B.C. by Mastroianni and Hart for August 06, 2015

You were never really committed.She finally saw a better opportunity.

If she wants an open relationship after 3 years, it’s his fault for not closing the deal.

“Live-in girlfriend”? Dang, that makes Miss Know-it-All seem absolutely anemic! :-P

What’s he doing with a 3-year-old girlfriend?! Oh wait, I get it …

Live together for three years, develop all kinds of obligations and no kind of commitment. Sad

Dear Angry – Your girlfriend already has one.

A hard working man gets home from work… his girlfriend is packing all her stuff. He said honey ! what’s the matter, we didn’t even have a argument ? " someone told me you were a pedophilia " He says “That’s a pretty big word for a 8 year old”

The Clam says, “CAVES HAVE DOORS”

Women don’t come here to find a husband … they come here to find single men that they can turn into husbands.

Don’t let the door hit yawhere the good Lord split ya.

-Randy Rhodes (and probably many before her)

What this really means is that she wants to continue to live there but not with him.

Some states used to have common law marriages, ie live together for one year and you were considered married.

A doctor friend of mine just finished with a divorce from his wife of close to 15 years. He looked at me and said she told him she really liked being married… but apparently not to me!

The split was bad enough, but the $8,000 monthly alimony was, according to his attorney, a good deal!

@Jim Kerner@DavidHuieGreen“I think it would be called, Palimony. See Lee Marvin v. Michele Triola. They were living together as well.”.Except that trial established there was no contract and Lee was not obligated because of that.Per my buddy, Wiki:Lee Marvin v. Michele Triola“On April 18, 1979, Judge Arthur K. Marshall ordered Marvin to pay $104,000 to Triola for “rehabilitation purposes”, but denied her community property claim for one-half of the $3.6 million which Marvin had earned during their six years of cohabitation. Both sides claimed victory, but in August 1981, the California Court of Appeal ruled that Triola could not show any contract between she (that should be “her”, dhg) and Marvin to justify any payment to her. As a result, Triola received no money from Marvin.

I am closing in on 45 years marriage with my only wife! I think I will keep her for a while…

when you’re in love with a beautiful woman, its hard