Prickly City by Scott Stantis for August 02, 2018

  1. Ddwiz avatar
    DD Wiz  over 6 years ago

    Scott Stantis picked a story arc based on a false premise and he’s gonna ride it until his credibility runs out, which was, like, three days ago. The right wing wacko obsession with Hillary is just bizarre. A mental illness.

     •  Reply
  2. Comic thumb 9 3 2011 larger
    JLG Premium Member over 6 years ago

    Wait…what?

    I can’t even tell what the joke here is supposed to be. We’re already watching this storyline rooted in a completely baseless premise, and now I don’t even know what’s being mocked here. As near as I can figure, Carmen is acting like it’s simply an article of faith, an unquestioned inevitability, that Clinton will run again, which is being held up as a contrast to what apparently is meant to be Winslow’s…denial?….of that inevitability? Which translates as a rejection of…facts? What?

    This is completely incoherent.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    gammaguy  over 6 years ago

    @charliefarmrhere: “Roswell—The first case of illegal Aliens being locked up, And still are!”

    No, it’s more complex than that. Still trying to decide whether they’re truly “illegal”, since they got here without crossing a “border”.

    Like those in Guantanamo, it’s necessary to keep them imprisoned until the government figures out whether there’s something “criminal” they can be charged with.

    Carmen is saying that because in the past (some) losing candidates who won the popular vote but lost the electoral ran again (and won), that’s some sort of natural(?) law which will force Hillary (Hunny Bunny) to run again. Winslow points to two exceptions… two who didn’t run. Carmen says: Yeah, but they didn’t run because they didn’t run, so they don’t count as examples individuals who didn’t run.

    That’s a severe example of antilog-ical thinking.

    And what’s worse is that Scott has Winslow seeming to buy it.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    WestNYC Premium Member over 6 years ago

    Grover Cleveland’s comeback in 1892 does not set a historical precedence since it has occurred only one time, as described in the circumstances of today’s toon.

     •  Reply
  5. Zombie keith
    streetbeater  over 6 years ago

    “That’s because neither of them ran.” And neither will Hillary. Even if I’m wrong there will be plenty of time to lampoon her when she does. Let’s move on.

     •  Reply
  6. Icon right
    57-Don  over 6 years ago

    Gonna say it again, show me one credible source where Hillary says she is thinking of running again

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    comicsboi Premium Member over 6 years ago

    Stantis appears to be goading Clinton to run again with his blah blah blah “won four years later”.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Prickly City