Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for November 05, 2015
Transcript:
Man in purple: I read an article on the internet that said studies show the real cause of global warming. Man in blue: Man made? Man in purple: Yeah, but not the way previously thought. Apparently, it's due to gas emissions coming from too many boys in the world. Man in blue: Wait...what studies? Man in purple: Didn't say, but I guess it was well-researched. Man in blue: Oh...ok. Good enough for me. Lucy: You were born for this era. Danae: Thanks! Lucy: That wasn't a compliment. Sign on table reads: Studies "R" US
Argythree over 9 years ago
This era is no different from any other. People always defer to âexpertsâ. These days, the âexpertsâ are on the internet. Back in the day, they drove around with a horse and buggy and peddled instant cure-allsâŠ
Bilan over 9 years ago
Danae is the product of thousands of year of human development.Urp.
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
Humans have generally been advancing for some 200,000 years, generally speaking that is, some are still in denial of science and facts, itâs called a regression.
Meh~tdology, fka Pepelaputr over 9 years ago
If itâs on the internet it MUST be true!
Artistinfo over 9 years ago
Climate change is real.
nosirrom over 9 years ago
Finally! the true reason for global warming â BBBBBooger Boyâs Bottom Burps!
Reppr Premium Member over 9 years ago
If the data doesnât fit the theory, fudge the data. Thatâs the scientific method, right? "See? I told you it was âsettled scienceâ
tripwire45 over 9 years ago
People will believe anything.
dadoctah over 9 years ago
I seem to recall that Reagan thought pollution was caused by trees.
pelican47 over 9 years ago
If you donât watch out which websites you open, your device may experience its own global âwormingâ or worse.
Carl Premium Member over 9 years ago
I thought global warming was caused by studies of global warming.
whiteheron over 9 years ago
My facts are factier than your facts.
The Old Wolf over 9 years ago
Yes indeed, there is a cabal of hundreds of thousands of scientists in the world who have banded together in a global secret combination to dupe 7 billion world citizens, all in the name of getting published and scaring up a grant or two. Yes, yes, it all makes sense now.
GROG Premium Member over 9 years ago
I donât believe anything I read on the internet.
1953Baby over 9 years ago
Go, Danae!@The Old Wolf: Thanks! Iâm co-opting your answer as my standard when confronted with climate-change deniers.
BTW, I live in Florida and our governor has forbidden all state government workers from using the term âclimate change.â However the mayor/city commissioners of the âsmallâ southeastern communitiesâwhich include Miamiâhave been and are working with all kinds of planners to alleviate/prepare for the rising seas along the coastlines. One of them was quoted as saying, âDoesnât matter what you call it, or whether you recognize it, itâs here and itâs getting worse.â
Old Texan75 over 9 years ago
Oh, I forgot to mention that Rush Limbaugh is the smartest man in the world. I know them well, from the inside. I donât honestly know how I escaped. When I did, I lost family and friends. But, then again, who needs friends that reality makes them miserable.
paul GROSS Premium Member over 9 years ago
Researched by the same guy who gave us the âhockey stickâ?
felinefan55 Premium Member over 9 years ago
I tried to find this clip on YouTube since Alexikakos taught me how to embed from there, however there are just too many links. Not to mention that lately gocomics hasnât been allowing playable clips. Anyway this is an episode of âThe Daily Showâ from back in 2011. In it Jon talked about the Koch brothers having their own scientist look over the climate data. Jon figured that the guy would just follow the conservative narrative about it being a hoax. However what in fact DID happen was the man discovered climate change to be true. He published an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal.
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/7vmoge/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-weathering-fights
whiteaj over 9 years ago
Finally! I know who âtheyâ are, as in âthey sayâŠâ
dabugger over 9 years ago
So âbooger brain boysâ then; will havta change internet to Danae. . .
Fido (aka Felix Rex) over 9 years ago
All of this discussion (read diatribe) about global warming, pro/anti-science conspiracies, and basic middle-schoolish yadda-yadda-yadda debate is missing the true point of this comic.The real question should be this - why did Danae (Willey) use the standard âRâ in the sign? Shouldnât have been the inverted version seen at the conglomerate toy store the phrase is ripping off? Maybe heâs been intimidated by a powerful copyright lawyer in the past. Or possibly he doesnât want to inflict the Cyrillic alphabet letter âĐŻâ on unsuspecting graphaphobes?Sadly, I doubt we will ever learn the truth.
Ernest Lemmingway over 9 years ago
Sheeple want easy answers to lifeâs complex questions and will blindly latch onto whatever makes sense to them. Danae knows this well.
route66paul over 9 years ago
Cow gas is bad, but the aroma released by the fecal emissions of bulls is also part of the equation.
route66paul over 9 years ago
The reason people came to New England was to worship thier own way and to get away from established denominations. I am sure there were no Catholics there in the 1600s.
Doublejake over 9 years ago
âStudies ârâ Us.â NOW we know where Nabby does his âresearch.â
Maizing over 9 years ago
I know that I would personally find the claim that humans are the cause of climate change to be more believable if:1) It werenât for that pesky leak a few years ago about faked data. Do you really think people will just âforgetâ about that?2) The believers took steps to cut down their personal âcarbon footprintâ instead of expecting everyone else to do it all. âDo as I say, not as I doâ doesnât work on children, and it wonât work on me. To all of you believers out there⊠what have you personally done? Have you even gone so far as to give up your car and switched to public transportation, walking or a bike?2a) The âcarbon creditsâ baloney wasnât an option. If humans are truly the cause of the climate changing, then everyone should do as much as they possibly can and one polluter should not be given a free pass to pollute as much as they want just because someone else is more successful in their efforts at cutting back on the pollution they emit than they had been asked to be. I donât remember polluters being given a similar option back in the 70s when we had a ton more pollution than we do now.3) I hadnât seen convincing evidence that the Earthâs warming trend is actually caused by sun spots. You know, those signs of activity happening on that great ball of fire which resides at the center of our solar system.4) The climate doomsday scenarios were actually coming to pass. After all, Florida was predicted to have mostly washed away/been submerged by 2010.Not to mention that I have seen some of the âsolutionsâ proposed to slow/reverse the warming trend, and frankly, they scare me. I can fully see some of those âsolutionsâ causing more harm than if we were to simply adapt.
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
Danae has succeeded in the âdenierâ mode indeed. Lucy is aware that in much of the world already, the old saying: âWhen your up to your ass in alligators, itâs time to drain the swamp.â, is where weâre already at. That includes contaminated fishing waters and soils on flood plains damaged by rising ocean levels, then thereâs the acidification issue.
Danae has a future in the fossil fuel industry, well and the pharmaceutical industry as well if she chooses.
dflak over 9 years ago
The Internet: proof that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth.
Brass Orchid Premium Member over 9 years ago
Explain again how reducing the Earthâs thermal reserves will increase the amount of fresh water available and thus cause the seas to lower.
einarbt over 9 years ago
No, boys. Donât you read the latest research?