I dunno. This is actually a fairly decent strip today, all things considered. It certainly is a snarky commentary on the quality of personal communication in this day and age. And yes, Panel #2 probably would be more serious than Panel #1.
Just an observation…….Comic strips are created for entertainment on the day of publication. They aren’t generally done for posterity; it just works out that way sometimes. The so-called “Nancy Classics” are often as relevant today as they were in 1955. These past few days of “Nancy” won’t be in a few years (or less).
It’s just one week and her drawing already improved. With Gilchrist, what I did not like was that all the characters he invented were visibly poorly drawn compared to the characters he had Bushmiller to copy from (except Fritzi which was still bad because Gilchrist insisted on his own cowlick hairdo). For example, the character Phil when it first came out looked like Gumby was making a cameo. It did not look human at all. Likewise, the stray cat and the patriotic dog looked very different from the other pets. The original ones had just black dots for eyes while the ones created by Gilchrist had both black and white in the eyeballs. It’s like they came from another planet.
some idiot from R'lyeh Premium Member over 6 years ago
That’s how you do Nancy in the 21st century – straddling the line between being trite and being accessible.
KaiserFrazer67 over 6 years ago
I dunno. This is actually a fairly decent strip today, all things considered. It certainly is a snarky commentary on the quality of personal communication in this day and age. And yes, Panel #2 probably would be more serious than Panel #1.
blunebottle over 6 years ago
Sheesh! I must be too old…..
jrankin1959 over 6 years ago
Great commentary! (You Make Me Feel Like A) Natural Woman it ain’t…
MJ Premium Member over 6 years ago
Just an observation…….Comic strips are created for entertainment on the day of publication. They aren’t generally done for posterity; it just works out that way sometimes. The so-called “Nancy Classics” are often as relevant today as they were in 1955. These past few days of “Nancy” won’t be in a few years (or less).
wjayhughes over 6 years ago
I’m old. I’m getting it, and I’m digging it. But then, I never could get past the van-art look of Gilchrist’ version.
davidf42 over 6 years ago
This is a pretty good strip today. It puts Nancy in the 21st century and does a good job of it. The only thing I can object to is the skin tones.
Donaldo Premium Member over 6 years ago
that’s funny
Dnkdunn over 6 years ago
Nancy’s is on my hit list. Like classics. dnkdunn
Ignatz Premium Member over 6 years ago
Ok, it’s not just another cloying reference to modern technology (EVERY SINGLE DAY), it’s condescending about the kids who use it.
Spence12 Premium Member over 6 years ago
Seriously? Nancy wears her hair ribbon to bed?
Crandlemire over 6 years ago
That is actually funny – I think I will save it to my wall — ha
planostanton over 6 years ago
The kids still look like they need a doctor!
FDNY over 6 years ago
There is something happening here. It’s been a great 10-day run (sorry Sunday) from Olivia. Yesterday’s was a grand slam.
maybeinthenextworld over 6 years ago
More greatness from the Queen of Comics! Viva Jaimes!
MichaelJPatrick1 over 6 years ago
I just want to say that these comics are a breath of fresh air and I’m glad they exist.
Jan C over 6 years ago
Cute strip today.
scarygoround creator over 6 years ago
I love this new Nancy. It’s weird, silly, and great.
InquireWithin over 6 years ago
Once again with the low-key humor. I like it.
kpmarcks Premium Member over 6 years ago
I love this!!
Major Matt Mason Premium Member over 6 years ago
Sluggo’s going all in on the corn!
Major Matt Mason Premium Member over 6 years ago
The premise is OK, but it’s overly wordy. Here’s how I would have written it:
1) I “liked” you today.
2) I “liked” you and “shared” you.
3) Gee. He really MUST care…
Goes back to Ernie’s KISS ethos.
jossy138 over 6 years ago
It’s just one week and her drawing already improved. With Gilchrist, what I did not like was that all the characters he invented were visibly poorly drawn compared to the characters he had Bushmiller to copy from (except Fritzi which was still bad because Gilchrist insisted on his own cowlick hairdo). For example, the character Phil when it first came out looked like Gumby was making a cameo. It did not look human at all. Likewise, the stray cat and the patriotic dog looked very different from the other pets. The original ones had just black dots for eyes while the ones created by Gilchrist had both black and white in the eyeballs. It’s like they came from another planet.
fuzz3942 over 6 years ago
Better today, but still don’t get the weird coloring.
Sneaker over 6 years ago
Not the Smartest Man On the Planet -- Maybe Close Premium Member over 6 years ago
Classic Bushmiller humor. Dry as the Oklahoma dust bowl.
countoftowergrove over 6 years ago
Not bad today. The characters’ color is still off. When do we see Fritzi?
Happy, happy, happy!!! Premium Member over 6 years ago
Still liking it.
taterpie over 6 years ago
I am loving the new Nancy. This is entirely my jam.
Spade Jr. over 6 years ago
Skin tones are really bad. No real purpose other than “to be different.” Just doesn’t work for me.
jelanigreenidge over 6 years ago
I am a fan. Big ol’ fan.
Bafflegabs! over 6 years ago
Signed up for an account here just to follow the new Nancy. They’ve all been really funny and dry, I love it!
LochNessMonster over 6 years ago
I like Nancy’s little blushes in the final pannel, its very cute