B.C. by Mastroianni and Hart for May 03, 2009

Everybody’s/Everything’s a critic.

My, what a little shrew you are.

Men didn’t walk with Dino’s! Look it up.

No, but BC has always had the occasional saur. It’s part of the fun.

He obviously forgot to hang out the no-dino strip.

I wonder. Is it assumed that a man tracking a dino would be barefoot? What would the footprint of a man wearing leather ‘moccasins’ look like? Might they appear to be web-footed? Perhaps there might be a toe or two sublimated by the moccasin skin. I wonder. Is the issue as settled as many would have us believe? After all, if it is so conclusively not man-prints, what creature did make the prints? I don’t think any one really knows for sure. Taken from: http://www.youdebate.com/DEBATES/creationism_footprints.HTM

Back to the comic….I don’t find BC very comical nowadays. Lost it’s edge. Dull.

“Patience, Jackass … Patience!”

Of course man didn’t “walk with” dinosaurs! If anything, he ran away from them!

papawhale says:

Men didn’t walk with Dino’s! Look it up.

. No, they didn’t. Men made soup that the dino drank than poured on man. Reference CARTOON above. XD

DesultoryPhillipic says:

I wonder. Is it assumed that a man tracking a dino would be barefoot? What would the footprint of a man wearing leather ‘moccasins’ look like? ….. . I used to live in Glen Rose, Texas a few miles from Dinosaur Valley State Park and have walked in the streambed mentioned above. These “Man-Tracks” were a variety of misidentified phoenamena.

http://tinyurl.com/dxjelk

While it’s fun to enjoy and imagine, I don’t suppose you really believe in Klingons and Romulans as shown on Star Trek.

papawhale–It’s a comic strip not a science lesson, eh?

No more than you believe in the Easter Bunny, but one is a contrived entertainment and the other a possibility.