For Better or For Worse by Lynn Johnston for August 11, 2014

  1. Mouse5
    ORMouseworks  about 10 years ago

    John…not exactly what you should have said… ;)

     •  Reply
  2. B986e866 14d0 4607 bdb4 5d76d7b56ddb
    Templo S.U.D.  about 10 years ago

    Years down the line, he’ll have a third. Then we’ll see who gets the last laugh.

     •  Reply
  3. We the people
    ILuvLu  about 10 years ago

    El’s expression is way too severe for today’s punchline.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Observer fo Irony  about 10 years ago

    I always thought a babe is not cute until they are 16 and pack an attitude.

     •  Reply
  5. Cathyfacepalm
    gobblingup Premium Member about 10 years ago

    That was a bit creepy, although the same could be said of a boy baby. Too bad that wasn’t the case.

     •  Reply
  6. 1682106 inline inline 2 mel brooks master
    Can't Sleep  about 10 years ago

    Whoa. I didn’t know Elly could shoot death rays from her eyes.

     •  Reply
  7. Gustave courbet   le d sesp r
    mabrndt Premium Member about 10 years ago

    You’re right, it does have sixteen in the final panel instead (better explains Elly’s expression in that panel). No Lynn’s Notes today though.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    hippogriff  about 10 years ago

    Night-Gaunt49: I don’t remember the exact citation, but several years ago, Scientific American had a cover story on the functions of neotany.

     •  Reply
  9. Avatar alberto
    albertonencioni  about 10 years ago

    Oh stop with this vanilla bigotism!A 16 years girl may be, and often is, a memorable babe, she knows she is and she enjoys being such, and all her girl friends agonise in envy. There are dozen of teen models on very reputable fashion magazines, and they are there to be drooled after, not because they impersonate innocence or poetry or any moral value. Then, if the LOCAL law says “stay away” you stay away, of course, but that’s another thing, nothing to do with looks or hormones.I remind you that Juliet Capuleti jumped over Romeo (SHE took the initiative, remember?) when she was barely FOURTEEN.In this strip the caption was changed probably on lawyers’ advice to avoid trouble from readers that look always and only for “THAT thing” in every expression of human behavior from cartoons to Disney movies to biscuits ads.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    EnglishProf  about 10 years ago

    Alberto, in Shakespeare’s time, a fourteen year old was much “older” than today (Juliet wasn’t quite thirteen, by the way), so it wasn’t creepy as it would be in a modern day play. I think today’s strip would have worked had the original “sixteen” been edited to “eighteen” or even “twenty-one” rather than the generic “older.” P.S. I thought “sixteen” was yucky when I read it in1985.

     •  Reply
  11. Lucy2
    IQTech61  about 10 years ago

    Creepy aspect of this strip: She’s not worth paying attention to until she’s old enough to be able to excite me.

    Can you imagine a woman saying that about a male infant? If not, better ask yourself why it is okay for John to say that.

     •  Reply
  12. Boston terrier 7
    LV1951  about 10 years ago

    John should have said “Ask me to describe her when she has teeth!” :)

     •  Reply
  13. Zaphod beeblebrox
    cwizard71  about 10 years ago

    Or perhaps, judging by John’s expression in the last panel, he said what he did (either version of the line) just to get a rise out of Elly. I think he does that rather often.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Doug A4  about 10 years ago

    The expression on Ellie’s face is priceless!! So well drawn, as usual, Lynn.Doug

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From For Better or For Worse