To prove a point about how few people actually read the “terms and conditions” when making a purchase online, British game retailer GameStation decided to play an April fools joke on its customers, tricking many of them into agreeing to hand over the rights to their soul.
The E.U.L.A., OR “End-user License Agreement” is even more nefarious than that, kids.
It is a legal agreement in which you agree that the application’s creator cannot be held liable for ANYTHING the installed application does to either you or the world, and it also usually indicates that, while you paid for it, you don’t actually “own” it, they’re just letting you “use” it for a while.
Basically, they’re telling you that you don’t “own” the candy bar, you’re just using it with their permission for a while and EVERYTHING that you do with it is still theirs, including the “poop” you produce…
I HATE Terms and Conditions, Mountains of eye glazing Lawyer Speak and the possibility of a Rumpelstiltskin Clause in there if you sign into the service without slogging through it. A most heinous trap.
BigBoy about 1 year ago
Isn’t there an app to read those yet ?
A Common 'tator about 1 year ago
It really happened…
To prove a point about how few people actually read the “terms and conditions” when making a purchase online, British game retailer GameStation decided to play an April fools joke on its customers, tricking many of them into agreeing to hand over the rights to their soul.
>
JudasPeckerwood about 1 year ago
Surely our corporate overlords would never even dream of betraying our trust!
The Reader Premium Member about 1 year ago
Azoogur is the lawyer for a lot of those tech companies.
skildude about 1 year ago
Huh? Mine has me pledging my soul to Ba’al.
pathamil about 1 year ago
I thought it was the god An-dar’oid…
mommavamp about 1 year ago
And this is why—at the very least——I always scan through, and stop to read where needed those Terms and Conditions.
wrloftis about 1 year ago
“There is no Dana, only Azoogur.”
davanden about 1 year ago
Sounds like a Doctor Who plot.
kartis about 1 year ago
That’s how they keep the backend systems working. Regular chicken sacrifices. Fortunately they are in the form of sandwiches.
ChukLitl Premium Member about 1 year ago
Agreement under duress is invalid. Trying to use a product, for which they’ve already taken my money, is duress.
Frank Burns Eats Worms about 1 year ago
If it’s not disclaimer, it’s dat claimer.
komix about 1 year ago
“Adhesion” contracts. They stick to you.
wellis1947 Premium Member about 1 year ago
The E.U.L.A., OR “End-user License Agreement” is even more nefarious than that, kids.
It is a legal agreement in which you agree that the application’s creator cannot be held liable for ANYTHING the installed application does to either you or the world, and it also usually indicates that, while you paid for it, you don’t actually “own” it, they’re just letting you “use” it for a while.
Basically, they’re telling you that you don’t “own” the candy bar, you’re just using it with their permission for a while and EVERYTHING that you do with it is still theirs, including the “poop” you produce…
ars731 about 1 year ago
Good thing I sold my soul to Nurgle an couple of years ago
norphos about 1 year ago
I HATE Terms and Conditions, Mountains of eye glazing Lawyer Speak and the possibility of a Rumpelstiltskin Clause in there if you sign into the service without slogging through it. A most heinous trap.