Am I the only one who has trouble seeing the artisist’s intent? The man is neither standing nor sitting, but depicted in an unstable position. Is the woman standing or sitting? How does the hooker idea get inspired? What is the stuff on the ground?
Glad to hear you’re better Marge.@CodeDaddy, the painting style is quite typical of those early impressionists (including Manet when he did clothed ladies). People dressed very formally to appear in public and their posture was also not what we would see as normal today. I can still remember when I dressed in a good business suit or dress and heels to fly on airlines. It was a pleasure then as they made every attempt to accomodate us (I carried all my liquids on board and even took a concrete statue onboard).
Painting discussed here. Description identifies everyone (artist is at the very far left) in the painting. Marc Bazille was the artist’s uncle and Camille was simply Marc’s daughter (fun little website) — not Camille Doncieux, model and first wife of Claude Monet, as I first thought because of their friendship with the artist around the time of the painting. They marry June, 28, 1870, and in August, 1870, the artist enlists, only to be killed in battle, November 28 of that year.So far, 2 works by this artist have appeared in Mr. Melcher’s blog.
margueritem about 13 years ago
Yes, those stares would be exactly the correct reaction.
margueritem about 13 years ago
That would certainly make them stare!
pcolli about 13 years ago
“Ah, there you are Lord & Lady Barmouth. We were just about to start the orgy without you.”
chireef about 13 years ago
that picture always reminded me of Rubaiyat’s poem “A loaf of bread a jug of wine and thou”
chireef about 13 years ago
never thought of them as ladies of easy virtue
zero about 13 years ago
What this world needs is a good nickel houri. Failing that, a good dime a dance. . ..
wilb44 about 13 years ago
A bring your own lampshade type of party.
Ottodesu about 13 years ago
I love it when this happens.
finale about 13 years ago
snerk
vwdualnomand about 13 years ago
could be worse….could be the dea, and they are all arrested for meth.
Coyoty Premium Member about 13 years ago
“Boopsie, we told you, NO GUESTS!”
APersonOfInterest about 13 years ago
The “ladies” following Gen. Hooker’s troops during the Civil War became known as “hookers” … (before 1865)
Plods with ...™ about 13 years ago
crickets chirping
mabrndt Premium Member about 13 years ago
Enlarged (Mr. Melcher got the date wrong again, the artist was 8 or 9 in 1850)
Happy, happy, happy!!! Premium Member about 13 years ago
lady in blue on the right looks interested.“mmm. i wonder if she will come to my party.”
PICTO about 13 years ago
The invitation clearly stated: The Rt. Hon. Dogsniff and Escort. In a mighty fancy script I must say.
MaxNuclear about 13 years ago
Yes, this is my fiance. Ms. Gaga is a musical performer.
blackdawne about 13 years ago
President Obama walking into a Young Republicans meeting.
aarken about 13 years ago
The two guys on the left aren’t particularly interested in the new arrival..
lindaf about 13 years ago
Yeah, I imagine virtue did not come easily to them….
bossyheifer about 13 years ago
VOGUE!
libbydog about 13 years ago
way too much skin showing
wtfwtf about 13 years ago
“‘Ah, Speaker Gingrich, welcome to the party. Which wife would this one happen to be?’”
WINNER!V-Beast about 13 years ago
“whoops, pardon my wardrobe malfunction.”
codedaddy about 13 years ago
Am I the only one who has trouble seeing the artisist’s intent? The man is neither standing nor sitting, but depicted in an unstable position. Is the woman standing or sitting? How does the hooker idea get inspired? What is the stuff on the ground?
vldazzle about 13 years ago
Glad to hear you’re better Marge.@CodeDaddy, the painting style is quite typical of those early impressionists (including Manet when he did clothed ladies). People dressed very formally to appear in public and their posture was also not what we would see as normal today. I can still remember when I dressed in a good business suit or dress and heels to fly on airlines. It was a pleasure then as they made every attempt to accomodate us (I carried all my liquids on board and even took a concrete statue onboard).
mabrndt Premium Member about 13 years ago
Enlarged Manet’s Painting
Call me Ishmael about 13 years ago
yeth!
Call me Ishmael about 13 years ago
…and then the food fight broke out…
mabrndt Premium Member almost 13 years ago
Painting discussed here. Description identifies everyone (artist is at the very far left) in the painting. Marc Bazille was the artist’s uncle and Camille was simply Marc’s daughter (fun little website) — not Camille Doncieux, model and first wife of Claude Monet, as I first thought because of their friendship with the artist around the time of the painting. They marry June, 28, 1870, and in August, 1870, the artist enlists, only to be killed in battle, November 28 of that year.So far, 2 works by this artist have appeared in Mr. Melcher’s blog.
mabrndt Premium Member over 12 years ago
Here is another work by this artist.
briggs.roy078 over 2 years ago
Quoi? Oh, non non non non!