One doesn’t provide information in a disagreement to influence the person with which they have said disagreement. One provides it for the uncommitted bystander with no personal stake in the argument.
sometimes I want to understand why someone else chooses the way they do. I may not change my choice but at least I can see some of the reasons people think otherwise. And it is all good until people start calling each other names. If they make a personal attack first, I won.
Zykoic 2 months ago
The ultimate trollation.
BigDaveGlass 2 months ago
What? A keyboard warrior surrendered! Colour me Shocked!
chief tommy 2 months ago
Fake news
dsatvoinde Premium Member 2 months ago
Looks about right.
chris_o42 2 months ago
And that would do it…
rockyridge1977 2 months ago
The end of time??
Malph 2 months ago
Had to block my sister due to her endless rants.
baskate_2000 2 months ago
Wow, there may be hope after all!
ChessPirate 2 months ago
His account got hacked… ☺
ncorgbl 2 months ago
Into what?
KEA 2 months ago
There was someone rational on Facebook?!?!
bilbrlsn 2 months ago
One doesn’t provide information in a disagreement to influence the person with which they have said disagreement. One provides it for the uncommitted bystander with no personal stake in the argument.
marilynnbyerly 2 months ago
I don’t bother. They LOVE to waste my time. Idiots be idiots.
cuzinron47 2 months ago
Must have been talking to Putin.
car2ner 2 months ago
sometimes I want to understand why someone else chooses the way they do. I may not change my choice but at least I can see some of the reasons people think otherwise. And it is all good until people start calling each other names. If they make a personal attack first, I won.
eddi-TBH 2 months ago
He reprogrammed a bot. That’s even more dramatic.