Two Party Opera by Brian Carroll for April 13, 2023

  1. Tj
    • Thomas  about 1 year ago

    Universal

    https://www.ohchr.org/en/human-rights/universal-declaration/universal-declaration-human-rights

     •  Reply
  2. Picture
    ChristopherBurns  about 1 year ago

    In law, language is king. One wonders what loophole are created by the difference between unalienable and inalienable. And what will that lead to when we finally make contact with aliens?

     •  Reply
  3. Andy square
    wangster2  about 1 year ago

    Have to thank you for the Al Jaffe folding cartoon – it printed great and I was able to show it many friends, reminisce about Mad Magazine and remember the fun it was. I’ll do the same today.

     •  Reply
  4. 18199310 794855490678998 297509042221646966 n clipped rev 1
    ShadowMaster  about 1 year ago

    Nice John Hancock signature there.

     •  Reply
  5. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member about 1 year ago

    I love discussions of the ins and uns of grammar.

     •  Reply
  6. Marx lennon
    charliekane  about 1 year ago

    Happy 280th, Tommy!

    On and off friends. Ya know they died the same day.

     •  Reply
  7. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  about 1 year ago

    Is this the first appearance in “TPO’” of Thomas Jefferson without a glass of wine in his hand? And here I thought it was his inalienable right to drink wine!

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Vagabond53  about 1 year ago

    I can understand what “Inalienable” refers to, but is “unalienable” even a word in the English language?

     •  Reply
  9. Desron14
    Masterskrain  about 1 year ago

    “I’ll speak to the printer!”

    John Adams “1776”

     •  Reply
  10. Large adolf
    Adolf Trump  about 1 year ago

    Flammable or Imflammable? You choose.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    tjteixeira Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Unconceivable!

     •  Reply
  12. Carthago delenda est
    Carthago delenda est  about 1 year ago

    In.

     •  Reply
  13. Photo
    AndrewSihler  about 1 year ago

    Well, normally in- construes with Latinate words, un- with Germanic ones. There are of course many accepted exceptions—unpardonable, unpredictable, unaccented, unaccompanied, unaccustomed, and so on. Oddly, there seem to be no forms in in- (or il- ir- im-) in the privative sense, bien entendu, built to Germanic elements.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Two Party Opera