Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for December 30, 2015

  1. Missing large
    Argythree  almost 9 years ago

    So Trip was a Reagan fan…

     •  Reply
  2. Img 20240924 104124950 2
    David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace  almost 9 years ago

    Possibilities surround us if we just open our eyes.

    Of course, it’s fun to seek boogie men and see every problem as a game~stopper, too.

     •  Reply
  3. Airhornmissc
    Liverlips McCracken Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    Save a life, Mike. Get him out of there stat, before he kills ol’ Trip.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    wcorvi  almost 9 years ago

    A young Donald Trump we have here.

     •  Reply
  5. Pirate63
    Linguist  almost 9 years ago

    Trip is the type to transition into a tout for transcendental tourism.

    I can just see him running one of those “Find Your Inner Self and Make Millions in Real Estate” seminars.

     •  Reply
  6. Caddy
    StCleve72  almost 9 years ago

    Thank goodness the current Republicans don’t have a slick con artist like Reagan to charm the unsophisticated while he picks their pockets. T. Rump is the perfect candidate for them; what you see is what you get and let’s have a referendum on whether America is to have a President who suffers from narcissistic personality disorder and represents all that is hideous and regressive in this country, or not. In the meantime Sal, I hope you don’t have the bottom of a bunk bed with young Mr. Tripler: something may trickle down on you.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Flash Gordon  almost 9 years ago

    Young republicans are delusional if they think they couldpossibly ever have more than a few crumbs from the pie.

     •  Reply
  8. Art1c 2
    dre7861  almost 9 years ago

    Trip Tripler is a Reaganite! Run Sal, for all that’s holy, run!

     •  Reply
  9. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  almost 9 years ago

    Maybe Sal should drink more coffee.

     •  Reply
  10. Img 20230721 103439220 hdr
    kaffekup   almost 9 years ago

    What exactly did “flamer” mean in 1985? I was under the impression that it meant pretty much what it means now, but that doesn’t fit the dialogue.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    nathanbtlr  almost 9 years ago

    Thanks to Doonesbury, I was completely clueless as to what “flaming” meant for too many years. I must have unknowingly embarrassed myself scores of times.

     •  Reply
  12. Img 20240924 104124950 2
    David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace  almost 9 years ago

    I loved RWR, all but the quadrupling the national debt part . . . And maybe the IranContra part. But other than that ~

     •  Reply
  13. Img 20240924 104124950 2
    David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace  almost 9 years ago

    Just out of curiosity, how many of the world’s richest were in the top tier back then?

     •  Reply
  14. Caddy
    StCleve72  almost 9 years ago

    By “progs” are you saying: “progressives?” Is that by definition a negative? Isn’t the opposite of that “regressive or backward?” That’s what one thesaurus had as antonyms for progressive. Who are the “us” you allude to? And what do you know about me? I wouldn’t describe myself as liberal or conservative, but rather a pragmatist? Is that a bad thing among the “us” that you’re part of? Please explain. I don’t think that the ever increasing divide in wealth that’s occurred since Reagan and his “supply side (voodoo-per George Bush) economics” is in practical terms a good thing for this country, do you?

     •  Reply
  15. Phoenix
    dawnsfire  almost 9 years ago

    snerk knowing something of these two’s futures…!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury