Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
This will be my last post for the next five weeks. My wife and I are heading to Germany and the Netherlands on holiday.We start with the passion play in Oberammergau and end on a house boat in Amsterdam.
Please count the number of voters who pay less than $100. in income taxes.
We are in debt because voters do not pay income taxes.
Now, I would favor a law to give an extra vote to cast to those who do pay income taxes. They should be the decision makers.
pouncingtiger, that line was old a year and a half ago, find a new one. The fool in the White House now, with his cabal in Congress, has raised the debt more in two years than the last president did in eight.
SKP Tom.V - itâs NOT the voters,not paying taxes ⊠itâs the BUSINESSES not paying taxes on MONEY EARNED (NOT to be confused with profit!).
How many people got their pays CUT because of the new battle cry: âWe MUST reduce hours to decrease Corporate spending and MAXIMIZE the dollar!â, made by people that GOT their raises and bonuses the last 6 years?
Itâs COMPANYâS that donât pay, but reap the tax credits hand over fist - NOT âJoe Blowâ!
We CANâT âBlame Obamaâ for this one ⊠heâs spent LESS time in the White House crapper than Bush - isnât he on Vacation NOW, in some far off country (?) instead of spending it - HERE ??? - !!! - Now, HEâS an âAmerica FIRSTâ kinda guy!
Flag it Bill!
I donât pay income tax because Mr. Bush took my income away, not Obama. At least Iâm not supporting the illegitimates [polite for fish excrement (bass turds) on welfare].
Sarge, you sure can spout the union rhetoric. Unions helped put this nation into debt by demanding more, doing less and sending jobs overseas where labor is cheaper and less âtroublesomeâ. If you want to get paid a bunch to do little join a union in a manufacturing plant. If you want to actually earn your income by working, then the unions in healthcare and mining are for you (if it must be a union job for you). And the union pension demands are pretty outrageous as well. Most union retirees make three or four times the retirement of most hardworking people with jobs (unless they are in those same overpaid manufacturing union jobsâŠwhich are getting in pretty short supply).
âPlease count the number of voters who pay less than $100. in income taxes. â
So ⊠companies with lobbyists such as Exxon who pay $0 in income taxes or like GE get back $1.1 billion in profits FROM income taxes ⊠.
Incidentally individuals (whom I presume you mean are poor, but could mean rich tax evaders) who pay âless than $100â in taxes⊠presuming they do so because of their income, own a small fraction of the countryâs total wealth compared to the number of people in that range.
The new Republican mantra:
Tax cuts for the rich.
Tax increases for the poor.
Uneffingbelievable!
The Republicans love poor people.
Look how many of them their policies created.
Over the past two years, this administration and this Congress have increased spending by nearly 18 percent and run up more debt in two years than the âirresponsibleâ Bush administration did in all of its eight years combined. Meanwhile, in the last two years, unemployment has increased from 7.6 to 9.5 percent. Remember this: businesses donât pay business taxes. Business taxes can only be paid in one of three ways â by us as consumers through higher prices, by us as employees through lower wages, and by us as investors through lower earnings on our 401(k) plans.
@SKP Tom Vâ-Check your history. When the constitution of the United States of America was first ratified, only male landowners with a certain amount of wealth could vote. Iâm not sure that that was right but it was the law at the time. It raises the question, âShould we have voter limitations now?â
Democrats are in such a rush to pass one more stimulus-type bill that the legislation didnât even have a name as of 8/10/2010..
As CNET reported, a watchdog Web site on Sunday evening noted that the Democratsâ $26-billion spending measure includes a few blank spaces.
Congressâ official Web site calls it the âAct of__,â and the Library of Congressâ Thomas Web site displays it as the âXXXXXX Act of XXXX.ââ
A nameless bill for a hopeless cause is a fitting metaphor for a Democratic Congress that refuses to listen to the American people and abandon its job-killing agenda,
House Republican Leader John Boehner on Monday offered 10 possible names for what he called the âunion-boss bailoutâ bill:
â Save Our âStimulusâ (SOS) Act
â âRecovery Summerâ Bailout Act (Cash for Flunkers)
â Delivering Unions a Major Boost (DUMB) Act
â Helping Election Expenditures, Hurting American Workers (HEEHAW) Act
â Democracy is Strengthened by Clearly Leveraging and Optimizing Special-Interestsâ Effectiveness (DISCLOSE) Act
â Holding Union Bosses Over Until Card Check Act
â Rescuing Incumbent Democrats Is Costly (RIDIC) Act
â Summertime Cash for Union Bosses Instead of Spending Cuts for Taxpayers Act
â Frivolous Act of Ineffective Largesse (FAIL) Act
â Naming These Things Hasnât Gotten Us Anywhere, So Why Bother? Act
Itâs not the politicians, itâs not the corporations, itâs not the unions, itâs not the tax code, itâs not Bush or Obama, itâs those pedophile priests and Jew bankers.
Now Iâve moved the comments away from politics and on to religion.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
If you canât see the harm the present administration has done in the past year and a half, but you continue to blame âBushââ you just might be a liberal.
If you think paying out billions of dollars to special interests, raising taxes, and creating an anti-jobs economy will result in lower unemploymentâ you just might be a liberal.
If you think itâs racist to control our borders, racist to speak out against this administration, or racist to do just about anything (as long as youâre not a Democrat, for then you get a free pass)â you just might be a liberal.
so they donât know what to call the next âstimulusâ bill?
How about, âThe Act of One More Strawâ, as in the straw that broke the camelâs back.
It should be referred to as a STEAMulus Bill. Because it reminds me of a big pile of STEAMing sâŠ
I did earn my own living and paid my taxes until my job was outsourced to India two and a half years ago (thank you United Rentals). I have been getting off my âdead bleeepâ looking for work since then. You have the nerve to tell me I donât have the right to vote!!! GO TO HELL!!!!
Let me get this straightâŠ
Obamaâs health care plan was written by a committee
whose head says he doesnât understand it,
passed by a Congress that hadnât read it,
signed by a president who smokes,
funded by a treasury chief who did not pay his taxes,
overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and
financed by a country that is broke.
What could possibly go wrong? (go wrong-go wrong-go wrongâŠ)
Only problem, sarge, is that companies do not end up paying taxes. Every single tax dollar they pay is passed on to the consumer of their goods or services in the price of those goods and services. I argue that a fair tax would be for only corporations and businesses to be taxed so that those who do not use their products or services are NOT taxed and those that do would pay for the actual cost to the company to produce.
@dahawk, then you end up with the government shutting down the kid selling lemonade. Perhaps a standard deductible like for individuals would mitigate this (a business doesnât start to pay tax until revenue exceeds a minimum - say 10000). For the business only tax to work, it would have to be on revenue (gross or net), not profit - it is too easy to adjust profit. Although there are accounting games to alter net revenue, so maybe it should be gross revenue.
pouncingtiger over 14 years ago
Thanks to our last President.
Yukoner over 14 years ago
Land of the free and home of the deep in debt.
This will be my last post for the next five weeks. My wife and I are heading to Germany and the Netherlands on holiday.We start with the passion play in Oberammergau and end on a house boat in Amsterdam.
Fuzzy Thinker Premium Member over 14 years ago
Please count the number of voters who pay less than $100. in income taxes. We are in debt because voters do not pay income taxes. Now, I would favor a law to give an extra vote to cast to those who do pay income taxes. They should be the decision makers.
The Duke 1 over 14 years ago
Morons
pdking77 over 14 years ago
pouncingtiger, that line was old a year and a half ago, find a new one. The fool in the White House now, with his cabal in Congress, has raised the debt more in two years than the last president did in eight.
sarge112751 over 14 years ago
SKP Tom.V - itâs NOT the voters,not paying taxes ⊠itâs the BUSINESSES not paying taxes on MONEY EARNED (NOT to be confused with profit!).
How many people got their pays CUT because of the new battle cry: âWe MUST reduce hours to decrease Corporate spending and MAXIMIZE the dollar!â, made by people that GOT their raises and bonuses the last 6 years?
Itâs COMPANYâS that donât pay, but reap the tax credits hand over fist - NOT âJoe Blowâ!
We CANâT âBlame Obamaâ for this one ⊠heâs spent LESS time in the White House crapper than Bush - isnât he on Vacation NOW, in some far off country (?) instead of spending it - HERE ??? - !!! - Now, HEâS an âAmerica FIRSTâ kinda guy!
Yukoneric over 14 years ago
Flag it Bill! I donât pay income tax because Mr. Bush took my income away, not Obama. At least Iâm not supporting the illegitimates [polite for fish excrement (bass turds) on welfare].
Allison Nunn Premium Member over 14 years ago
Sarge, you sure can spout the union rhetoric. Unions helped put this nation into debt by demanding more, doing less and sending jobs overseas where labor is cheaper and less âtroublesomeâ. If you want to get paid a bunch to do little join a union in a manufacturing plant. If you want to actually earn your income by working, then the unions in healthcare and mining are for you (if it must be a union job for you). And the union pension demands are pretty outrageous as well. Most union retirees make three or four times the retirement of most hardworking people with jobs (unless they are in those same overpaid manufacturing union jobsâŠwhich are getting in pretty short supply).
Jaedabee over 14 years ago
âPlease count the number of voters who pay less than $100. in income taxes. â
So ⊠companies with lobbyists such as Exxon who pay $0 in income taxes or like GE get back $1.1 billion in profits FROM income taxes ⊠. Incidentally individuals (whom I presume you mean are poor, but could mean rich tax evaders) who pay âless than $100â in taxes⊠presuming they do so because of their income, own a small fraction of the countryâs total wealth compared to the number of people in that range.WaitingMan over 14 years ago
The new Republican mantra: Tax cuts for the rich. Tax increases for the poor. Uneffingbelievable! The Republicans love poor people. Look how many of them their policies created.
treBsdrawkcaB over 14 years ago
Over the past two years, this administration and this Congress have increased spending by nearly 18 percent and run up more debt in two years than the âirresponsibleâ Bush administration did in all of its eight years combined. Meanwhile, in the last two years, unemployment has increased from 7.6 to 9.5 percent. Remember this: businesses donât pay business taxes. Business taxes can only be paid in one of three ways â by us as consumers through higher prices, by us as employees through lower wages, and by us as investors through lower earnings on our 401(k) plans.
pawpawbear over 14 years ago
@SKP Tom Vâ-Check your history. When the constitution of the United States of America was first ratified, only male landowners with a certain amount of wealth could vote. Iâm not sure that that was right but it was the law at the time. It raises the question, âShould we have voter limitations now?â
Looking forward to this one.
treBsdrawkcaB over 14 years ago
Democrats are in such a rush to pass one more stimulus-type bill that the legislation didnât even have a name as of 8/10/2010..
As CNET reported, a watchdog Web site on Sunday evening noted that the Democratsâ $26-billion spending measure includes a few blank spaces.
Congressâ official Web site calls it the âAct of__,â and the Library of Congressâ Thomas Web site displays it as the âXXXXXX Act of XXXX.ââ
A nameless bill for a hopeless cause is a fitting metaphor for a Democratic Congress that refuses to listen to the American people and abandon its job-killing agenda,
House Republican Leader John Boehner on Monday offered 10 possible names for what he called the âunion-boss bailoutâ bill:
â Save Our âStimulusâ (SOS) Act â âRecovery Summerâ Bailout Act (Cash for Flunkers) â Delivering Unions a Major Boost (DUMB) Act â Helping Election Expenditures, Hurting American Workers (HEEHAW) Act â Democracy is Strengthened by Clearly Leveraging and Optimizing Special-Interestsâ Effectiveness (DISCLOSE) Act â Holding Union Bosses Over Until Card Check Act â Rescuing Incumbent Democrats Is Costly (RIDIC) Act â Summertime Cash for Union Bosses Instead of Spending Cuts for Taxpayers Act â Frivolous Act of Ineffective Largesse (FAIL) Act â Naming These Things Hasnât Gotten Us Anywhere, So Why Bother? Act
jimpow over 14 years ago
Itâs not the politicians, itâs not the corporations, itâs not the unions, itâs not the tax code, itâs not Bush or Obama, itâs those pedophile priests and Jew bankers.
Now Iâve moved the comments away from politics and on to religion.
Let the divisiveness begin!
worldisacomic over 14 years ago
cured of? Ted âI got away with Chappaquiddickâ Kennedy. Shoe has to now come up with a caricature of Barneys Frank as the corrupt politician!
Frankr over 14 years ago
It is nice to see a healthy debate, but a healthy debate is not advanced by simply calling other posters âslugsâ, RCminor
Frankr over 14 years ago
rickmac1937: What? Cartoon? Oh, the cartoonâŠ
theR0nin over 14 years ago
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
If you canât see the harm the present administration has done in the past year and a half, but you continue to blame âBushââ you just might be a liberal.
If you think paying out billions of dollars to special interests, raising taxes, and creating an anti-jobs economy will result in lower unemploymentâ you just might be a liberal.
If you think itâs racist to control our borders, racist to speak out against this administration, or racist to do just about anything (as long as youâre not a Democrat, for then you get a free pass)â you just might be a liberal.
N.D.Pendent over 14 years ago
so they donât know what to call the next âstimulusâ bill? How about, âThe Act of One More Strawâ, as in the straw that broke the camelâs back. It should be referred to as a STEAMulus Bill. Because it reminds me of a big pile of STEAMing sâŠ
WallyCuppaJoe over 14 years ago
Yukoneric are you traveling on Air Force 2 ?
WaitingMan over 14 years ago
I did earn my own living and paid my taxes until my job was outsourced to India two and a half years ago (thank you United Rentals). I have been getting off my âdead bleeepâ looking for work since then. You have the nerve to tell me I donât have the right to vote!!! GO TO HELL!!!!
jimpow over 14 years ago
Get out of Iraq and Afghanistan â save billions. Those people arenât worth the sweat off my butt.
ububobu over 14 years ago
Let me get this straight⊠Obamaâs health care plan was written by a committee whose head says he doesnât understand it, passed by a Congress that hadnât read it, signed by a president who smokes, funded by a treasury chief who did not pay his taxes, overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that is broke. What could possibly go wrong? (go wrong-go wrong-go wrongâŠ)
William Ellwin Premium Member over 14 years ago
Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative. - John Stuart Mill
dahawk over 14 years ago
Only problem, sarge, is that companies do not end up paying taxes. Every single tax dollar they pay is passed on to the consumer of their goods or services in the price of those goods and services. I argue that a fair tax would be for only corporations and businesses to be taxed so that those who do not use their products or services are NOT taxed and those that do would pay for the actual cost to the company to produce.
esingletary over 14 years ago
If you are twenty years old, and not a liberal; you have no heart.
If you are forty years old, and not a conservative; you have no brain.
Sir Winston Churchillstuart over 14 years ago
@dahawk, then you end up with the government shutting down the kid selling lemonade. Perhaps a standard deductible like for individuals would mitigate this (a business doesnât start to pay tax until revenue exceeds a minimum - say 10000). For the business only tax to work, it would have to be on revenue (gross or net), not profit - it is too easy to adjust profit. Although there are accounting games to alter net revenue, so maybe it should be gross revenue.
tcambeul over 14 years ago
p tiger, thanks to the current muslim in the white house!!!
W6BXQ, John over 14 years ago
Watch it!!! jorer028 is SPAM!!!
Kokopelli over 14 years ago
flag it
wetidlerjr over 14 years ago
âCanât we all just get along ? â
Ha ha ha⊠He he he⊠Ho ho ho hoâŠ
dvoyack over 14 years ago
The past 8 years have showed me that âconservativeâ is as equally a dirty a word as âliberalâ..
RICERAYMO over 14 years ago
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO OUR DAILY SHOE? ALL I HAVE BEEN GETTING IS A PENQUIN SAYING TRY AGAIN IN A LITTLE WHILE.