •  Reply
  3. Version 2
    dwandelt Premium Member about 13 years ago

    About time Keynesian economics was exposed for the fraud it is!

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    roctor  about 13 years ago

    Discounts for water carriers and coolaide bought in bulk.

     •  Reply
  5. Klinger1
    walruscarver2000  about 13 years ago

    @towerwarlockGive it a rest!!

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    eepatt  about 13 years ago

    “Non-Sequitur”is one of the best comics published because it provokes thought and ideas worth discussing. Mr. warlock has neither ideas nor thoughts and he has not yet figured out that name calling is not discussion.

     •  Reply
  7. 76d61a1e 24f8 4715 9907 6808c455736a
    neatslob Premium Member about 13 years ago

    He probably still thinks that giving tax breaks to millionaires creates jobs.

     •  Reply
  8. Franco s trattoria
    StoicLion1973  about 13 years ago

    @towerwarlock – your mistake was singling out one political view in your comment. In the future you should keep it neutral so readers can transplant their own views/opinions into it. That way pseudo-intellectuals can feel smarter than they are, and those with a good sense of humor can get a chuckle out of what has been a banal strip lately.

     •  Reply
  9. Frog4
    Digital Frog  about 13 years ago

    I prefer being a cartoon punned it.

     •  Reply
  10. Jude
    tcolkett  about 13 years ago

    Your simplistic understanding of what Wiley is referring to here is consistent with the theories being “sold” in the cartoon. There are simplistic theories out there and they are coming from the right. Don’t even pretend you don’t understand that you lackey tool.

     •  Reply
  11. Erroll for ror
    celeconecca  about 13 years ago

    love “smarm au jus” – just can’t have smarm without oozing a little

     •  Reply
  12. Erroll for ror
    celeconecca  about 13 years ago

    yes, I know that sounds wrong, but it was meant well.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    jmalmstrom  about 13 years ago

    Actually the Keynsian model is rather complex. If you want simplistic, look no further than the Laffer Curve. Remember: If your pholosophy can fit on a bumper sticker, it probably belongs there.

     •  Reply
  14. Gocomixavatar02d
    ANQuixote  about 13 years ago

    I’ll have the special of the day: a Grande tea with a triple shot of Kool-Aid! Mmm-mmm!

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    hitman4cookies  about 13 years ago

    A Tea Party joint?

     •  Reply
  16. 8724545 avatar medium
    runninanreadin  about 13 years ago

    Is there such a thing as “Simplistic Economic Theories”? Let’s get 2 economists together to sort this question out ONCE AND FOR ALL! lol

     •  Reply
  17. Hawaii5 0girl
    treered  about 13 years ago

    you can take all the economists in the world, lay them end to end, and still not come to a conclusion…

     •  Reply
  18. Tt2
    TheSpanishInquisition  about 13 years ago

    Tasty…

     •  Reply
  19. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member about 13 years ago

    The Laffer Curve is just a fancy graphic for the Law of Diminishing Returns, and it applies to more than just taxation. .Why do people reject the notion that it is possible for the tax level to reach a point that reduces GDP?

     •  Reply
  20. Hawaii5 0girl
    treered  about 13 years ago

    be easy on tower:

    “…You was wrong about Potts.

    Yes, from his point of view, at his age, l was.

    The girls was right about the gossip.

    From their point of view.

    What other point is there?

    You have to figure that out for yourself…"

    he’ll learn, eventually…

     •  Reply
  21. Yellow pig small
    bmonk  about 13 years ago

    If they got two economists together to discuss something, they’d probably end up with 5 theories to explain why the current economy is impossible.

     •  Reply
  22. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  about 13 years ago

    “Reaganomics” required a new unit of measure to sell it: the “Simple ton”.

     •  Reply
  23. Carabao 1  751647
    whitecarabao  about 13 years ago

    Towerwarlock, you left out the Republican Neofeudal Grand Oligarch Party which is just as inept, inane, and incompetent. Ideologies, right or left, are a disaster in the economic community. “It has always failed in the past, so let’s try it again.”

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    roctor  about 13 years ago

    Christian Republican American Party.I like that.

     •  Reply
  25. Carabao 1  751647
    whitecarabao  about 13 years ago

    I enjoy this strip. Wiley’s commentary is spot on and reminds me of my beloved Pogo. Wiley and Walt Kelly give the sharp end of the stick to whomever deserves it.As far as economic theories go, Wiley has the shown the honest truth. Not one of them is worth the paper they are printed on. That is especially so for those based on “sound mathematical principles” because they totally ignore the greatest driving force in economics: GREED. It is like trying to calculate ballistic trajectories or orbits to six decimal places but ignoring gravity — utter nonsense and a waste of time.

     •  Reply
  26. Cman
    kakabeka  about 13 years ago

    To cesspoolwarlock:

    Why must there be people like you you wasting oxygen????pos typical teabaggin faux news viewer

    /“Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.” – Andre Gide

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    WaitingMan  about 13 years ago

    I don’t usually defend Ron Paul but he said he wouldn’t let an uninsured person die. It was psycho tea-partiers screaming from the audience that letting them die was OK.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    WaitingMan  about 13 years ago

    My guess is that several of the other candidates on that stage would agree with the psychos in the audience.

     •  Reply
  29. Thinker1
    Fan o’ Lio.  about 13 years ago

    If you took all the (fill in the blank) and laid them end to end , it would serve them right.

     •  Reply
  30. Franco s trattoria
    StoicLion1973  about 13 years ago

    ALL – notice how Wiley didn’t single out any party but people have. Thank you for proving my point.

    @Tom – The US is not a democratic experiment, that’s just a slogan. It could probably fit on a bumper sticker.

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    hippogriff  about 13 years ago

    jmalmstrom: My version is “Truth cannot fit on a bumper sticker” – unfortunately neither can that one.

     •  Reply
  32. Snoopy pensive typewriter
    The Life I Draw Upon  about 13 years ago

    You are the pundit, I mean expert.

     •  Reply
  33. Missing large
    steven02345  about 13 years ago

    “This begins to explain alot about the Democratic National Socialist Party and where they get their inept ideas about what works and what does not.” I suppose the Partito Nazionale Republicana having tax broken us into a recession have a claim to the better idea because God is on their side and talks to the GOPE ?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur