Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
And weâre not falling behind the rest of the world, only the rest of the industrialized nations. Weâre still waaaaaaay ahead of Zimbabwe and Bangladesh ⊠for now.
Using an antiquated system of measurements is not the main problem. The educational approach to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) is the main problem.(Science education is one of my issues; I give free science demonstrations in schools.)
Hereâs a comment from Europe. From The Netherlands, in fact. Thatâs the tiny speck of mud around Amsterdam. Our country is so tiny that we have to know what happens in the rest of the world, because if we take one wrong turn on the freeway, we ARE in another country.
EVERY country thinks their educational system is falling behind the rest of the world. Okay, maybe France doesnât⊠but France is more âmegalomaniacally nationalisticâ than âdevelopedâ. But we think weâre falling behind the USA, England thinks theyâre falling behind us,
I think weâre doing pretty much ok. I think the US is doing pretty much ok as well. True talent still comes out on top here, There are many countries where true talent is stifled⊠and THEN youâre in trouble.
teaching condom use? not in America, the Right wing would flip out if they couldnât control, deny or perver the sexual behavior of Americans. what country do they even talk about sex as part of human behavior, much less encourage use of condoms. as someone i heard say. Australia got the convicts, America got the perverts/Puritans.
here violence is approved and sex is not. Southern Baptists/aka the Southâs religion, would probably approves of burkas. the religious nuts here make the Muslim fundies look like left wing activists. lol
the glorification of sports/celebrities shows how little we value intelligence/education here. the Bread and Circus attitude of keeping the hoi polloi âdiverted/busyâ automatically leads to and requires a dumbed down populace. and that we have.in spades.sports year round to keep us âfocusedâ so we wonât ask why the country is owned by Inc., Co.
Football, Basketball, Golf ,Baseball, etc.., the list of sports we taxpayers pay for, not the owners. the Team owners, who are subsidized by the taxpayer. very few sports arenât money making tax payer supported businesses. your local stadium/arena is tax payer paid for, yet the private sectors get the profits.
now donât we have fun!!! we get what we pay the Owners for, too! Isnât America great!!
All of the comments here demonstrate that the problem is complex, and everyone is seeing parts of it. The sad problem is, only the educated people who are not influenced by ones with large amounts of money, power, or desires can see the problem and are helpless to actually fix the problem.
The speaker is either a typical stupid politician or the cto of some school publisher cashing in on a lucrative educational system he that he profits from. Promoting irrelevance.
you people are all right! letâs go back to England in charge then we would be under the metric system have a queen an our education system would be better organized.
The necessity of a college degree is pushed primarily by the colleges themselves (and by college loan agencies). Look at unemployment and debt among licensed plumbers and electricians versus Creative Writing graduates.
When political extremists insist on superstition and pseudo-science be taught in schools as REAL science, plus make believing it part of their political purity test the nation has no place to go but down. Weâll lose an entire generation (or more) of children to this nonsense âscienceâ. America is GREATLY weakened by this foolishness. Itâs an attack on truth
My daughter graduated 5th in her class of over 500. She also received an International Baccalaureate diploma. She is in the Honorâs program at her University and is getting a Masterâs degree in Environmental Engineering and a Bachelors degree in Chemical Engineering.
It takes three things to get an education. The schools and teachers are only one part of it. It also takes the parents and the students doing their part.
A lot of comments for a cartoon that seems completely off base. We have huge numbers of people enrolled in higher education, a large proportion of whom presumably graduate. If we are falling behind itâs not for lack of warm bodies in the seats. Far too many people are taking up space who are not prepared to do the work, or are in trivial programs, or are in programs which have been fluffed up to require four year or even graduate degrees. Social workers and journalists as two of many possible examples for the last. I think the personal pay of teachers in public ed is just fine,and professorial pay is also fine. Itâs their working conditions that need looking at. Iâm certainly sympathetic to the plights of adjuncts who find themselves given poor pay to deal with the people who shouldnât even be there. If the government returned to giving loans only to students in programs which were of likely benefit to both student and society, there would be a lot of empty seats but we would all be better off. (Nothing in the world stops you from paying your own way in academic areas that have limited economic utility.)
dennis17 really nailed it on the trivial degrees or fluffed up programs that could be finished in 2 years. A lot of colleges have sold out the students just to make more money. So many people getting degrees that the job market just doesnât want.
They were the only ones who could AFFORD to go. Lets toss billions at the rest of the world but MOM and DAD you have to go into debt for a thousand years so JUNIOR can go to college. To get a job.Fry cook at McDonalds.Part time.And still pay for his/her medical.Remember all the DOT.COMS companies?Big BADA BOOM. Big BOOM.
I realise that Wiley had to depict the problem visually, but the issue isnât so much lack of grads as those grads having received a poor education. There are people with degrees who think the earth is 6,000 years old. Clearly, they were not educated despite having graduated.
Children think in the present, they have to be taught delayed gratification. If children are not rewarded with something they can relate to, they will not do well in school. The parents have to get involved and also have to be (at least) a rooting section. Parents that show their children that they do not care(even when they do) cause them to just quit.
Not teaching condom usage will assure a new generation of poor children as well as parents who need chemical help. Birth control does not equate with socialism.
20 years ago my brother lived in England. He said you had to have a college degree to work at McDonalds. A McJob is basically responding to flashing lights.
The truth is that some things do need improvement (class size, teacher training and especially pay, teaching materials, but bullying is a problem that almost always has roots in the private sector so thereâs jack schools can do off grounds) but I can speak from experience that many teachers do their best to help kids. My own practically bent over backwards to help me make up for half a missing English credit that would have prevented me from graduating with my class. Donât complain when your paycheck has deductions for public education taxes; thatâs money going towards the people and institutions who are helping shape our future.
.@DukedougSadly, I have to agree about the quality of graduates. If those are the future, Iâm glad my doctors donât expect me to live past 40. Eight more years and Iâm out!
As for why I nearly didnât graduate, itâs not because Iâm dumb. I have Aspergerâs, which includes a learning disability and extreme clinical depression, that wasnât diagnosed in time. I was too busy just trying to make it through the day without knowing what the hell was wrong, and not slitting my wrists, to care about homework.
Youâre seriously blaming scientists for the fact that no one has built the fictional John Galt static electricity engine? Is it also the fault of scientists that no one has created a perpetual motion machine, a time machine or a faster-than-light drive? Maybe we should consider the idea that the engine Ayn Rand imagined isnât practically viable and is possibly even impossible. Rand had to conjure up that imaginary engine in order for her silly bookâs heroes to win in the end. It was no different than the heroes of a swords and sorcery book finding the magic orb that gives them a final victory.
People are going to continue to work on wild ideas like the static electricity engine, regardless of what anyone teaches them. Occasionally, someone will make one those things work, but in most cases theyâll fail because what theyâre trying to do is as unfeasible as the scientists say they are. Thereâs a big gap between a defeatist attitude and a practical one.
The idea of using energy to make energy is not outlandish. Look at Formula 1 racing. They use the engine to charge a booster that can give (I think) 100 plus HP when called upon. It only last a few seconds but can really kick up the speed for passing and such. Called ERS. It stores energy to be released by a button on the wheel to boost the HP of the vehicle. There was a 8 wheel electric car built in Asia (I think Japan) that did over 200 mph closed course and used the energy of wheels turning to help keep the batteries up. So it is not far fetched just tremendously expensive at the present.I remember years ago an inventor made a vehicle that used a one cylinder engine to power up a hydraulic pressure system. You would ease the pressure on to operate the gears and such to make the car go. Big Auto and Gas bought up the patent so we would never see it.Trains use the braking effect to make energy to stop the train. No brakes involved on the engine all electric motor only. The more they apply energy to reverse the rotation of the rotor the more energy it puts out to be used. But look at the size of the thing. It is bigger than most cars.But it is the rules that get into effect. The energy in or out NEVER equals the original energy. There is always a loss somewhere as it is changed becoming something different so going back you have to ADD what was lost to begin with. Even Einstein had loss in his Relativity Theory. He dismissed it as an error but in fact there is a loss converting one to the other. Matter to energy and back will always result in some kind of loss. Maybe just molecular but it will occur.
Wow. Thatâs really⊠amusing. Congratulations. But it might be a bit subtle for most readers..The Galt motor (as far as it was explained) supposedly made use of atmospheric static electricity. And it was in a work of fiction.Thomas Friedman didnât write anything like what you describe.And thermodynamics is real.
As a data analyst at a school district, let me tell you what our teachers think is the #1 way to improve education. Vastly reduce regulations. Doing so would eliminate my job and many others at central admin. It would also reduce teacher work time by a substantial amount each day and permit teachers to vary their approach to suit their own teaching style and students. Of course, it would be impossible to accurately identify either teacher or school performance without all the data accumulation. However, it might be worth it.
All math and science in sane public school systems is done using SI (metric) units, though some conversion is taught for those running into old plans or diagrams using English units.
I learned the Metric system in Junior High in the early 1970âs. Heck I think in the metric system as a result of all the engineering classes in College. But I can also think in the standard system and do rough conversions in my head.
Weâd do a bit better with out math scores though if we taught dimensional analysis in High School basic science classes. Almost all errors in âmemorizedâ formulas can be eliminating by checking the formula to insure dimensions match those of the expected answer. (e.g. results in feet per seconds squared, acceleration, versus results in feet per second, speed, in an equation).
rayannina almost 12 years ago
And weâre not falling behind the rest of the world, only the rest of the industrialized nations. Weâre still waaaaaaay ahead of Zimbabwe and Bangladesh ⊠for now.
Varnes almost 12 years ago
You guys go ahead, weâll be behind you all the wayâŠâŠ
Linux0s almost 12 years ago
But weâre still #1 in silly cat videos.
Varnes almost 12 years ago
Linux0s, and snack food technologyâŠ
Randy B Premium Member almost 12 years ago
Using an antiquated system of measurements is not the main problem. The educational approach to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) is the main problem.(Science education is one of my issues; I give free science demonstrations in schools.)
Brass Orchid Premium Member almost 12 years ago
We are number on in teaching condom usage and socialism! USA! USA! USA!
Peabody-Martini almost 12 years ago
Weâre great at producing students who are very talented at filling in circles on standardized tests.
locuravamp almost 12 years ago
Letâs start by lowering class size, huh?!
peter almost 12 years ago
Hereâs a comment from Europe. From The Netherlands, in fact. Thatâs the tiny speck of mud around Amsterdam. Our country is so tiny that we have to know what happens in the rest of the world, because if we take one wrong turn on the freeway, we ARE in another country.
EVERY country thinks their educational system is falling behind the rest of the world. Okay, maybe France doesnât⊠but France is more âmegalomaniacally nationalisticâ than âdevelopedâ. But we think weâre falling behind the USA, England thinks theyâre falling behind us,
I think weâre doing pretty much ok. I think the US is doing pretty much ok as well. True talent still comes out on top here, There are many countries where true talent is stifled⊠and THEN youâre in trouble.
jreckard almost 12 years ago
Pompous and circumstantial
Aussie Down Under almost 12 years ago
I didnât know this strip was about Oz education.
J Short almost 12 years ago
Our Asian students are smarter than your Asian students.
tripwire45 almost 12 years ago
Oh, plenty of kids graduate, but what do they really learn?
Q4horse almost 12 years ago
When you can access all the worlds knowledge on your hand held device, why do you need a formal education?
Beleck3 almost 12 years ago
the illusion of educaiton in America, got to love how easily Americans are led. almost makes me proud to be an American, almost. lol
Beleck3 almost 12 years ago
teaching condom use? not in America, the Right wing would flip out if they couldnât control, deny or perver the sexual behavior of Americans. what country do they even talk about sex as part of human behavior, much less encourage use of condoms. as someone i heard say. Australia got the convicts, America got the perverts/Puritans.
here violence is approved and sex is not. Southern Baptists/aka the Southâs religion, would probably approves of burkas. the religious nuts here make the Muslim fundies look like left wing activists. lol
Beleck3 almost 12 years ago
the glorification of sports/celebrities shows how little we value intelligence/education here. the Bread and Circus attitude of keeping the hoi polloi âdiverted/busyâ automatically leads to and requires a dumbed down populace. and that we have.in spades.sports year round to keep us âfocusedâ so we wonât ask why the country is owned by Inc., Co.
Football, Basketball, Golf ,Baseball, etc.., the list of sports we taxpayers pay for, not the owners. the Team owners, who are subsidized by the taxpayer. very few sports arenât money making tax payer supported businesses. your local stadium/arena is tax payer paid for, yet the private sectors get the profits.
now donât we have fun!!! we get what we pay the Owners for, too! Isnât America great!!
Wiley creator almost 12 years ago
Yes, thatâs the point of cartoon. Itâs called satire.
kantuck-nadie almost 12 years ago
All of the comments here demonstrate that the problem is complex, and everyone is seeing parts of it. The sad problem is, only the educated people who are not influenced by ones with large amounts of money, power, or desires can see the problem and are helpless to actually fix the problem.
dabugger almost 12 years ago
The speaker is either a typical stupid politician or the cto of some school publisher cashing in on a lucrative educational system he that he profits from. Promoting irrelevance.
tlynnch almost 12 years ago
ritafirefly almost 12 years ago
you people are all right! letâs go back to England in charge then we would be under the metric system have a queen an our education system would be better organized.
daveoverpar almost 12 years ago
And these graduates are the ones that were socially promoted. Social promotion, brought to you by those feel good liberals.
daveoverpar almost 12 years ago
No, they are kept stupid by the teacherâs union so they will vote for Democrats.
fogey almost 12 years ago
The necessity of a college degree is pushed primarily by the colleges themselves (and by college loan agencies). Look at unemployment and debt among licensed plumbers and electricians versus Creative Writing graduates.
Rickapolis almost 12 years ago
When political extremists insist on superstition and pseudo-science be taught in schools as REAL science, plus make believing it part of their political purity test the nation has no place to go but down. Weâll lose an entire generation (or more) of children to this nonsense âscienceâ. America is GREATLY weakened by this foolishness. Itâs an attack on truth
daveoverpar almost 12 years ago
Never lived there.
BloomCo almost 12 years ago
My daughter graduated 5th in her class of over 500. She also received an International Baccalaureate diploma. She is in the Honorâs program at her University and is getting a Masterâs degree in Environmental Engineering and a Bachelors degree in Chemical Engineering.
It takes three things to get an education. The schools and teachers are only one part of it. It also takes the parents and the students doing their part.
dennis17 almost 12 years ago
A lot of comments for a cartoon that seems completely off base. We have huge numbers of people enrolled in higher education, a large proportion of whom presumably graduate. If we are falling behind itâs not for lack of warm bodies in the seats. Far too many people are taking up space who are not prepared to do the work, or are in trivial programs, or are in programs which have been fluffed up to require four year or even graduate degrees. Social workers and journalists as two of many possible examples for the last. I think the personal pay of teachers in public ed is just fine,and professorial pay is also fine. Itâs their working conditions that need looking at. Iâm certainly sympathetic to the plights of adjuncts who find themselves given poor pay to deal with the people who shouldnât even be there. If the government returned to giving loans only to students in programs which were of likely benefit to both student and society, there would be a lot of empty seats but we would all be better off. (Nothing in the world stops you from paying your own way in academic areas that have limited economic utility.)
BeniHanna6 Premium Member almost 12 years ago
dennis17 really nailed it on the trivial degrees or fluffed up programs that could be finished in 2 years. A lot of colleges have sold out the students just to make more money. So many people getting degrees that the job market just doesnât want.
Vet Premium Member almost 12 years ago
They were the only ones who could AFFORD to go. Lets toss billions at the rest of the world but MOM and DAD you have to go into debt for a thousand years so JUNIOR can go to college. To get a job.Fry cook at McDonalds.Part time.And still pay for his/her medical.Remember all the DOT.COMS companies?Big BADA BOOM. Big BOOM.
DavidGBA almost 12 years ago
World always falling behind itself, kids!
rowena28 Premium Member almost 12 years ago
I realise that Wiley had to depict the problem visually, but the issue isnât so much lack of grads as those grads having received a poor education. There are people with degrees who think the earth is 6,000 years old. Clearly, they were not educated despite having graduated.
Justice22 almost 12 years ago
Maybe the rest of them couldnât get off work at McDDDDDâs.
route66paul almost 12 years ago
Children think in the present, they have to be taught delayed gratification. If children are not rewarded with something they can relate to, they will not do well in school. The parents have to get involved and also have to be (at least) a rooting section. Parents that show their children that they do not care(even when they do) cause them to just quit.
route66paul almost 12 years ago
Not teaching condom usage will assure a new generation of poor children as well as parents who need chemical help. Birth control does not equate with socialism.
bopard almost 12 years ago
20 years ago my brother lived in England. He said you had to have a college degree to work at McDonalds. A McJob is basically responding to flashing lights.
Fuzzy Thinker Premium Member almost 12 years ago
Public Education is a failure.Parents need the freedom to choose the school their child goes to.
Ernest Lemmingway almost 12 years ago
The truth is that some things do need improvement (class size, teacher training and especially pay, teaching materials, but bullying is a problem that almost always has roots in the private sector so thereâs jack schools can do off grounds) but I can speak from experience that many teachers do their best to help kids. My own practically bent over backwards to help me make up for half a missing English credit that would have prevented me from graduating with my class. Donât complain when your paycheck has deductions for public education taxes; thatâs money going towards the people and institutions who are helping shape our future.
.@DukedougSadly, I have to agree about the quality of graduates. If those are the future, Iâm glad my doctors donât expect me to live past 40. Eight more years and Iâm out!
Ernest Lemmingway almost 12 years ago
As for why I nearly didnât graduate, itâs not because Iâm dumb. I have Aspergerâs, which includes a learning disability and extreme clinical depression, that wasnât diagnosed in time. I was too busy just trying to make it through the day without knowing what the hell was wrong, and not slitting my wrists, to care about homework.
BillJ-MN almost 12 years ago
Youâre seriously blaming scientists for the fact that no one has built the fictional John Galt static electricity engine? Is it also the fault of scientists that no one has created a perpetual motion machine, a time machine or a faster-than-light drive? Maybe we should consider the idea that the engine Ayn Rand imagined isnât practically viable and is possibly even impossible. Rand had to conjure up that imaginary engine in order for her silly bookâs heroes to win in the end. It was no different than the heroes of a swords and sorcery book finding the magic orb that gives them a final victory.
People are going to continue to work on wild ideas like the static electricity engine, regardless of what anyone teaches them. Occasionally, someone will make one those things work, but in most cases theyâll fail because what theyâre trying to do is as unfeasible as the scientists say they are. Thereâs a big gap between a defeatist attitude and a practical one.
Vet Premium Member almost 12 years ago
The idea of using energy to make energy is not outlandish. Look at Formula 1 racing. They use the engine to charge a booster that can give (I think) 100 plus HP when called upon. It only last a few seconds but can really kick up the speed for passing and such. Called ERS. It stores energy to be released by a button on the wheel to boost the HP of the vehicle. There was a 8 wheel electric car built in Asia (I think Japan) that did over 200 mph closed course and used the energy of wheels turning to help keep the batteries up. So it is not far fetched just tremendously expensive at the present.I remember years ago an inventor made a vehicle that used a one cylinder engine to power up a hydraulic pressure system. You would ease the pressure on to operate the gears and such to make the car go. Big Auto and Gas bought up the patent so we would never see it.Trains use the braking effect to make energy to stop the train. No brakes involved on the engine all electric motor only. The more they apply energy to reverse the rotation of the rotor the more energy it puts out to be used. But look at the size of the thing. It is bigger than most cars.But it is the rules that get into effect. The energy in or out NEVER equals the original energy. There is always a loss somewhere as it is changed becoming something different so going back you have to ADD what was lost to begin with. Even Einstein had loss in his Relativity Theory. He dismissed it as an error but in fact there is a loss converting one to the other. Matter to energy and back will always result in some kind of loss. Maybe just molecular but it will occur.
Tyrnn almost 12 years ago
I started college with over a hundred people in my freshman class. 37 of us graduated last year.
Randy B Premium Member almost 12 years ago
Wow. Thatâs really⊠amusing. Congratulations. But it might be a bit subtle for most readers..The Galt motor (as far as it was explained) supposedly made use of atmospheric static electricity. And it was in a work of fiction.Thomas Friedman didnât write anything like what you describe.And thermodynamics is real.
peter almost 12 years ago
@Michael_wmeâYou stupid science teachers MUST learn that NOTHING is impossible for American ingenuityâ
Thanks, I needed a laugh.So⊠American ingenuity supercedes reality? That would actually explain a lot.
jbarnes almost 12 years ago
As a data analyst at a school district, let me tell you what our teachers think is the #1 way to improve education. Vastly reduce regulations. Doing so would eliminate my job and many others at central admin. It would also reduce teacher work time by a substantial amount each day and permit teachers to vary their approach to suit their own teaching style and students. Of course, it would be impossible to accurately identify either teacher or school performance without all the data accumulation. However, it might be worth it.
caligula almost 12 years ago
All math and science in sane public school systems is done using SI (metric) units, though some conversion is taught for those running into old plans or diagrams using English units.
I learned the Metric system in Junior High in the early 1970âs. Heck I think in the metric system as a result of all the engineering classes in College. But I can also think in the standard system and do rough conversions in my head.
Weâd do a bit better with out math scores though if we taught dimensional analysis in High School basic science classes. Almost all errors in âmemorizedâ formulas can be eliminating by checking the formula to insure dimensions match those of the expected answer. (e.g. results in feet per seconds squared, acceleration, versus results in feet per second, speed, in an equation).