Without knowing the answer to those math questions, and having read Foxtrot long enough to know how geeky Amend is, I’d say 1000000, which is the binary equivalent of 64
1. 2,808 = (24 * 117 = 2808)2. 431 (has to start with 1, for final answer. therefore, only choices are 134 and 143, and 134 is not prime)3. 4096 (16 cubed is 4096. zero has to be in 2nd position)4. 479,001,600 (just keep multiplying)
Thanks Bill. I liked it. Well, I made short work of the first and third question using a basic calculator. For the second question I pulled up a prime number program I wrote in BASIC in the ‘80s. For the readers, the ONLY permutation of those numbers that is a prime is 431, and that provides the “1” in the answer (which I figured out first). So that meant the final question has zeros in the circles. Back to BASIC for more programming fun… There are actually a bunch of values that are divisible by 12 that have zeros in those places, the lowest being 146007900 (which is 12 × 12167325). That’ll be $1M, please.
Templo S.U.D. almost 8 years ago
okay, math nerds, give me the answers (nice get-rich-quick scheme, Jason… too bad your parents aren’t giving you that amount)
heyitsconnor1236 almost 8 years ago
1. 2,808 2. 431 3. 4096 4. 479,001,600 Answer: 0100000
jamd15 almost 8 years ago
Wrong 1000000
Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo] almost 8 years ago
This is out of my league. I am the opposite of a Math Nerd.
WaitingMan almost 8 years ago
Being a math nerd who has taken courses in organic chemistry, I can say with absolute certainty that the math jumble will be MUCH easier.
Brian G Premium Member almost 8 years ago
Add 2 more zeros, at least let the man make $256.00
rpmurray almost 8 years ago
Shouldn’t that computer scientist be some H-1B offshore from India?
up2trixx almost 8 years ago
Without knowing the answer to those math questions, and having read Foxtrot long enough to know how geeky Amend is, I’d say 1000000, which is the binary equivalent of 64
KenseidenXL almost 8 years ago
1000000
cubswin2016 almost 8 years ago
I am a big fan of Jumbles, but not like this.
Mary E Abdill Premium Member almost 8 years ago
1. 2,808 = (24 * 117 = 2808)2. 431 (has to start with 1, for final answer. therefore, only choices are 134 and 143, and 134 is not prime)3. 4096 (16 cubed is 4096. zero has to be in 2nd position)4. 479,001,600 (just keep multiplying)
Answer: 1,000,000 is the $64 check in binary
AndrewJones almost 8 years ago
I found that one easier than the word jumbles…
Cozmik Cowboy almost 8 years ago
There only 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary & those who don’t……..
BiggerNate91 almost 8 years ago
Oh man, do I remember the “Jason’s Jumbles.” I think these are the only other two.
http://www.gocomics.com/foxtrot/2005/07/03
http://www.gocomics.com/foxtrot/2005/08/07
BiggerNate91 almost 8 years ago
¿ssǝuuʍop-ǝpᴉsdn ʍǝu ʎɯ ǝʞᴉl noʎ op
locake almost 8 years ago
He can request the check any way he wants it, but Payroll will still write it for $64.
46 almost 8 years ago
Thanks Bill. I liked it. Well, I made short work of the first and third question using a basic calculator. For the second question I pulled up a prime number program I wrote in BASIC in the ‘80s. For the readers, the ONLY permutation of those numbers that is a prime is 431, and that provides the “1” in the answer (which I figured out first). So that meant the final question has zeros in the circles. Back to BASIC for more programming fun… There are actually a bunch of values that are divisible by 12 that have zeros in those places, the lowest being 146007900 (which is 12 × 12167325). That’ll be $1M, please.
toahero almost 8 years ago
I actually understood the entity of a Jason Fox math creation.
Suddenly, I’m wondering if I should re-think my life.
foilist01 almost 8 years ago
I want the organic chemistry one!!!
SuperCharged5- almost 4 years ago
Jason’s Jumble has returned!