Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
This brought to mind (besides the obvious current political parallel) a line thatâs stuck in my head from a 1981 Doonesbury. It even came up when googled the phrase. Secretary of State Al Haig, with an interpreter being interviewed. Uses fuzzy political buzzwords. And in the last panelâWe plan to scenario them rosilyâ His interpreter is cut off before he lays it out in plain language.
Should have taken the Chinese approach, ânon-aggressivelyâ take over others territory, and have the entire Navy just over the horizon in case anyone wants to dispute that youâre building military bases.
Then insist itâs all due to the âaggressionâ of others.
Thereâs something wrong with that sentence. âHe just caused one of the fact-checkerâs head to explode.â One of his or her head? One of the head?
No no no no no.
If youâre talking about âone ofâ anything, youâve got something in the plural. So it would be one of the heads, or one of the fact-checkers. And if youâve only got one fact-checker, then it would be: âHe just caused one of the fact-checkerâs heads to explode.â But itâs okay, because the fact-checker had multiple heads.
On the other hand, if youâve got multiple fact-checkers, and each of them has only one head, then the sentence would be: âHe just caused one of the fact-checkersâ head to explode.â But if the fact-checkers have multiple heads, it would be: âHe just caused one of the fact-checkersâ heads to explode.â
Bilan over 4 years ago
Still a rookie, by Earth standards.
syzygy47 over 4 years ago
This brought to mind (besides the obvious current political parallel) a line thatâs stuck in my head from a 1981 Doonesbury. It even came up when googled the phrase. Secretary of State Al Haig, with an interpreter being interviewed. Uses fuzzy political buzzwords. And in the last panelâWe plan to scenario them rosilyâ His interpreter is cut off before he lays it out in plain language.
chuckcork1 over 4 years ago
Should have taken the Chinese approach, ânon-aggressivelyâ take over others territory, and have the entire Navy just over the horizon in case anyone wants to dispute that youâre building military bases.
Then insist itâs all due to the âaggressionâ of others.
Algolei I over 4 years ago
Thereâs something wrong with that sentence. âHe just caused one of the fact-checkerâs head to explode.â One of his or her head? One of the head?
No no no no no.
If youâre talking about âone ofâ anything, youâve got something in the plural. So it would be one of the heads, or one of the fact-checkers. And if youâve only got one fact-checker, then it would be: âHe just caused one of the fact-checkerâs heads to explode.â But itâs okay, because the fact-checker had multiple heads.
On the other hand, if youâve got multiple fact-checkers, and each of them has only one head, then the sentence would be: âHe just caused one of the fact-checkersâ head to explode.â But if the fact-checkers have multiple heads, it would be: âHe just caused one of the fact-checkersâ heads to explode.â
kaffekup over 4 years ago
I wonder if someoneâs been watching The BoysâŠ
lunapeachie over 4 years ago
âWeâve hooked you up to this lie detector. It will let us know if youâre lying. Do you understand?ââYes.âmachine explodes
ComicsBinger Premium Member over 4 years ago
What took it so long for someoneâs head to explode? This has been going on for years.
Michael G. over 4 years ago
âDoesnât prove a blessed thing!â
geese28 over 4 years ago
Dirk Raider âmostly peacefullyâ conquered that planet
ChessPirate over 4 years ago
âYes, the conquered wine is very sweetâŠâ
âThatâs Concord wine.â
âYou say it your way, and Iâll say it my wayâŠâ âș
WCraft over 4 years ago
OhâŠjust taking the boys on a little vacation?
David Huie Green LikeNobody'sEverSeen over 4 years ago
He learned from the best/worst.