Frazz by Jef Mallett for August 12, 2018

  1. Bluedog
    Bilan  about 6 years ago

    They’re teaching chemistry to 2nd graders now? Wow!

     •  Reply
  2. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Really, this is one of the amazing facts that contributes to the existence of life on Earth at all. If H2O behaved like almost every other chemical compound, it would contract instead of expanding when it solidified. Then the denser ice would sink to the bottom of every body of water, new ice would form on the surface and sink, and so on until it was solid ice top to bottom, without a sheltered supply of liquid water able to support life thru the winter.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    asrialfeeple  about 6 years ago

    Love the curiosity of the girl and the educational value of this strip. Also, are you all aware of the dangers of Dihydrogenmonoxide?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    gammaguy  about 6 years ago

    The real reason that ice floats is that the water molecules join together in a rigid crystalline structure, which contains much more “empty space” than water in the liquid form.

    That is why it’s less dense.

     •  Reply
  5. 2018 max verstappen s nr 33 red bull rb14 f1 for avatar 3  400x400
    LeftCoastKen Premium Member about 6 years ago

    B.S. – We all know what that isM.S. – More of SamePh.D. – Piled Higher and Deeper

    Someone with a Ph.D. has spent his time studying more and more about less and less, until eventually he knows everything about nothing.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    stairsteppublishing  about 6 years ago

    Interesting Frazz and comments from above.

     •  Reply
  7. Louis2
    PoodleGroomer  about 6 years ago

    Everybody is missing the facts:

    1. cream floats on water or water sugar solutions.

    2. Ice cream is not a solid rigid block because it is a frozen whipped foam.

    3. Most ice creams don’t melt too quickly because of the emulsifiers and gums used to trap the air.

     •  Reply
  8. Louis2
    PoodleGroomer  about 6 years ago

    Kansas State has a dairy with experimental ice creams.

     •  Reply
  9. 2 way wrist tv
    1552km  about 6 years ago

    nobody uses Fahrenheit when discussing science- water is the most dense at 4° C that’s why lakes don’t freeze from the bottom up (like all other liquids) allowing fish to survive winters

     •  Reply
  10. 300px little nemo 1906 02 11 last panel
    lonecat  about 6 years ago

    Here was my Ph.D. experience. First I had to have a B.A., and that meant four years of courses, including a distribution requirement for a number of courses outside my major. Then an M.A., with two years of course work in the general field, in my case classics. I took courses in Greek and Roman history (including reading Thucydides in Greek and Tacitus in Latin), an excellent course in Plato in Greek, as well as courses in Early Greek Poetry and Greek Drama. Then I moved on to the Ph.D., and I did two more years of course work, including a course in Roman Art, Roman History of the Imperial Period, Apuleius, Homer, two courses in Historical Linguistics, a course in the editing of texts (based on Ovid), a course called a Proseminar, in which we did assignments in a number of subfields, such as epigraphy and paleography, and reading courses (one on one with a professor) in Roman Comedy, Herodotus, and the Roman poet Propertius. Then I had to take what were called General Exams: translation exams in Greek and Latin, followed by an oral exam in general topics in Greek and Roman history and literature. Then I had to take what were called special exams: each student picked one Latin author and one Greek author and one topic and spent a year reading extensively on those, and all of this was tested in an oral exam. Then I had to propose a dissertation topic, and I had to defend my topic in another oral exam. Then I had to write the dissertation, which took two years. The dissertation topic was pretty specialized, I do admit that, but I managed to solve a problem which had first been raised almost a hundred years ago. So, yes, the dissertation was specialized, but it came in the context of a pretty broad training in Classical history, literature, philosophy, art history and archeology, as well as ancillary fields, such as historical linguistics, epigraphy, paleography, and the editing of texts.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Bruce1253  about 6 years ago

    Water has a molecular angle of 109 deg instead of 180 deg as most other compounds and therefore is a polar molecule. Meaning ice floats and the consequences are as others have pointed out. It also means water can dissolve many other things, like salt and organics (we can be described as a big bag of salty water). If you want a proof that God exists, this is one of them.

     •  Reply
  12. Fdr avatar 6d9910b68a3c 128
    Teto85 Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Yah. Water is weird.

     •  Reply
  13. Erotica ann robot 2
    RoboZsaZsa  about 6 years ago

    When I was a freshman at Caltech, one of our professors was Jürg Waser who was a world expert on exactly this one thing - water. How it freezes, how it melts, how its density changes, how the H2O molecules arrange themselves under different circumstances almost like crystals even in liquid form, how the H2O molecules act more like separate H+ and OH ions sometimes… His thick university-printed textbook was affectionately known as “Waser’s Wasser.”

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Uncle Bob  about 6 years ago

    The heck with all this. What really matters is why does the beach ball continue to spin and hover over the vacuum cleaner hose when you stick the hose into the exhaust!?

     •  Reply
  15. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member about 6 years ago

    “Certain thing which are unlikely are nonetheless essential for life to exist. Life exists, therefore God exists.”

    Stupidest agument for the existence of God there is. We have yet to find evidence of the exitence of extraterrestrial life anywhere, although we are finding more and more environments which, consistent with our CURRNT understanding, have the POTENTIAL for life. That these planets have the POTENTIAL for life but do not (so far as we know) support life indicates that life is not “inevitable” (under the right conditions); the fact that we do not KNOW whether any of these planets support life (despite potential to support life) leaves open the possibility that we are not unique; if we are not unique, most (if not all) cnceptions of a Creating Deity with a Plan for the World are rendered superfluous.

    We are here; whether by design or by happenstance, we wonder WHY we are here. If life (with the capacity for self-awareness) exists elsewhere, it seems likely that they ALSO wonder why, alone (so far as they know) they are the only planet in the universe upon which they know life exists.

     •  Reply
  16. White tiger swimming
    cabalonrye  about 6 years ago

    A simple question doesn’t mean a simple answer.

     •  Reply
  17. Tumblr mbbz3vrusj1qdlmheo1 250
    Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo]  about 6 years ago

    Tautologies are not good arguments. And will someone calculate the chance of an outside intelligence existing independent of universe formations?

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    Bill The Nuke  about 6 years ago

    Heat doesn’t rise, it disperses (entropy). Hot air rises because it’s less dense.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Frazz