B.C. by Mastroianni and Hart for September 18, 2011

  1. Pak protecteur
    Rodney99  almost 13 years ago

    Serious loss of credibility there, guy.

     •  Reply
  2. Carroll   an f40
    adubman  almost 13 years ago

    That’s where the original ‘mark’ in ‘trademark’ came from.

    Straight from the department, “Do as I say, not as I squash.”

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    artybee  almost 13 years ago

    People are at the top of the food chain except for mosquitoes, for which people are food. So it’s okay to smush ’em.

     •  Reply
  4. Grog poop
    GROG Premium Member almost 13 years ago

    I have no problem with that. Die, blood suckers, die!

    Good Morning, Fellow Cave Dwellers.

     •  Reply
  5. Siberian tigers 22
    Hunter7  almost 13 years ago

    It was a quick and painless death. He was a happy little bloodsucker right up to the end. Never felt a thing. Thus, no cruelty.

     •  Reply
  6. Senmurv
    mrsullenbeauty  almost 13 years ago

    @Nabu: Was the “idiot” a younger guy? The mama cougar might like him.

     •  Reply
  7. Cc
    spirit2002  almost 13 years ago

    Not too good, she’d eat the prey.

     •  Reply
  8. Blackbeard avatar
    ShadowBeast Premium Member almost 13 years ago

    I disagree, Bugs are part of the animal kingdom and should stay there, Rats have diseases too should we not consider them animals too?However killing a mosquito is indeed not animal cruelty it’s self-defense that can’t be avoided.

     •  Reply
  9. Nebulous100
    Nebulous Premium Member almost 13 years ago

    The cruelty free way of exterminating a mosquito is by lethal injection.

    The problem is getting them to hold still while you stick the IV in them.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    thealienalf  almost 13 years ago

    PETA- People Eating Tasty Animals…now thats something I can relate to!!

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    andavall  almost 13 years ago

    Strange… as I was reading this comic, a mosquito landed on the monitor and I squashed it… weird…

     •  Reply
  12. Imagesca66di1a
    Thehag  almost 13 years ago

    As much as I am for cruelty free, rats decimated my vegetable garden this year. And jeez they are filthy. If I don’t keep the population down they try to get into the house. My terrier is only a recreational rat killer, and the older dog doesn’t allow cats.

     •  Reply
  13. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member almost 13 years ago

    It’s a false dichotomy, saying that EITHER we have no obligation to treat animals humanely OR we must refrain from eating meat and squashing mosquitos. They are living, feeling things, but life consumes life at every level. I find it appalling that we torture animals to test hair spray, but I don’t object to testing life-saving drugs on chimpanzees. Conditions in factory farms are disgraceful, so I’ll choose free-range poultry or open-graze beef when I can. It’s often not a question of if or how we kill them, but of what sort of life we allow them to lead before that.

     •  Reply
  14. Siberian tigers 22
    Hunter7  almost 13 years ago

    Much rather get the “organic” meats and free range eggs. The animals are treated much better, fed a healthier diet more suited to their ‘natural’ tendancies and no hormones, limited antibiotics.

     •  Reply
  15. Frog
    momazilla  almost 13 years ago

    “Catch and reliese” tramatizes the fish, and we should not use live bait. NONSENSE! I’ld say BS but that might offend the Bull.

     •  Reply
  16. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member almost 13 years ago

    I’d agree that “catch and release” is pointless and cruel, not a “humane alternative.” Would we consider hunters that shoot a deer, then patch it up with bandages and let it go, to be more humane than those who eat what they shoot?

    It’s not the live bait that turns recreational fishing into animal cruelty, it’s the hook. Pogo used to fish without ’em, as it made the pastime more relaxing anyway.

     •  Reply
  17. Papa smurf walking smiling
    route66paul  almost 13 years ago

    There is a point to limiting the cruelty in many factory farms, but humane means different things to different people. People with outside hunting or working dogs have a close relationship(the dog sure seems happy), but usually are left out in the cold to become climatized – is that cruel?

    Years ago I worked with a guy that had fighting pit bulls – going to his home, it was obvious that that pack loved him and he sure seemed to love them. As far as I know, he didn’t fight them past first blood, and had the same dogs for years. I really do not know if it is always as cruel as depicted.

    I see on TV that it is cruel to keep a dog alive with a large growth(like a breast that has a tumor). I couldn’t afford the $1000 operation and the vet said to keep her until she was in pain – she lived 4 more years running and playing – So who is the one to say what is cruel? Obviously, not the dog.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    Brother_James437  almost 13 years ago

    do unto animals, as you would like them to treat you. But woo unto you insects that bug the snot out of us.We will send you to squashville.

     •  Reply
  19. Escape key
    DGWillie  almost 13 years ago

    I love what I read on the label of a T-Shirt: “These shirts were tested on animals. They didn’t fit.”

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    iced tea  almost 13 years ago

    How about people who kill spiders, snakes, and flies because they’re so annoying? Isn’t that animal cruelty,too?

     •  Reply
  21. Elba 20111218 00003
    doc white  almost 13 years ago

    I seem to remember that TRADE MARK was started by the Smith bros. of cough drop fame. They would put jars in the stores to sell loose cough drops.The stores would buy other brands and put them in Smiths jar. To stop this they put ther drops in small boxes with a likeness of the Smith Bros. and under there ilkeness they placed there first names TRADE & MARK Smith.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From B.C.