Coming Soon š At the beginning of April, youāll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
I have a volume of an old ākonversationslexiconā (encyclopedia) nr 2 Armenien-Belger from 1920-something at my bedside. I read a few articles every night before sleeping. Sometimes I google something interesting from it, but find nothing. The thing about printed works vs web works is that print cannot be changed. Old encyclopedias and such show us an old world. In Armenien-Belger āavantgardeā is a purely military term.
When my students whine about having to have three sources for a speech, I tell them how many weeks I spent in the library researching my masterās thesis. How I had to write notes because I couldnāt afford to make copies. And since they can sit in their house in their pajamas eating snacks (when we werenāt allowed to have even a drink in the library), their whines fall on deaf ears. Of course, they look at me like Iām prehistoric.
Nerwin must have a very slow connection if it took him 10 seconds. Just as a test I tried it and got 10 results (including Wikipedia and 3 news items) plus 7 suggestions ārelated to your searchā. In 3 seconds!
Of course, using a printed encyclopedia for a report on the solar system is a bad idea. Scientific consensus (e.g. about what Pluto should be called) has changed since they stopped publishing encyclopedias in printed form.
And given the age of Broomieās books, you need to make sure it isnāt still listing Ceres, Juno, Pallas and Vesta as planets. :-)
We have a 1971 World Book and a 1903 Book of Knowledge. Both of them are absolutely invaluable to me. When I was a kid, my parents could get me out of their hair for hours by sending me to look up something in the encyclopedia, as I would wander from one thing to another. The BofK was one of the first purchases my great-grandparents made when they arrived in America, so their children would have a good education. Some of the historic events it describes are virtually eye-witnesses.
Besides, if you want to hold something down ā or up ā a couple of volumes will do the job more effectively than a stack of CDs, and a LOT better than sitting your monitor on the floor!
Itās also easier for the teacher to check for plagiarizing. All they have to do is type in a few of the key paragraphs in your report and do a search.
Nice try, Auntie Broom. When was the last time you cracked that 20+ volume encyclopedia? Technological advances will have their value (though Iām not sure how thorough or trustworthy Nerwinās online research was)ā¦.
marilynnbyerly about 4 years ago
Cutting and pasting from Wikipedia isnāt a research paper, Nerwin.
rekam about 4 years ago
I remember all the times I spent in the public library. Sheesh, that was one heck of a long time ago.
bunwarpgazoo Premium Member about 4 years ago
I have a volume of an old ākonversationslexiconā (encyclopedia) nr 2 Armenien-Belger from 1920-something at my bedside. I read a few articles every night before sleeping. Sometimes I google something interesting from it, but find nothing. The thing about printed works vs web works is that print cannot be changed. Old encyclopedias and such show us an old world. In Armenien-Belger āavantgardeā is a purely military term.
Rabbit Brown 2105-30 P coat about 4 years ago
Freemasons are attracted to the number 322ā¦ hmmmmm.
Deezlebird about 4 years ago
When my students whine about having to have three sources for a speech, I tell them how many weeks I spent in the library researching my masterās thesis. How I had to write notes because I couldnāt afford to make copies. And since they can sit in their house in their pajamas eating snacks (when we werenāt allowed to have even a drink in the library), their whines fall on deaf ears. Of course, they look at me like Iām prehistoric.
tripwire45 about 4 years ago
That would have been a fun assignment for me.
Yakety Sax about 4 years ago
Nerwin must have a very slow connection if it took him 10 seconds. Just as a test I tried it and got 10 results (including Wikipedia and 3 news items) plus 7 suggestions ārelated to your searchā. In 3 seconds!
shamino about 4 years ago
Of course, using a printed encyclopedia for a report on the solar system is a bad idea. Scientific consensus (e.g. about what Pluto should be called) has changed since they stopped publishing encyclopedias in printed form.
And given the age of Broomieās books, you need to make sure it isnāt still listing Ceres, Juno, Pallas and Vesta as planets. :-)
sergioandrade Premium Member about 4 years ago
I have an early 1960ās encyclopedia which among things states that humans have 47 chromoses and described Hinduism as āan animalist religionā.
Dani Rice about 4 years ago
We have a 1971 World Book and a 1903 Book of Knowledge. Both of them are absolutely invaluable to me. When I was a kid, my parents could get me out of their hair for hours by sending me to look up something in the encyclopedia, as I would wander from one thing to another. The BofK was one of the first purchases my great-grandparents made when they arrived in America, so their children would have a good education. Some of the historic events it describes are virtually eye-witnesses.
Besides, if you want to hold something down ā or up ā a couple of volumes will do the job more effectively than a stack of CDs, and a LOT better than sitting your monitor on the floor!
felipenollaFFA about 4 years ago
Those banana company laptops are awesomeā¦
cuzinron47 about 4 years ago
Well they still make pretty door stops.
oldlady07 Premium Member about 4 years ago
Great way to get the kid going on his homework.
GiantShetlandPony about 4 years ago
Itās also easier for the teacher to check for plagiarizing. All they have to do is type in a few of the key paragraphs in your report and do a search.
WentBrown about 4 years ago
Wowā¦ā¦ā¦..
Sisyphos about 4 years ago
Nice try, Auntie Broom. When was the last time you cracked that 20+ volume encyclopedia? Technological advances will have their value (though Iām not sure how thorough or trustworthy Nerwinās online research was)ā¦.